Yang Gao•Peng Dang•Zhong Zhao
Abstract Afforestation has been implemented to reduce soil erosion and improve the environment of the Loess Plateau,China.Although it increased soil organic carbon(SOC),the stability of the increase is unknown.Additionally,the variations of soil inorganic carbon(SIC)following afforestation needs to bere confirmed.After planting Robinia pseudoacacia,Pinus tabuliformis,and Hippophae rhamnoides on bare land on the Loess Plateau,total soil carbon(TSC)was measured and its two components,SIC and SOC,as well as the light and heavy fractions within SOC under bare lands and woodlands at the soil surface(0–20 cm).The results show that TSC on bare land was 24.5 Mg ha-1and significantly increased to 51.6 Mg ha-1for R.pseudoacacia,47.0 Mg ha-1for P.tabuliformis and 39.9 Mg ha-1for H.rhamnoides.The accumulated total soil carbon under R.pseudoacacia,P.tabuliformis,and H.rhamnoides,the heavy fraction(HFSOC)accounted for 65.2,31.7 and 76.2%,respectively;the light fraction(LF-SOC)accounted for 18.0,52.0 and 4.0%,respectively;SIC occupied 15.6,15.3 and 19.7%,respectively.The accumulation rates ofTSC under R.pseudoacacia,P.tabuliformis,and H.rhamnoides reached 159.5,112.4 and 102.5 g m-2a-1,respectively.The results demonstrate that afforestation on bare land has high potential for soil carbon accumulation on the Loess Plateau.Among the newly sequestrated total soil carbon,the heavy fraction(HF-SOC)with a slow turnover rate accounted for a considerably high percentage,suggesting that significant sequestrated carbon can be stored in soils following afforestation.Furthermore,afforestation induces SIC sequestration.Although its contribution to TSC accumulation was less than SOC,overlooking it may substantially underestimate the capacity of carbon sequestration after afforestation on the Loess Plateau.
Keywords Soil carbon sequestration·Soil organic carbon·Organic carbon fractions·Soil inorganic carbon·Afforestation
Soil carbon,the largest carbon pool in terrestrial ecosystems,has received considerable attention because of its influence on global warming(Schulze and Freibauer 2005;Mi et al.2008;Trumbore and Czimczik 2008;Wei et al.2012a).It is composed of soil organic carbon(SOC)and soil inorganic carbon(SIC)pools.SOC,as one of the most important indicators of soil quality,provides basic data for studying soil productivity,hydrology and greenhouse gas balances.Similarly,the variation of SIC also plays an important role in the dynamic changes in soil carbon pools and atmospheric CO2concentrations(Emmerich 2003;Singh et al.2007).Both the SOC and SIC may be greatly influenced by land use and land cover changes(LUCC)(Gamboa and Galicia 2011;Mujuru et al.2013;Yu et al.2014;Teferi et al.2016).During numerous patterns of LUCC,afforestation and its effect on SOC and SIC have attracted considerable attention(Wei et al.2012b;Korkanç2014;Cheng et al.2015;Hu et al.2016).
Generally,afforestation can elevate SOC stock by introducing plant litter from leaves and roots into the soil.The SOC pool can be subdivided into the light fraction of SOC(LF-SOC)and heavy fraction of SOC(HF-SOC),according to densities and turnover rates(Christensen 2001).The LF-SOC can represent small changes in the soil caused by human activities or natural changes before the variation in total soil carbon(TSC),which is a unstable,changing compose with strong biological activities in soil(Murage et al.2007).The HF-SOC is considerably more stable because of its lower decomposition rates due to varying degrees of physical and chemical protection(Golchin et al.1995).The HF-SOC plays an important role in the process of synthesis and decomposition of soil organic carbon.Based on the different turnover rates,changes in LF-SOC and HF-SOC reflect the stability of SOC following afforestation,which is crucial to assess whether afforestation can permanently fix atmospheric CO2in soils.However,the dynamics of LF-SOC and HF-SOC after afforestation have been rarely reported for arid and semiarid regions.Moreover,compared to the attention often given to SOC,the dynamics of SIC following afforestation have received much less consideration.Nevertheless,SIC is the dominate form of soil carbon in arid and semiarid areas and its subtle fluctuation has the potential to alter the balance of soil carbon pool in these regions(Mi et al.2008;Wang et al.2010).Although it was proposed that SIC could be induced by vegetation rehabilitation(Lal 2001,2009),relevant field data has been lacking.Some studies,which showed afforestation reduced or redistributed SIC,aggravated the complexity of SIC variation following afforestation(Sartori et al.2007;Chang et al.2012).
The Loess Plateau is the largest plateau in the world,and is covered by wind-blown silt or loess.It is important to global carbon cycles(Wang et al.2011).Afforestation withRobinia pseudoacacia,Pinus tabuliformisandHippophae rhamnoideshas been implemented to reduce soil erosion and improve the long-term environment.Recently,studies found that afforestation significantly increased SOC on the Loess Plateau(Qiu et al.2010;Chang et al.2011;Feng et al.2013;Zhan et al.2013),while the stability of the increased SOC is unknown.Additionally,there has been controversy about the impact of afforestation on the SIC on the Loess Plateau(Chang et al.2012;Tan et al.2014),indicating that the variation of SIC following afforestation needs to be reconfirmed in this region.Therefore,we measured TSC,SIC and SOC,as well as LF-SOC and HFSOC after plantingR.pseudoacacia(17 years),P.tabuliformis(20 years)andH.rhamnoides(15 years)on bare land(BL)on the Loess Plateau.The objectives of this study were to:(1)explore the responses of SOC and its two density fractions to afforestation;and,(2)assess the change in SIC following afforestation.
The study area is located at the Huaiping forest farm(34°47′–34°51′N and 108°05′–108°10′E)in Yongshou County,Shaanxi Province on the Loess Plateau of China.The region has a typical temperate continental climate with an elevation from 1123 to 1417 m.a.s.l.Mean annual temperature is 11.5°C and the average frost-free period lasts 163 days.Average annual precipitation is 501.7 mm with 48%occurring in summer.Mean annual evaporation is 1378.1 mm,which is greater than the average annual precipitation.The soil type is cinnamon soil(Chinese Soil Taxonomy)with pH 7.9 to 8.3.In the study site,afforestation on bare land withR.pseudoacacia,P.tabuliformis,andH.rhamnoideshas been implemented since the 1970s,and has made remarkable achievements.
In our study,four treatments were carried out:BL(control),R.pseudoacacia,P.tabuliformis,andH.rhamnoidesplantings on bare land(Table 1).
Three sample plots were selected within each treatment adjacent and 50 m apart.In October2014,three 10 m×10 m subplots were randomly established for soil sampling.In accordance with an S-shaped curve, five soil cores were removed using a soil auger(10 cm in diameter)at the surface soil layers(0–20 cm)after removing litter and were mixed to obtain a homogenized composite sample.The composites air-dried in the laboratory and sieved with a 2-mm mesh sieve for analysis.Soil bulk density was randomly sampled three times using a metal corer(100 cm3volume)and calculated from the dry weight of the volume.
The soil was divided into two portions based on density fractionation.The LF-SOC was isolated by flotation in a sodium iodide(NaI)solution.Ten grams of air-dried soil(<2 mm)was placed in a 100 ml centrifuge tube with 50 ml NaI(density 1.70 g cm-3).The material was shaken at 200 rpm for 1 h and centrifuged at 1000×g-force for 20 min.Material floating on the surface of the NaI solution was aspirated and filtered with a vacuum filter unit(with0.45 μm nylon filter paper).The shaking-centrifugation aspiration process was repeated twice.The sample on the nylon filter paper was rinsed thoroughly with 75 ml CaCl2solution(density 0.01 mol L-1)and 75 ml deionised water,collected in beaker and designated as LF-SOC.The light fractions were dried at 60°C for 72 h to a constant weight.
Table 1 General characteristics of the study site
The residual material in the centrifuge tube was resuspended with 100 ml deionised water and shaken for 10 min,then centrifuged for 15 min at 3000×g-force.This process was repeated three times.The sediment was transferred to a beaker and collected as HF-SOC.The heavy fractions were dried to a constant weight.
TSC(total soil carbon)was measured with a liqui TOC II total organic carbon analyzer(Elementar,Germany).SOC was determined using the K2Cr2O7-H2SO4oxidation method described by Walkley and Black(1934).SIC was calculated as the difference between total soil carbon and soil organic carbon(Chang et al.2012;Liu et al.2015).The LF-SOC was ground to pass through a 0.075 mm sieve and the organic carbon of the light fractions was determined using a Vario EL III elemental analyzer(Elementar,Germany).The organic carbon of the heavy fractions was also determined using the K2Cr2O7–H2SO4oxidation method as described by Walkley and Black(1934),because SIC may be contained in HF-SOC.
whereDis the soil depth(cm),Bis the soil bulk density(g cm-3),andCis the soil carbon content(g kg-1).
where SC is soil carbon per unit area in forested land(Mg ha-1),SC0is soil carbon per unit area in bare land(Mg ha-1),and n is planting years.
SPSS 13.5 software was used for all statistical analysis.Comparisons were examined using a one-way analyses of variance and the least significant difference test at a significance level of 0.05.
Fig.1 Total soil carbon(TSC),soil organic carbon(SOC)and soil inorganic carbon(SIC)in Robinia pseudoacacia(RP),Pinus tabuliformis(PT),and Hippophae rhamnoides(HR)plantations,and on bare land(BL)(mean±standard deviation).Means with letters are significantly different at the 0.05 level of significance(p<0.05)
Afforestation significantly enhanced soil carbon stock(Fig.1).InR.pseudoacaciaplantations,TSC reached 51.6 Mg ha-1,and was significantly higher than underH.rhamnoidesplantations(39.9 Mg ha-1)and on bare land(24.5 Mg ha-1).No significant differences were found betweenR.pseudoacaciaandP.tabuliformisplantations.Both SOC and SIC were increased by tree cover.SOC underR.pseudoacaciaandP.tabuliformisplantations showed no significant differences but were higher than under bare land(7.9 Mg ha-1).SOC underH.rhamnoidesplantations was 20.2 Mg ha-1,12.3 Mg ha-1higher than under bare land.SIC underR.pseudoacacia,P.tabuliformisandH.rhamnoidesplantations were 25.4,20.7 and 18.2%higher than under bare land(16.7 Mg ha-1),respectively.
Afforestation elevated the LF-SOC and HF-SOC stocks(Fig.2).LF-SOC stock underthe bare land was 0.3 Mg ha-1and significantly increased to 0.9,12.0 and 5.2 Mg ha-1underH.rhamnoides,P.tabuliformis,andR.pseudoacaciaplantations,respectively.HF-SOC stock on bare lands was 7.5 Mg ha-1;afforestation remarkably elevated it by 11.7 Mg ha-1forH.rhamnoides,7.1 Mg ha-1forP.tabuliformisand 17.7 Mg ha-1forR.pseudoacacia.Additionally,afforestation varied the proportions of LF-SOC and HF-SOC accounting for the SOC under theR.pseudoacaciaandP.tabuliformisplantations(Table 2).The proportion of LF-SOC in SOC increased from 4.2%under bare land to 44.7%under theP.tabuliformisplantation and 17.0%under theR.pseudoacaciaplantation,while the proportion of HF-SOC in SOC decreased from 95.4%on bare lands to 54.4%underP.tabuliformisplantations and 81.9%underR.pseudoacaciaplantations.
Fig.2 LF-SOC and HF-SOC stocks in Robinia pseudoacacia(RP)plantations,Pinus tabuliformis(PT)plantations,and Hippophae rhamnoides(HR)plantations,and bare lands(BL)(mean±standard deviation).Means with different letters within each treatment are significantly different at the 0.05 level of significance(p<0.05)
Table 2 The distribution of organic carbon in different fractions(%)
Afforestation of bare lands resulted in a greater increase in soil carbon stocks from land not planted with trees.The accumulation rates of TSC,SOC,SIC,HF-SOC and LFSOC under different afforested lands are shown in Table 3.The accumulation of TSC within the upper 20 cm of soil underR.pseudoacaciareached 159.5 g m-2a-1,55.6%higher than that underH.rhamnoidesand 41.9%higher than that underP.tabuliformis.Compared to theH.rhamnoidesplantation,the accumulation of SOC underR.pseudoacaciaandP.tabuliformiswas enhanced by 63.6%and 15.7%,respectively.TheP.tabuliformisplantation had the highest accumulation of LF-SOC,followed byR.pseudoacaciaandH.rhamnoides.But the accumulation of HF-SOC underP.tabuliformis(35.6 g m-2a-1)was the lowest.The rankings of accumulation of HF-SOC wasR.pseudoacacia>H.rhamnoides>P.tabuliformis.
The contribution of LF-SOC,HF-SOC andSIC to increased TSC after afforestation is shown in Fig.3.In theP.tabuliformisplantation,the proportion of LF-SOC,HFSOC and SIC in accumulated TSC reached 52.0,31.7 and 15.3%,respectively;in theH.rhamnoidesplantation,the LF-SOC,HF-SOC,and SIC made up 4.0,76.2 and 19.7%of the accumulated TSC,respectively;in theR.pseudoacaciaplantation,they occupied 18.0,65.2 and 15.6%of the newly formed TSC,respectively.In addition,Fig.3 also showed that more than 70%of the accumulated SOC was occupied by HF-SOC both underR.pseudoacaciaandH.rhamnoides.InP.tabuliformisplantations,this proportion was less than 40.0%,and 61.4%of the accumulated SOC was accounted by LF-SOC.
The results of this study indicate a significant increase in SOC(soil organic carbon)after plantingRobinia pseudoaccaia,Pinus tabuliformis,andHippophae rhamnoideson bare land(Fig.1).Our results are supported by Qiu et al.(2010),Wang et al.(2011)and Jiao et al.(2012),and thesestudies also illustrate the significant potential for SOC sequestration following afforestation on the Loess Plateau.A substantial carbon input,such as fine root mortality and leaf shedding,contributes to increase the SOC(Huang et al.2012).Compared with bare lands(BL),the plantations receive more roots and litter from tree cover,resulting in rapid soil organic carbon(SOC)accumulation.
Table 3 Accumulation of soil carbon under different forest species(g m-2a-1)
Fig.3 Contribution of LFSOC,HF-SOC,SIC,and some undetected soil carbon such as dissolved organic carbon(Others),to the accumulated total soil carbon under Robinia pseudoacacia(RP),Pinus tabuliformis(PT),and Hippophae rhamnoides(HR)plantations
Among the accumulated SOC both underR.pseudoaccaiaandH.rhamnoides,HF-SOC accounted for a large proportion.UnderP.tabuliformis,more than half of the increased SOC was accounted for LF-SOC(Fig.3).The difference betweenR.pseudoacaciaandP.tabuliformisplantations may be due to the different decomposition rates of forest litter.Lignin is lower in the leaves ofR.pseudoacaciaandH.rhamnoidesthan inP.tabuliformisneedles, which cannot be rapidly decomposed by microorganisms(Berg et al.1982;Aerts 1997).The distinction in chemical components between coniferous and deciduous leaves may result in different proportions of LFSOC in the increased soil organic carbon.Additionally,a high percentage of the HF-SOC in the increased soil organic carbon underR.pseudoacaciaandH.rhamnoidesplantations may be related to the mechanical component of soil in the Loess Plateau study area.The formation of HFSOC which is possibly hidden in microaggregates or adsorbed on the surface of mineral particles needs many silt and clay particles(Christensen 2001;Paul et al.2008).The fine particles of the Loess Plateau were relatively abundant which is likely suitable for forming a substantial amount of HF-SOC.It is stable and not easily decomposed and can be sustained for a long time(at least decades)in soil(Golchin et al.1995).Plantation ofR.pseudoacaciaandH.rhamnoidesyielded large amounts of HF-SOC,indicating afforesting with broad-leaved species on the Loess Plateau is an effective method for fixing SOC stably.
In our study,soil inorganic carbon(SIC)stocks under three different plantations were all significantly greater than under bare lands(Fig.1).In other areas of the Loess plateau,Zhang et al.(2012)reported that the density of SIC in shrublands is higher than in grasslands and croplands.Jin et al.(2014)found that forestlands showed higher SIC contents than grasslands.Similarly,Su et al.(2010),Li et al.(2012)and Liu et al.(2015)also found vegetation rehabilitation elevated the SIC content in sandy soils.These results demonstrate that SIC in arid and semiarid areas is not permanent and can be affected by afforestation.The mechanism of afforestation effects on varying SIC is not entirely certain.Pedogenic carbonate(PIC)formation under forested lands or carbonate erosion on bare lands may provide some answers.PIC is an important fraction of SIC and its accumulation involves two main reactions:
In general,an increase in soil CO2as a result of SOC decomposition and root respiration following afforestation(Zhang et al.2013)would lead to production of HCO3-.The accumulated HCO3-can drive reaction(4)to the right,resulting in carbonate precipitation(Wang et al.2015).The soil on our study site is alkaline with pH 7.9–8.3,and rich in available cations.Afforestation resulted in large quantities of leaf litter and root input into the soil and dramatically elevated the CO2concentration.Under alkaline conditions,the emitted CO2combining with available cations may cause continuous PIC accumulation following afforestation(Meyer et al.2014).
On the other hand,the difference of SIC stock between plantations and bare lands may be attributed to carbonate loss under bare lands.Vegetation on bare lands was sparse and provided limited soil protection,especially for the surface layer.The runoff,which contained masses of dissolved inorganic carbon,and the sediment discharge on bare lands,were much greater than for the plantations.Precipitation in the study area is not very significant but it is relatively centralized.Carbonate erosion by runoff may cause a lower SIC stock on bare lands.Overall,the plantations stored more SIC than bare lands indicating that forested lands have greater potential as an SIC sink than bare lands.The proportion of sequestered SIC in newly increased TSC exceeds 15%(Fig.3),suggesting that the variation of SIC cannot be overlooked in assessing the effects of afforestation on soil carbon,especially in the Loess Plateau.
The accumulation of TSC(total soil carbon)within the top 20 cm soil layers underR.pseudoacacia,P.tabuliformis,andH.rhamnoidesreached 159.5, 112.4 and 102.5 g m-2a-1,respectively (Table 3).Afforestation resulted in faster TSC accumulation rates than in the southern edge of the Badan Jaran Desert(Su et al.2010)and in the southern part of the Horqin Sandy Land(Li et al.2012),suggesting that afforestation on the Loess Plateau may have more potential for soil carbon sequestration than in other semiarid regions of northern China.Our results also provided a reference in species selection for better environmental contribution on the Loess Plateau.The accumulation rate of TSC underR.pseudoacaciawas higher than under bothP.tabuliformisandH.rhamnoides.Moreover,the accumulation rates of relatively stable HFSOC underR.pseudoacaciawas also highest among the three species,which was higher than that underP.tabuliformisandH.rhamnoidesby 192.2%and 33.3%(Table 3).Additionally,R.pseudoacaciacan adapt to local climate and edaphic conditions very well and be capable of covering large areas in a relatively short time.Therefore,R.pseudoacacia,as a rapidly growing species with high stable soil carbon accumulation rates,is the most conducive to sequester soil carbon among these three species on the Loess Plateau.
The results of changes in soil carbon and its fractions after afforestation demonstrated that tree planting on bare land has a high potential for total soil carbon(TSC)accumulation on the Loess Plateau.Among the newly sequestrated TSC,soil organic carbon(SOC)was the major portion.Within the newly increased SOC,the high-fraction of soil organic carbon(HF-SOC)with a slow turnover rate accounted for a considerably high percentage,suggesting that significant sequestrated carbon can be stably stored in soils following afforestation,which may be meaningful for fixing atmospheric CO2.Furthermore,we also found that afforestation induced soil inorganic carbon(SIC)sequestration.Although its contribution to TSC accumulation was relatively less than SOC,overlooking it may substantially underestimate the capacity of carbon sequestration following afforestation on the Loess Plateau.
AcknowledgementsThis study was supported by the twelfth Five-Year Plan of National Science and Technology in China(2012BAD22B0302).Additionally,the authors appreciate the editors for their assistance in polishing the language and editing this paper.
Journal of Forestry Research2018年5期