Jin-Hao Zhu(朱金豪) Lei Jin(金磊) Zhe-Huan Jin(金哲欢) Guang-Fei Ding(丁广飞)Bo Zheng(郑波) Shuai Guo(郭帅) Ren-Jie Chen(陈仁杰) and A-Ru Yan(闫阿儒)
1CAS Key Laboratory of Magnetic Materials and Devices,and Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Magnetic Materials and Application Technology,
Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering,Chinese Academy of Sciences(CAS),Ningbo 315201,China
2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China
Keywords: Nd–Fe–B magnet,magnetic properties,grain boundary,microstructures
The 2:14:1-type Nd–Fe–B magnets with excellent magnetic performance have been widely used in traction motors of electric vehicles,wind turbines and other fields.[1–3]As heavy rare-earth(HRE)resources are limited and expensive,it is urgent to find other effective ways of avoiding the abuse of expensive elements to stabilize the performance of the magnets at high temperature operation. Based on the nucleation fields theory,[4,5]the achievement of high coercivity relies on the modification in the averaged local effective demagnetization factor and microstructural parameter for the Nd–Fe–B sintered magnets without HRE.Grain refinement has been an effective approach to improve the coercivity by reducing the demagnetization effect of the grains,[6–9]but it is also limited by process cost and equipment conditions.
On the other hand, the annealing process is a significant way to improve the microstructures in grain boundary(GB)areas. It is generally accepted that the thin GB phase is formed mainly by the infiltration of liquid from the triple junction phase (TJP) during the annealing process. And the morphology of the GB phase/main grain interface becomes smooth after the annealing process.[10,11]In order to strengthen the effect of the annealing process and improve the wettability of the GB phase, metal elements formed low melting points alloy with rare-earths (RE), such as Cu, Ga, and Al, were discussed.[12–14]In addition,the distribution of these trace alloy elements was influenced by the annealing process, especially Cu atoms were enriched in the Nd-rich/Nd2Fe14B interface after the annealing process.[15,16]By adjusting the distribution and composition of the GB phase,the RE-M(M=Al,Cu) is reported to be beneficial for high coercivity through addition or grain boundary diffusion process after annealing process.[17–20]
Recently, the Nd–Fe–B magnets prepared from Nd-rich Ga-doped Nd–Fe–B strip cast flakes have become an important object of research.[21,22]In these Ga-doped magnets,continuous GB phases were formed which brings out the isolated intergrain exchange coupling. Note that unlike the conventional magnets,these significant changes in microstructure and coercivity of Ga-doped magnets are accompanied by the formation of anti-ferromagneticRE6Fe13Ga(RE=Pr,Nd)phase after the annealing process. This GB phase formation process is affected by grain boundary composition,[23,24]and the preparation conditions as well.[25,26]
In this work,we investigate the microstructures and magnetic properties of B-lean Nd–Fe–B sintered and annealed magnets with different quantities of Nd–Ga additions. According to the sensitive dependence of the formation of theRE6Fe13Ga phase on the composition and the annealing process,the effects of the annealing process on the magnets with different compositions of the GB phase are systematically investigated based on the characterization, microstructure and elemental distributions of phase constituents.
In this experiment, the master alloy with the nominal compositions of (PrNd)32Febal.(CuAlCoZr)1.75B0.88(wt% in content ratio) were prepared by strip casting. These strips were subjected to the hydrogen decrepitated process and the jet milling process to obtain the Nd–Fe–B powders(∼2.8µm in size). Then, the Nd77.5Ga22.5(wt% in content ratio) powders(∼2.5µm in size)were also obtained by the similar process. The Nd–Fe–B powders mixed with different content ratios of the Nd–Ga powders (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 wt%) were compacted with a magnetic field 1800 kA/m followed by isostatic pressing at 150 MPa. Afterwards, the sintering process was performed at 1030◦C–1040◦C for 2 h in vacuum, followed by argon gas quenching,accordingly obtaining the as-sintered magnets(AS).The as-sintered samples were also annealed at 500◦C for 2 h in vacuum,accordingly obtaining the annealed magnets(AN).Hereafter,the Nd–Fe–B magnets with different Nd–Ga concentrations were named 0NG–8NG samples.
Magnetic properties of sintered and annealed magnets were measured by pulsed field magnetometer(PFM)(HIRST PFM14.CN) at a temperature of 20◦C. The constitution of phase was identified by x-ray diffraction (XRD) (Bruker D8 Advance Davinci) using CuKαradiation. The microstructures and element distribution of the magnets were observed by using the back scatter electron scanning electron microscopy (BSE-SEM) equipped with energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) detector, and the scanning/transmission electron microscope(S/TEM)(Talos F200X)with energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy(EDS)signal detection.
Figures 1(a)and 1(b) show the diverse effects of the annealing process on the magnetic properties in magnets with different Nd–Ga additions. In the annealed magnets with fewer Nd–Ga additions as shown in area I,the remanence(Br)is unchanged basically and the coercivity (Hcj) is increased slightly compared with in the sintered magnets. It is similar to the effect of the annealing process on the conventional magnet.With the further increase of Nd–Ga addition shown in area II,theBrof the annealed magnet has a slight decrease relative to that of the sintered magnets,while the change ofHcjcontinues to increase after the annealing process.Finally,with the excessive addition of Nd–Ga shown in area III, the increase inHcjof the magnet remains basically unchanged after annealing,while the change inBrbecomes smaller. Thus, the annealed magnet with 4-wt%Nd–Ga addition is considered to have excellent comprehensive magnetic properties. Table 1 shows the magnetic properties of representative samples from the areas I,II,and III.
Fig.1. Diverse effects of annealing process on(a)remanence and(b)coercivity in magnets with Nd–Ga concentrations.
Table 1. Values of remanence Br, coercivity µ0Hcj, and maximum energy product(BH)max of samples.
In order to investigate the effects of the annealing process on the phase composition of anisotropic magnets with 0%,4%,and 8% (wt%) Nd–Ga concentration, XRD analyses are performed as shown in Fig.2. The tested plane is perpendicular to theCaxis. Neither the annealing process nor the addition of Nd–Ga is found to have a significant effect on the grain orientation in the anisotropic magnets, where their ratios of relative intensity,I(006)/I(105), range about from 0.95 to 1.00.The characteristic peaks of the Nd6Fe13Ga phase are detected in the 4NG sample after being annealed, and compared with in the 0NG. The diffraction peaks of the Nd6Fe13Ga phase slightly shift toward the low-angle region. It is considered that Pr atoms are substituted for part of Nd atoms at theRE6Fe13Ga phase,in which the radius of Pr atom in the alloy is larger than that of Nd atom due to lanthanide contraction. In addition,the characteristic peaks of Nd6Fe13Ga are also detected in the 8NG-AN sample, which corresponds strictly to its standard peak. Therefore, the introduction of Ga by intergranular addition of Nd–Ga is similar to alloy melting. It results in the formation of Nd6Fe13Ga phase regulated by the appropriate composition and annealing process. What is worth noting is that the characteristic peaks of the Nd6Fe13Ga are measured in the 8NG-AS sample similarly. Thus the excess Nd–Ga addition leads the Nd6Fe13Ga phase to form in sintered magnet.
Fig.2. (a)XRD profiles of the anisotropic as-sintered and annealed magnets with 0%,4%,and 8%(wt%)Nd–Ga concentration,with tested plane being perpendicular to C axis. [(b)–(g)]XRD partial enlarged view of the corresponding samples,with red perpendicular line indicating three strongest peaks of Nd6Fe13Ga in XRD.
Fig.3. BSE SEM images of as-sintered and annealed magnets with Nd–Ga concentration of[(a)–(h)]0%–8%(wt%). HRTEM images of GB phases of(e)as-sintered and(d)annealed magnets with Nd–Ga concentration of 4%(wt%). Observed plane is perpendicular to C axis.
Figures 3(a)–3(h) show backscattered electron (BSE)SEM images taken from the as-sintered and annealed magnets with Nd–Ga concentration in a range of of 0%–8%(wt%).The observed plane is perpendicular to theCaxis. In the original B-lean magnet without Nd–Ga addition, Fe and Cu are enriched in the TJP according to the EDS quantitative analysis shown in Table 2. This enrichment of Fe in the GB area is beneficial to the subsequent addition of Nd–Ga to induce the Nd6Fe13Ga phase to form. With the Nd–Ga addition increasing,the proportion of TJP in the sintered magnet is enhanced.Besides, the continuous thin GB phase forms in the annealed magnet with Nd–Ga addition, and some GB phases with dim contrast are confirmed to beRE6Fe13(Ga, Cu) phase by further EDS quantitative analysis in Table 2,such as points B and D.Moreover,a small number of Nd6Fe12(Ga,Cu)2phases are found at the edge of the TJP in the 8NG-AS sample, and the excessive Nd–Ga phases are observed in the triple junctions in the 8NG-AN sample. It indicates that under the excess Nd–Ga addition,RE6(Fe, Ga)14phase trends to form in the cooling process,with residual Nd–Ga phase remaining in TJP.The high-resolution(HR)TEM bright field images of interface between adjacent grains in 4NG-AS and 4NG-AN samples are shown in Figs. 3(i) and 3(j). Comparing with in the sintered sample,a continuous thin GB phase is generated after the annealing process has contributed to the intergrain exchange decoupling.
Table 2. EDS analysis results of selected areas in Fig.3.
To further investigate the prior formation of GB phase in sintered magnets with excess Nd–Ga addition, TEM characterizations are carried out to obtain the detailed microstructure and element distribution features. The observed plane is perpendicular to theCaxis. Figure 4 shows the bright field TEM images and HAADF-STEM images of the 8NG-AS sample,where the TJP is surrounded by matrix grains. Further, there are observed two different GB phases in the GB area in sintered samples. Through EDS elemental maps and spectra obtained from points A and B, the detailed results of EDS are summarized in Table 3,there is theRE6Fe13Ga phase found at the edge of part matrix phases marked in dark green, and the GB phase marked in light green is considered to be the Nd(Ga,Cu) phase. Therefore, in the cooling process after sintering,theRE6Fe13Ga phase formation occurs partially at TJP along the edge of the part matrix phase with the excessive addition of Nd–Ga.The results of TEM characterizations correspond with the XRD and SEM analysis. Thus,a part of antiferromagneticRE6Fe13Ga phases formed by RE, Ga, and Cu reacting with ferromagnetic element regulate the magnetism of part of GB phases in sintered magnets ahead of time.
Fig. 4. (a) Bright field TEM image, (b) HAADF-STEM image, (c) corresponding schematic image, and (d) EDS elemental maps of triple junction in the 8NG as-sintered sample. Matrix grains are marked in dark blue and GB phases are marked in light green and dark green in the corresponding schematic image. Observed plane is perpendicular to C axis.
Table 3. Detailed results of EDS in Fig.4(b),with O element decreasing.
Figure 5 schematically illustrates the respective evolution of the grain boundary structure in sintered magnets with different Nd–Ga additions after annealing. For the magnet with fewer Nd–Ga additions,the composition and distribution of the GB phase have not been optimized, thus the change in the magnetic properties of the magnet is similar to that of the conventional magnet after it has been annealed. With the appropriate Nd–Ga addition in B-lean magnet,theRE6Fe13Ga phase and continuous GB phase are generated after it has been annealed. This formation of the GB phase by the annealing process results in a significant enhancement of theHcjvalue,while the further increase of Nd–Ga addition can only dilute the matrix grain proportion and form a part ofRE6Fe13Ga phases in the sintered magnet. The analyses of microstructure and magnetic properties indicate that after the annealing process, the formation of the non-ferromagneticRE6Fe13Ga phase triggers the formation of continuous GB phase,leading theBrvalue to slightly decrease,while the continuous thin GB phase isolating the matrix grain is the major factor of the significant improvement inHcjrather than the formation of theRE6Fe13Ga phase itself at TJP.Therefore,the excess addition of Nd–Ga in magnets cannot strengthen the effect of the annealing process in enhancingHcj, and prior formation of the GB phase at triple junctions leads to a weaker change inBrafter the annealing process.
Fig.5. Schematic illustrations of respective evolution of grain boundaries of magnets with different Nd–Ga additions after annealing.
In this work, the effects of the annealing process on the microstructure and magnetic properties of the B-lean Nd–Fe–B magnets with different Nd–Ga additions are investigated systematically. The characterization of phase constituents and microstructure reflect that the appropriate Nd–Ga concentration in magnets after being annealed can bring out the continuous thin GB phase and formation of the non-ferromagneticRE6Fe13Ga phase. This GB composition and annealing process can optimize the microstructure effectively to facilitate the intergrain exchange decoupling, resulting in a significant improvement ofHcjaccompanied with a slight decrease ofBrafter the annealing process. However, the excessive Nd–Ga addition cannot further optimize the microstructure, resulting in a limitedHcjincrement. In addition, a part ofRE6Fe13Ga phases are found at TJP along the edge of a part of matrix phases in sintered magnet with excessive addition,giving rise to a weaker change inBrafter the annealing process. Therefore, the respective evolution of grain boundary after the annealing process leads to the diverse change of magnetic properties in magnets with different Nd–Ga additions.