周上军 周学鲁
[摘要] 目的 探讨腹腔镜下使用巴德Kugel补片免钉合技术修补腹股沟疝可行性、有效性和安全性。 方法 回顾性分析2014年1月~2016 年1月我科Kugel补片腹腔镜疝修补术(50 例)和开放疝修补术(50例)两组患者的资料。记录患者的手术时间、住院时间、术后并发症发生率和复发率。 结果 两组患者性别、年龄、疝类型、出血量和住院时间等无明显差异。腹腔镜组平均每侧手术时间(75.0±2.8)min,而开放组平均每侧时间(40.0±1.6)min,两组相比统计学有显著性差异(P<0.05)。腹腔镜组术后12个月视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)为(0.52±0.08)分,而开放组为(0.75±0.05)分,其中有慢性疼痛2例(各为5分和6分)(P<0.05)。腹腔镜组无血肿,而开放组术后2例血肿,存在差异明显(P<0.05)。此外开放组有1切口感染,但差异统计学无意义(P>0.05)。两组平均随访时间(26.0±1.6)个月。无复发病例(P>0.05)。 结论 采用Kugel补片腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术方法简单有效,安全可靠,具有术后疼痛少、费用低等优点。
[关键词] 腹股沟疝;全腹膜外疝修补术;Kugel补片;慢性疼痛
[中图分类号] R656.2 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2017)24-0053-04
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of Bard Kugel patch non-nailing technique in laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. Methods The data of the two groups of patients in Kugel patch laparoscopic hernia repair group (50 cases) and open hernia repair group (50 cases) from January 2014 to January 2016 in our department were retrospectively analyzed. The operation time, length of stay, postoperative complications and recurrence rate were recorded in the patients. Results There was no significant differences in gender, age, hernia type, bleeding volume and length of stay between the two groups. The average surgery time of each side was (75.0±2.8) min in the laparoscopic group, while the average time of each side was(40.0±1.6) min in the open group. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The 12-month visual analogue scale (VAS) in the laparoscopic group after the surgery was (0.52±0.08), while the open group was (0.75±0.05), including 2 cases of chronic pain (5 points and 6 points each) (P<0.05). Laparoscopic group was without hematoma, and open group had 2 cases of hematoma after surgery. There were significant differences(P<0.05). In addition, the open group had one case of wound infection, but there was no statistical significances (P>0.05). There were no recurrence cases during the average follow-up time of (26.0±1.6) months (P>0.05). Conclusion Kugel patch laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair method is simple, effective, safe and reliable, with the advantages of less postoperative pain and low cost.
[Key words] Inguinal hernia; Totally extraperitoneal prosthesis; Kugel patch; Chronic pain
腹股溝疝修补术是外科最常见的手术之一。由于传统手术并发症多、复发率高而逐步被无张力疝修补术取代,经过20多年的发展,有些术式如内环口成型术、网塞充填术等已经被淘汰[1]。“网塞技术逐渐褪去了在腹股沟疝修补领域独占鳌头的光芒,回归到了客观、真实的世界”[2]。腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair,LIHR)逐渐成为目前主要的术式[1]。目前LIHR大致分为经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP)、全腹膜外疝修补术(total extraperitoneal,TEP)、腹腔内补片植入术(intraperitoneal onlay mesh,IPOM)三种,每种术式各有优缺点。TEP术式由于它不穿透腹膜,从而避免了潜在的腹腔内并发症成为LIHR的首选术式。然而,目前LIHR所用补片种类繁多,补片的大小存在争议,并无统一标准。巴德Kugel补片多用于开放腹膜前修补术,其为双层结构,具有记忆弹力环、放置方便、无需固定、价格便宜和临床效果好等特点[3]。然而,是否可以将此补片用于LIHR目前尚无报道。因此我们从2014年1月~2016年1月采用Kugel补片行50例LIHR,研究Kugel补片在LIHR应用的可行性、有效性和安全性。endprint