张艳丽
Avoiding the worst effects of climate change will require action. But its hard to take action when you dont even know theres a problem. Around the world, only half of adults understand that humans are causing climate change through activities that produce greenhouse gases. But the picture is different for kids. Previous work has shown that children are more engaged and more knowledgeable than adults are about climate change. The question is, can we harness this to make a difference?
“We had come across this idea that kids are capable of influencing their parents. And when we say influence, we really mean just teaching them,” said Daniella Lawson, a social scientist at NC State University. “Thats what we set out to really investigate: can we design things in such a way that kids are able to teach their parents about climate change? A parent is willing and able to listen to their children speaking to them instead of just an adult on the street or a different climate communicator.”
To test the idea, Lawson set up a wildlife?based climate course for kids. This approach was based on previous courses, but the team added a twist: involving the parents. First, parents were invited to come along to an event that formed a part of the course. And thats not all. “So we also had students interview their parents. And this interview never mentioned climate change specifically. But it had questions like: how have you seen the weather change over the last five to ten years? Do you believe the sea level is rising? How do you think that could impact our communities?”
The study showed that the course did indeed increase concern about climate change: not just among the kids, but their parents too. And there were some surprising findings in the results. “This process of children teaching their parents really was most effective among those parents who were previously the least concerned about climate change. So that was conservatives and fathers. And then what was also really exciting was that the treatment was particularly effective if the child that was doing the teaching was a daughter.” The study is in the journal Nature Climate Change. These findings come at a time when more kids are becoming climate activists. And Lawson says that her study shows just how persuasive young peoples voices can be.
1. What does the underlined word “harness” in paragraph one mean?
A. Review. B. Adopt. C. Control. D. Accumulate.
2. What can be learned from the first paragraph?
A. Adults and children will cooperate to deal with climate change.
B. Effective actions have been taken to deal with climate change.
C. Children better adults in the area of climate change and its effects.
D. Most adults have realized the climate damage caused by themselves.
3. About climate change teaching, which one will Daniella Lawson most probably agree with?
A. Adults can learn from the kids.
B. Kids can be taught by adults.
C. Climate communicators are more professional.
D. Parents are more likely to consult street adults.
4. What can be learned about the course?
A. The course involved is completely new.
B. Adults and kids study separately during the course.
C. The course is relatively effective in climate education.
D. Interviews and questionnaires are necessary in the course.
Difficult sentence
And then what was also really exciting was that the treatment was particularly effective if the child that was doing the teaching was a daughter.
【翻译】
【点石成金】这是一个主从复合句,what was also really exciting是what引导的主语从句,that the treatment was particularly effective是that引导的表语从句,if the child that was doing the teaching was a daughter是if引導的条件状语从句,其中that was doing the teaching是that引导的限制性定语从句。