Mutational screening of affected cardiac tissues and peripheral blood cells identified novel somatic mutations in GATA4 in patients with ventricular septal defect☆

Chunyn Cheng, Yun Lin, Fn Yng, Wenjing Wng, Chong Wu, Jingli Qin, Xiuqin Sho,Lei Zhou*

aDepartment of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China;

bDepartment of Human Population Genetics, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.

INTRODUCTION

Ventricular septal defect (VSD)is the most common cardiac developmental defect and accounts for about 20% of the overall congenital heart diseases (CHDs). Although 40%-50% of VSDs may not present clinical symptoms and 15%-20% exhibit spontaneous closure before adolescence, 20%-30%remain patent during the patient’s life time. The latter could lead to severe cardiac dysfunction and potential complications, such as infective endocarditis, aortic regurgitation, as well as symptomatic arrhythmias and atrial fibrillation[1-3].

Cardiac development is a complicated process that is controlled temporally and spatially, and involves an array of genes that are switched on-or-off in an orderly fashion[4-9]. The process is also profoundly impacted by environmental factors. Over the past few years, a great effort has been made to identify genes that are critical for cardiac development by using genetic approaches. This has resulted in the identification of a number of genes, such as GATA4, NKX2.5, TBX5,TBX1, Smad4, FOG2, and MEF2[5,10-13]. Among these genes, NKX2.5 and TBX5 were found to cause atrial septum defect (ASD), while GATA4 is mainly responsible for VSD, when mutated[14-16].

To date, approximately 30 GATA4 mutations have been identified since the first mutation of GATA4 was reported, in 2003, to be a causative mutation for VSD[17-22]. Recently, new evidence has emerged,which showed that numerous genetic mutations are likely to be somatic, because most CHDs are sporadic and not inherited from the parents. Only a very small percentage of the disease show family aggregation.This indicates that we have possibly underestimated the genetic contribution to CHDs, due to the fact that most of the mutational screenings were carried out only on peripheral blood cells, and not on the affected cardiac tissues.

In this study, we attempted to identify whether more genetic variants of GATA4 exist in affected cardiac tissue than in peripheral blood cells. This was accomplished by performing a mutational analysis of genomic DNA from cardiac tissues and white blood cells obtained from patients with VSD. We identified seven novel genetic variants in cardiac tissues that were not found in peripheral blood cells of VSD patients or in 500 healthy control samples. Our data suggests that the genetic contribution to somatic mutation of GATA4 has been underestimated in sporadic VSD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients

Twenty patients with sporadic VSD were recruited and surgically treated in the Department of Thoracic-Cardiac Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from 2000 to 2009. Signed informed consent forms were obtained from the patients or their tegal sunogates. Septial tissues were obtained from surgically abandoned cardiac tissues.Three milliliters of peripheral blood was collected into an EDTA-anticoagulant treated tube from each participant prior to surgery. Ten septial tissues were gathered from unmatched transplant hearts that did not present VSD. All tissues were stored in liquid nitrogen until used. In addition, 500 healthy individuals from our community hospitals donated blood samples that were used as controls in this study. All participants were from Han Chinese nationality. The study procedures were approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, and all patients signed the informed consent.

Methods

Extraction of genomic DNA

Genomic DNA was extracted from freshly frozen cardiac tissues and peripheral blood leukocytes by proteinase K methods as previously described[23].

Primer design and DNA amplification

Seventeen pairs of primers were selected to amplify all exons and intron-exon joint regions of the GATA4 gene. To amplify the target DNA regions, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)was performed in a 25 μL system (1×PCR buffer, 0.05 mmol/L dNTP,0.2 μmol/L each primer, 5 ng template of genomic DNA, and 1U Taq DNA polymerase). The thermal cycles included 95°C for 3 min followed by 45-50 cycles consisting of 95°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 45 sec,and 72°C for 45 sec. PCR was terminated by a final extension at 72°C for 2 min. The PCR products were then purified using PEG method and stored at 4°C prior to use.

DNA Sequencing

DNA sequencing was performed according to the standard protocol from the manufacturer (Applied Biosystems, Foster city, CA, USA), and 3 ng of amplified DNA fragments were used in sequencing reaction.The sequencing products were purified and subjected to sequencing using the ABI PRISM 3130XL Automatic DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster city, CA, USA). A mutation was claimed when a variant fits the criteria of 1)missense, 2)occurrence at an evolutionarily conserved region, 3)significant change of an amino acid, and/or 4)＜1% in its frequency.

Validation

All variants, once found in either cardiac tissues or blood cells, were tested in 10 non-VSD cardiac tissues and 500 healthy individuals. The allele frequencies were calculated.

Bioinformatics analysis

The potential effects of genetic variants on regulatory motif binding sites, exon-intron splicing, and miRNA binding sites were bioinformatically evaluated if they were in the 5’-UTR region, exon-intron joint regions, and 3’-UTR, respectively. The analyses were implemented using web-based tools (Human Splicing Finder at http://www.umd.be/HSF/; Searching Transcription Factor Binding Sites ver 1.3 at http://www.cbrc.jp/research/db/TFSEARCH.html; ENCODE Transcription Factor Binding Tracks at http://genome.ucsc.edu/).

RESULTS

Patient information

Twenty sporadic VSD patients were recruited, who were from the ages of 2.5 to 27 years (Table 1). Fivehundred individuals without VSD were recruited as controls for validation of mutations.

Table 1 Sporadic VSD patients for the detection of GATA4 mutations

Identification of genetic variants in GATA4

Seven novel heterozygous variants were detected in the GATA4 gene with primers listed in Table 2. We designed three pairs of primers for exon2 and nine pairs of primers for exon7 respectively as the sequences of the two exons are too long. and expressed based on the international nomenclature (Fig. 1 and Table 3).Among seven, two were in the 5’ UTR (c.-251C＞T and c.-248C＞T), two in introns (c.783+27T＞A, intron 3; C.997+100C＞T, intron 5), one in exon (c.1004C＞A,exon 6), one in the 3’ UTR (c.*645G＞A), and one in the 3’ flanking region (*17T＞G)of the GATA4 gene.None of these variants were detected in the control blood and tissue. We replicated fourteen reported single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). No significant differences were found in the allele frequencies of these SNPs between VSD patients and normal controls.

Functional implications

The potential functional effects of these variants were evaluated by bioinformatics analysis (Table 3).It was found that the c.1004C＞A (p.S335X)is a nonsense mutation that leads to the production of a truncated GATA4 protein. The variant c.-248C＞T shifted motif from ets-1 to CNTF, while c.783+27T＞A and c.997+100C＞T potentially affected RNA splicing. The variants c.*645G＞A and *17T＞G introduced motifs swi-5 and mef-2a, respectively.

DISCUSSION

GATA4 is an important transcription factor involved in cardiogenesis and in the regulation of expression of a set of cardiac genes[10,19,24-26]. The most important finding in this study was the identification of seven novel heterozygous genetic variants within the GATA4 gene from VSD cardiac tissue and, thatthe novel genes were not found within the peripheral blood cells or 500 control samples. This indicated that most of the mutations that cause VSD are likely somatic and enriched in the affected cardiac tissues.Bioinformatics analysis implied that these variants potentially affected motif-binding sites and splicing.We also identified that the variant p.S335X led to the premature termination of translation, producing a truncated GATA4 protein. No functions were predicted for c.-251C＞T, suggesting it was likely a rare SNP.The variants covered whole GATA4 from 5’ UTR,coding regions, 3’-UTR, and 3’-gene flanking region.

Table 2 Primers for PCR and sequencing

Fig. 1 Genetic variants of GATA4 screened in this study

Table 3 Functional predictions of variants detected in this study

Fig.2 Conservative analysis of genetic variants screened in this study

Accumulating evidence has defined GATA4 as a key gene for the pathogenesis of abnormal cardiac development. Our previous study had identified that the transcription factor GATA4 was down-regulated in VSD patients[27]. It has been well-documented that mutations in GATA4 are associated with a number of congenital heart defects including ventricular septal defect, atrial septal defect, Tetralogy of Fallot, endocardial cushion defect, right ventricular hypoplasia,and double-inlet left ventricle[2,18,25,28,29]. However, it has also been noticed that most congenital heart diseases are sporadic and not inherited from the parents,which suggests that genetic mutations are likely somatic. It was previously found that there is a very high mutational rate in formalin fixed malformed cardiac tissues (23 out of 68)when compared with the mutation rate in peripheral blood samples[30]. This provides a notion that we may have underestimated the genetic contribution to congenital heart disease due to the fact most of the mutational screenings were only carried out on the peripheral blood cells and not on the affected cardiac tissues. Our study, for the first time,has demonstrated that the mutational rate in freshly frozen cardiac tissue is much greater than that in peripheral blood cells (7/20 vs 0/20)in the Chinese population and provides direct evidence that the genetic contribution of GATA4 to VSD is strikingly underestimated.

Genetic variants cause various functional altercations. To predict the possible mechanism by which the mutations identified in our study are associated with VSD, we performed bioinformatics analysis.We found that the mutations potentially impaired transcription and protein structure/function. For example, c.-248C＞T, c.*645G＞A, and *17T＞G modified the regulatory motif binding sites critical for cardiac development. The variants c.783+27T＞A and c.997+100C＞T may potentially influence splicing. Notably, p.S335X caused a truncation of GATA4 protein,leading to a significant functional change.

In conclusion, we performed a systemic screening for genetic mutations of the GATA4 gene in cardiac tissue and blood cells. We identified seven novel genetic variants in VSD cardiac tissues that were not found in periphery blood cells or in the 500 controls.These genetic variants may be associated with VSD through multiple mechanisms. Our data suggests that genetic contribution of somatic mutation of GATA4 has been underestimated in sporadic VSD, and that mutational screening of genomic DNA from blood cells is insufficient for determining if a VSD patient carries a genetic mutation of GATA4.

[1]Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1890-900.

[2]Rajagopal SK, Ma Q, Obler D, Shen J, Manichaikul A,Tomita-Mitchell A, et al. Spectrum of heart disease associated with murine and human GATA4 mutation. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2007;43:677-85.

[3]Neumayer U, Stone S, Somerville J. Small ventricular septal defects in adults. Eur Heart J 1998;19:1573-82.

[4]Lagendijk AK, Smith KA, Bakkers J. Genetics of congenital heart defects: a candidate gene approach. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2010;20:124-8.

[5]Schlesinger J, Schueler M, Grunert M, Fischer JJ, Zhang Q, Krueger, T, et al. The cardiac transcription network modulated by Gata4, Mef2a, Nkx2.5, Srf, histone modifications, and microRNAs. PLoS Genet 2011;7:e1001313.

[6]Richards AA, Garg V. Genetics of congenital heart disease. Curr Cardiol Rev 2010;6:91-7.

[7]Lopez-Sanchez C, Garcia-Martinez V. Molecular determinants of cardiac specification. Cardiovasc Res 2011;91:185-95.

[8]Huang JB, Liu YL, Sun PW, Lv XD, Du M, Fan XM.Molecular mechanisms of congenital heart disease. Cardiovasc Pathol 2010;19:e183-93.

[9]Komuro I. Molecular mechanism of cardiac hypertrophy and development. Jpn Circ J 2001;65:353-8.

[10]Oka T, Maillet M, Watt AJ, Schwartz RJ, Aronow BJ,Duncan SA, et al. Cardiac-specific deletion of Gata4 reveals its requirement for hypertrophy, compensation, and myocyte viability. Circ Res 2006;98:837-45.

[11]Nakashima Y, Ono K, Yoshida Y, Kojima Y, Kita T,Tanaka M, et al. The search for Nkx2-5-regulated genes using purified embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes with Nkx2-5 gene targeting. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009;390:821-6.

[12]Zhang LF, Gui YH, Wang YX, Jiang Q, Song HY. Effect of Tbx1 knock-down on cardiac performance in zebrafish. Chin Med J (Engl)2010;123:1182-9.

[13]Moskowitz IP, Wang J, Peterson MA, Pu WT, Mackinnon AC, Oxburgh L, et al. Transcription factor genes Smad4 and Gata4 cooperatively regulate cardiac valve development. [corrected]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:4006-11.

[14]Hirayama-Yamada, Kamisago M, Akimoto K, Aotsuka H,Nakamura Y, Tomita H, et al. Phenotypes with GATA4 or NKX2.5 mutations in familial atrial septal defect. Am J Med Genet A 2005;135:47-52.

[15]Boogerd CJ, Dooijes D, Ilgun A, Mathijssen IB, Hordijk R, van de Laar IM, et al. Functional analysis of novel TBX5 T-box mutations associated with Holt-Oram syndrome. Cardiovasc Res 2010;88:130-9.

[16]Stallmeyer B, Fenge H, Nowak-Gottl U, Schulze-Bahr E.Mutational spectrum in the cardiac transcription factor gene NKX2.5 (CSX)associated with congenital heart disease. Clin Genet 2010:78:533-40.

[17]Garg V, Kathiriya IS, Barnes R, Schluterman MK, King IN, Butler CA, et al. GATA4 mutations cause human congenital heart defects and reveal an interaction with TBX5. Nature 2003;424:443-7.

[18]Zhang W, Li X, Shen A, Jiao W, Guan X, Li Z. GATA4 mutations in 486 Chinese patients with congenital heart disease. Eur J Med Genet 2008;51:527-35.

[19]Chen MW, Pang YS, Guo Y, Pan JH, Liu BL, Shen J, et al. GATA4 mutations in Chinese patients with congenital cardiac septal defects. Pediatr Cardiol 2010;31:85-9.

[20]Peng T, Wang L, Zhou SF, Li X. Mutations of the GATA4 and NKX2.5 genes in Chinese pediatric patients with non-familial congenital heart disease. Genetica 2010;138:1231-40.

[21]Liu XY, Wang J, Zheng JH, Bai K, Liu ZM, Wang XZ,et al. Involvement of a novel GATA4 mutation in atrial septal defects. Int J Mol Med 2011;28:17-23.

[22]Tomita-Mitchell A, Maslen CL, Morris CD, Garg V,Goldmuntz E. GATA4 sequence variants in patients with congenital heart disease. J Med Genet 2007;44:779-83.

[23]Tian XL, Wang QK. Generation of transgenic mice for cardiovascular research. Methods Mol Med 2006;129:69-81.

[24]Xin M, Davis CA, Molkentin JD, Lien CL, Duncan SA, Richardson JA, et al. A threshold of GATA4 and GATA6 expression is required for cardiovascular development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:11189-94.

[25]Reamon-Buettner SM, Cho SH, Borlak J. Mutations in the 3’-untranslated region of GATA4 as molecular hotspots for congenital heart disease (CHD). BMC Med Genet 2007;8:38.

[26]Suzuki YJ. Cell signaling pathways for the regulation of GATA4 transcription factor: Implications for cell growth and apoptosis. Cell Signal 2011;23:1094-9.

[27]Zhang H, Zhou L, Yang R, Sheng Y, Sun W, Kong X,et al. Identification of differentially expressed genes in human heart with ventricular septal defect using suppression subtractive hybridization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006;342:135-44.

[28]Nemer G, Fadlalah F, Usta J, Nemer M, Dbaibo G, Obeid M, et al. A novel mutation in the GATA4 gene in patients with Tetralogy of Fallot. Hum Mutat 2006;27:293-4.

[29]Butler TL, Esposito G, Blue GM, Cole AD, Costa MW,Waddell LB, et al. GATA4 mutations in 357 unrelated patients with congenital heart malformation. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2010;14:797-802.

[30]Reamon-Buettner SM, Borlak J. GATA4 zinc finger mutations as a molecular rationale for septation defects of the human heart. J Med Genet 2005;42:e32.

[31]Ye MQ, Coldren C, Liang XQ, Mattina T, Goldmuntz E, Benson DW, et al. Deletion of ETS-1, a gene in the Jacobsen syndrome critical region, causes ventricular septal defects and abnormal ventricular morphology in mice. Hum Mol Genet 2010;19:648-656.

[32]Wang X, Halvorsen SW. Reciprocal regulation of ciliary neurotrophic factor receptors and acetylcholine receptors during synaptogenesis in embryonic chick atria. J Neurosci 1998;18:7372-80.

[33]Schlesinger J, Schueler M, Grunert M, Fischer JJ, Zhang Q, Krueqer T, et al. The cardiac transcription network modulated by Gata4, Mef2a, Nkx2.5, Srf, histone modifications, and microRNAs. PLoS Genet 2011;7:e1001313.