Generation of conditional knockout alleles for PRL-3☆

2011-12-23 03:56HongYanDongKongXiaomeiGeXiangGaoXiaoHan
THE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH 2011年6期

Hong Yan , Dong Kong, Xiaomei Ge, Xiang Gao, Xiao Han

aKey Laboratory of Human Functional Genomics of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China; bModel Animal Research Center, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210093, China.

INTRODUCTION

The majority of cancer related deaths are induced by tumor metastasis and recent oncologic researches have focused on the mechanisms of metastasis. Protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) play a fundamental role in regulating diverse cellular processes, including cell proliferation, adhesion and migration[1]. Phosphatase of regenerating liver-3 (PRL-3) is a member of the protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) superfamily. Mouse PRL-2 and PRL-3 exhibit 87% and 76% homology to mouse PRL-1 in their amino acid sequences, and three mouse PRL proteins contain a Cterminal consensus sequence for prenylation[2]. PRL-3 encodes a small, -20 kDa tyrosine phosphatase that is located at the cytoplasmic membrane when prenylated at its C-terminus; however, the unprenylated PRL-3 is shifted into the nucleus[3]. The mouse PRL-3 gene has 6 exons, encompassing 30.36 kb of genomic DNA.

In human diseases, PRL-3 is highly expressed in cancer metastases. Moreover, overexpression of PRL-3 also facilitates the cells to form metastasis-like tumors in mouse models. High expression of PRL-3 has been found to be associated with human colorectal tumors[4-6]. We have reported that PRL-3 promoted motility and metastasis of mouse melanoma cells[7]. Recently, it has also been reported that silencing of the PRL-3 gene by siRNA reduced cell migration in the multiple myeloma cell line INA-6[8]. PRL-3 shows promise as a biomarker and prognostic indicator in colorectal, breast, lung and gastric cancers[9-12]. However, the substrates and molecular mechanisms of action of the PRLs have remained elusive. Recent findings indicate that PRL-3 may down-regulate PTEN expression and signal through PI3K to promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition[13]. In conclusion, PRL-3 is specifically expressed in malignant plasma cells and may have a role in regulating migration of these cells. The progression of other tumor types was positively correlated with PRL-3 expression[14], suggesting that PRL-3 is a molecular marker for metastatic tumor cells and could be an important target for anticancer therapeutics[5,15,16]. However, the substrates and molecular mechanism by which PRL-3 promotes tumor metastasis are far from clear. To further reveal the physiological significance of PRL-3, we created the PRL-3 conditional knockout mice through the CreloxP system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Construction of PRL-3 conditional gene-target vector

The PRL-3 conditional gene-targeting vector was made based on a BAC-retrieval strategy as described previously[17]. Briefly, the region of the BAC containing the loxP sites and positive and negative selection markers is then excised from the BAC and transformed into ES cells (BAC from Sanger, 129S7/AB2 clone). After validation by DNA sequencing, the BAC was electroporated into EL350[18]. Retrieval primers with Amp and TK using pL253 (pBluescriptbased vector) as template and in which the restriction sites for NotI and AvaI were removed. Restriction sites for these enzymes were included in the amplification primers to permit directional cloning of the PCR products into PL253. The 5′ homolog (5′-CTACCTCCTACACCTGAGAACAGCTCAGCACTCCACTCCAAGTCAGTGCCATGGCTCACAGCTAGTCCCTGCCACCATTC-gcggcc-GCACGAATGGGTTACATCGAACTGGATC-3′) and 3′ homolog (5′-CTGCCCAGGTCTTGATGTGGTGGTGACGGCTGTGTAGGCATTTGATGGCCTGTGATAGGTGGATGCTGAACTCCTCCTGG--TAGAACTAGTGGATCCTCTAGAGTCG-3′) were designed for retrieving. The next step was introduction of a loxP site into the subcloned DNA. PCR amplified 80-bp homologous arms loxPNEO-loxP cassette from PL452. This is accomplished by introducing a floxed neomycin resistance (Neo) cassette (PL452) via homologous recombination into the subcloned plasmid DNA, and by removing the DNA fragment between two loxp sites via Cre recombinase induced by 0.1% arabinose. Primers designed for inserting the first loxP between exon 4 and exon 5 were 1Lox-F (5′-GCAGGGAGGGCTTCCTGCTCTGATCCAGTCACTGCACCTCATGCAGAAAAAGAGCTGCCGCAAAGACATCCTGGTCATCCAGCAGCCCAATTCCGATCATATTCAATAACC -3′) and 1Lox-R (5′-CCTCCTGCAATAGGGGTGTCGGCAGGCGCTCTCCTGCCTGGCTCACTTCCATCTAGTGTGAGCAGCTGTGACTCAAGCAAGGGTCAAGCGCTCTAGAACTAGTGGATCCCCTCGAGGGACC-3′). Then, Prl-3 first loxP popped-out plasmid was transformed into EL250 with the final step the introduction of a second loxP site into the subcloned DNA. PCR amplified 80-bp homologous arm FRT-NEO-FRT-loxP cassette from PL451[17]. Primers 2Lox-F (5′-AGCCTCTCATCGCCTGCCATGTGGGAGCCTGTCTCCTGGCAGCATTGCATCCCTAGAGACCCTGTGCAGAGGTCGTGGGTAG_CGACGGTATCGATAAGCTTGATATCGAATTCC-3′) and 2Lox-R (5′-TCTGCTGAGCGAGAAGCCTGGCTTATCCAGATTCTGCACTGGGAAGAGAGGCCTTGTTCCAGGAAACTAACAGGCCAGGCTAGAGGT_GCTCTAGAACTAGTGGATCCACCTAATAACTTC-3′) were designed. Second PRL-3 loxP plasmids were transformed into DH-5α to get the purified targeting vector.

Generation and genotyping of conditional PRL-3 knockout mice

The gene-targeting vector was linearized with NotI and then electroporated into W4 ES cells. The transfected ES cells were selected with Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Media containing G418 (250 μg/mL) and gancyclovir (2 μmol/L). The double G418 and gancyclovir resistant ES clones were screened by PCR (forward: 5′-GAATCTTACAACCCAGCCCCAAC-3′, and reverse: 5′-ATGAGCATACTGAATGAGTCCACAC-3′). Southern blot analysis for the correct targeted allele using EcoRI digestion and the 3′external probe (SouthP3-forward: 5′-GTGGAAGACAGGGAGATACC-3′ and SouthP3-reverse: 5′-CAAGCTAGGAAACACTAGAACC-3′) and 5′ external probe (SouthP5-forward: 5′-CCTTGTTACTTCCACACCAG-3′ and SouthP5-reverse: 5′-TGAGAAACCCTGTATTACGTG-3′) were designed for Southern blots by detection of the EcoRI sites. The targeted ES clones were injected into blastocysts from c57BL/6J mice.

Chimeric mice were bred with CAGGS-Flpe (The Jackson Laboratory) transgenic mice to delete the FRT flanked Neo cassette to produce the PRL-3 flox allele, which was then bred with EIIa-Cre line to delete the floxed exon 4 to generate the PRL-3⊿exon4 mice. All these alleles were maintained in the c57BL/6J background.

Genotyping was determined by PCR analyses of genomic DNA isolated from mouse tails by proteinase K digestion and phenol/chloroform extraction. To genotype the PRL-3 flox allele, primers PRL-3-1F (5′-CAAGGTCTTTCTTTCACAGCCTGG -3′) and PRL-3-1R (5′-TGAGCATACTGAATGAGTCCACAC-3′) were designed to detect the loxP-FRT sites that remained after removal of the Neo cassette by Flpe-mediated recombination (Fig. 3A). To detect the deletion of the floxed exon 4 from the PRL-3 flox allele (Fig. 3B), primers PRL-3-1 F (5′-CACTCCCACTGTCCTTTCCT-3′) and PRL-3-1R (5′-GCCTGGCTCACTTCCATCTA-3′) were applied.

RT-PCR and Northern blot analysis

Total RNA of the heart, brain and muscle from wild type and Prl-3 homozygous mice were extracted using TRIzol (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), and 1 μg RNA was used for reverse transcription (RT) using PrimeScript (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). One μl RT was applied for PCR using a forward primer located in exon 2 and a reverse primer located in exon 6 (Fig. 3C). RT-PCR primer sequences were RT-forward (5′-TTCCTCATCACCCACAACC-3′) and RT-reverse (5′-AACCTCAGTCTCTGCTTAG-3′). Total RNA was prepared from the heart, muscle and brain using the Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, GIBCO-BRL, USA). Twenty μg RNA was subjected to electrophoresis in a 1.0% (w/v) agarose gel containing formalin. After transfer, the nylon membrane (Hybond N, Amersham Pharmacia) was hybridized with32P-labeled probes for mouse PRL-3. cDNA PCR fragments were used as probes for PRL-3, which were PRL-3 CDS182 (5′-ACGGCATCACTGTTGTG-3′) and PRL-3 CDS349 (5′-GAGCCACGAGCACTGG-3′).

General characteristics of PRL-3 knockout mice

We measured the body weights of PRL-3 homozygous (PRL-3-/-) mice and wildtype (PRL-3+/+) mice continuously for 9 weeks and established the growth curve of body weights of PRL-3 knockout mice. Each group had 9 mice and their body weights were measured in g at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 weeks. For further phenotype analysis, blood chemistry indicators were measured of the plasma of PRL-3-/-mice and PRL-3+/+mice. Each group has 8 mice, which had been fasted for 16 h before sacrifice. Blood collected from mice were put into Eppendorf tubes for aqueous bath at 37°C for 30 min. Then, blood samples were centrifugated at 3,000 rpm for 10 min and the plasma was separated and collected. We detected the plasma levels of cholesterol, triglycereide, high density lipoproteins, low density lipoproteins (LDL) and glucose in PRL-3-/-and PRL-3+/+mice.

Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) was then performed in six PRL-3-/-mice and six PRL-3+/+mice were selected at 12 weeks of age. Glucose tolerance measurement was conducted at the second morning after fasting 16 h overnight. Mice were intraperitoneally injected with D-α glucose (0.15 g/mL, dilute in MillQ) at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg. Finally, the values of blood glucose were measured at 0, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min by using Blood Glucose Test Strips.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed with Student's t-test and presented as mean±SD. P < 0.05 was considered to have significant difference.

RESULTS

To establish the conditional knockout alleles through Cre-mediated excision, we decided to target exon 4 of the PRL-3 gene by flanking it with two loxP sites. Deletion of exon 4 is predicted to generate a nonfunctional prematurely terminated short peptide as it will cause a frame-shift mutation. We applied a BAC retrieval strategy as described previously[17]to construct the PRL-3 conditional gene-targeting vector, which contained 5'-and 3'-homology arms, FRT flanked Neo cassette, floxed exon 4 and the HSV-TK negative selection marker (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 Gene-targeting strategy for constructing the PRL-3 conditional knockout alleles

For gene targeting, 20 μg of NotI linearized targeting vector[19]DNA was electroporated into 1×107W4 ES cells. Positive clones were obtained after G418 selection and screened by long-range PCR. The PCR primers are depicted in Fig. 1. Two clones had undergone correct homologous recombination on the 3' site and 5' site and that the two loxP sites were properly inserted.

Targeted clones were further confirmed by Southern blot with 5'-and 3'-probes (Fig. 2). Introduction of an additional EcoRI restriction enzyme site was used to differentiate wildtype (22 kb) versus PRL-3-flox mutated allele (12.7 kb, 8.5 kb) (Fig. 2A, 2B). After confirmation by Southern blots, positive clones were then used to produce chimera by c57BL/6J blastocyst injection. Twenty-one chimeras (10 females and 11 males) were obtained. After crossing with c57BL/6J mice, 4 out of 10 female chimeric mice and 5 out of 11 male chimeric mice were identified to be capable of germline transmission. The pups of chimeric mice were also genotyped by Southern blot to check whether they contained the loxP mutation. To test Cre-mediated recombination of the PRL-3floxed allele, we crossed PRL-3floxedmice with EIIA-Cre transgenic mice (FVB/N-TgN(EIIa-Cre)C5379Lmgd, the Jackson Laboratory). The pups (PRL-3+/-mice) that had undergone Cre-mediated recombination were identified by PCR (Fig. 3A). Then, PRL-3+/-mice were back-crossed to c57BL/6J background. PRL-3-/-mice were obtained by inter-crossing of heterozygous mice (Fig. 3B).

RT-PCR analysis of PRL-3 expression in the heart, muscle and brain tissues of wildtype mice and prl-3-/-mice were performed simultaneously. The PCR products from the tissues of PRL-3-/-mice were 294 bp while the PCR products from the wildtype mice were 425 bp (Fig. 3C). Northern blot analysis of prl-3 expression in the heart, muscle and brain tissues of wildtype mice and prl-3+/-mice were performed simultaneously (Fig. 4).

The growth curve of PRL-3-/-mice and PRL-3+/+mice exhibited no significant difference (P > 0.05) (Fig. 5A). Blood chemistry indicators of PRL-3-/-mice and PRL-3+/+mice were measured. We detected cholesterol, triglycereide, high density lipoproteins, LDL and glucose. There was no significant difference in blood chemistry indicators in the homozygous type and wide type (P > 0.05, Fig. 5B). The IPGTT results suggested that the glucose level of PRL-3-/-mice was significantly lower than of PRL-3+/+mice after 16 h fasting (Fig. 5C).

Fig. 2 Southern blots analysis.

DISCUSSION

PRL-3 has been shown to play an important role in promoting cell migration and tumor metastasis. It has been reported that PRL-3 exerts its functions by modulating the Rho family GTPase, activating Src, and regulating the PI3K-Akt pathway in a contextdependent manner[20]. In this study, we applied a rapid and efficient method for constructing conditional knockout alleles for PRL-3 that is based on E. coli recombineering rather than restriction enzymes and DNA ligases.

To test whether the neo gene and exon 4 in the PRL-3 floxed allele had been deleted, the heterozygous(PRL-3 floxed) mice with Cre recombinase were crossed with the EIIa-Cre transgenic mice which express Cre recombinase in the germline. The offspring PRL-3+/-mice were identified by PCR products. Moreover, to further determine the accuracy of PRL-3 recombination in mice, we generated homozygous PRL-3 null mice. To demonstrate correct PRL-3 knockout mice, we detected PRL-3 mRNA expression in the heart, muscle and brain tissues isolated from wildtype mice and PRL-3-/-mice simultaneously. Additionally, the sequencing results and Northern blot analysis demonstrated successful knockout in mRNA level (data not shown). However, Western blotting examination of protein expression in the tissues extracted from wildtype and PRL-3-/-mice separately could not be obtained. Only in the metastasis tissues or tumors extracted from the wildtype mice, high expression level of PRL-3 protein could have been proved. Previous reports suggested that PRL-3 is the only gene consistently overexpressed in 100% of 18 colorectal cancer liver metastases, which indicates that PRL-3 plays an important role in tumor metastasis[4,21].

Fig. 3 Genotyping by PCR assays.

Fig. 4 Northern blot analysis.

Fig. 5 Phenotypic analysis of the PRL-3-/- mice and PRL-3+/+ mice.

Further tests were performed to screen the phenotype of the PRL-3 knockout mice. We established growth curve for PRL-3-/-mice and PRL-3+/+mice and found no significant difference in their body weights. Blood chemistry indicators of PRL-3-/-mice and PRL-3+/+mice were also measured. Finally, we compared the levels of glucose and indicators of lipid metabolism related factors between the homozygous and wildtype mice, and found no significant difference. However, PRL-3-/-mice exhibited abnormal response to IPGTT, which indicated that the mice might be used for further glucose metabolism related investigations. It has been previously reported that PRL-3 has some homology with PTEN in the phosphatase active site and flanking regions, and may act as a lipid phosphatase at the cytoplasmic face of the plasma membrane[21,22].

In conclusion, we successfully generated the conditional knockout alleles for PRL-3, allowing Cremediated inactivation of PRL-3 during mouse development and in specific adult tissues. Moreover, our conditional PRL-3 knockout mice will be a valuable tool for uncovering the role of PRL-3 and its substrates in tumor metastasis that may be new potential therapeutic targets for cancer treatment.

[1] Ostman A, Hellberg C, Böhmer FD. Protein-tyrosine phosphatases and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2006;6:307-20.

[2] Zeng Q, Hong W, Tan YH. Mouse PRL-2 and PRL-3, two potentially prenylated protein tyrosine phosphatases homologous to PRL-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;2:421-7.

[3] Zeng Q, Si X, Horstmann H, Xu Y, Hong W, Pallen CJ. Prenylation-dependent association of protein-tyrosine phosphatases PRL-1, -2, and -3 with the plasma membrane and the early endosome. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:21444-52.

[4] Saha S, Bardelli A, Buckhaults P, Velculescu VE, Rago C, St Croix B, et al. A phosphatase associated with metastasis of colorectal cancer. Science 2001;294:1343-6.

[5] Peng L, Ning J, Meng L, Shou C. The association of the expression level of protein tyrosine phosphatase PRL-3 protein with liver metastasis and prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2004; 130:521-6.

[6] Zhao GP, Zhou ZG, Lei WZ, Yu YY, Zheng XL, Gao HK. Expression of phosphatase of regenerating liver-3 mRNA and its clinical implications in human colorectal carcinoma. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2005; 8:237-40.

[7] Wu X, Zeng H, Zhang X, Zhao Y, Sha H, Ge X, et al. Phosphatase of regenerating liver-3 promotes motility and metastasis of mouse melanoma cells. Am J Pathol 2004;164:2039-54.

[8] Fagerli UM, Holt RU, Holien T, Vaatsveen TK, Zhan F, Egeberg KW, et al. Overexpression and involvement in migration by the metastasis-associated phosphatase PRL-3 in human myeloma cells. Blood 2008;111:806-15.

[9] Yamashita S, Masuda Y, Matsumoto K, Okumura Y, Matsuzaki H, Kurizaki T, et al. Down-regulation of the human PRL-3 gene is associated with the metastasis of primary non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;13:236-9.

[10] Wang Y, Li ZF, He J, Li YL, Zhu GB, Zhang LH, et al. Expression of the human phosphatases of regenerating liver (PRLs) in colonic adenocarcinoma and its correlation with lymph node metastasis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007; 22:1179-84.

[11] Miskad UA, Semba S, Kato H, Matsukawa Y, Kodama Y, Mizuuchi E, et al. High PRL-3 expression in human gastric cancer is a marker of metastasis and grades of malignancies: an in situ hybridization study. Virchows Arch 2007;450:303-10.

[12] Li Z, Zhan W, Wang Z, Zhu B, He Y, Peng J, et al. Inhibition of PRL-3 gene expression in gastric cancer cell line SGC7901 via microRNA suppressed reduces peritoneal metastasis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006; 348:229-37.

[13] Wang H, Quah SY, Dong JM, Manser E, Tang JP, Zeng Q. PRL-3 down-regulates PTEN expression and signals through PI3K to promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Res 2007;67:2922-6.

[14] Stephens BJ, Han H, Gokhale V, Von Hoff DD. PRL phosphatases as potential molecular targets in cancer. Molecular cancer therapeutics 2005;4:1653-61.

[15] Bardelli A, Saha S, Sager JA, Romans KE, Xin B, Markowitz SD, et al. PRL-3 expression in metastatic cancers. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:5607-15.

[16] Miskad UA, Semba S, Kato H, Yokozaki H. Expression of PRL-3 phosphatase in human gastric carcinomas: close correlation with invasion and metastasis. Pathobiology 2004;71:176-84.

[17] Liu P, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG. A highly efficient recombineering-based method for generating conditional knockout mutations. Genome Res 2003;13:476-84.

[18] Lee EC, Yu D, Martinez de Velasco J, Tessarollo L, Swing DA, Court DL, et al. A highly efficient Escherichia coli-based chromosome engineering system adapted for recombinogenic targeting and subcloning of BAC DNA. Genomics 2001;73:56-65.

[19] Zhang YL, Tan XH, Xiao MF, Li H, Mao YQ, Yang X, et al. Establishment of liver specific glucokinase gene knockout mice: a new animal model for screening antidiabetic drugs. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2004;25:1659-65.

[20] Peng L, Xing X, Li W, Qu L, Meng L, Lian S, et al. PRL-3 promotes the motility, invasion, and metastasis of LoVo colon cancer cells through PRL-3-integrin beta1-ERK1/2 and-MMP2 signaling. Mol Cancer 2009;8:110.

[21] Zeng Q, Dong JM, Guo K, Li J, Tan HX, Koh V, et al. PRL-3 and PRL-1 promote cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Cancer Res 2003; 63:2716-22.

[22] Diamond RH, Cressman DE, Laz TM, Abrams CS, Taub R. PRL-1, a unique nuclear protein tyrosine phosphatase, affects cell growth. Mol Cell Biol 1994;14:3752-62.