Wei-Tao Yan , Wen-Juan Zhao , Xi-Min Hu, Xiao-Xia Ban Wen-Ya Ning, Hao Wan Qi Zhang , Kun Xiong
Abstract PANoptosis is a newly identified type of regulated cell death that consists of pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis, which simultaneously occur during the pathophysiological process of infectious and inflammatory diseases. Although our previous literature mining study suggested that PANoptosis might occur in neuronal ischemia/reperfusion injury, little experimental research has been reported on the existence of PANoptosis. In this study, we used in vivo and in vitro retinal neuronal models of ischemia/reperfusion injury to investigate whether PANoptosis-like cell death (simultaneous occurrence of pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis) exists in retinal neuronal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Our results showed that ischemia/reperfusion injury induced changes in morphological features and protein levels that indicate PANoptosis-like cell death in retinal neurons both in vitro and in vivo. Ischemia/reperfusion injury also significantly upregulated caspase-1, caspase-8, and NLRP3 expression, which are important components of the PANoptosome. These results indicate the existence of PANoptosis-like cell death in ischemia/reperfusion injury of retinal neurons and provide preliminary experimental evidence for future study of this new type of regulated cell death.
Key Words: apoptosis; gasdermin-D (GSDMD); ischemia/reperfusion; mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL); necroptosis; NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3); PANoptosis; pyroptosis; receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIPK3); retinal neuron
Introduction 357 Methods 357 Results 359 Discussion 362
Graphical Abstract
PANoptosis-like cell death kills retinal neurons following OGD/R and aHIOP injury
in vitro
andin vivo
I/R models (OGD/R and acute high intraocular pressure [aHIOP]) of retinal neurons to investigate the existence of PANoptosis-like cell death under experimental conditions.Animals and aHIOP model
The animals used in the experiment were male Sprague-Dawley rats (n
= 90) with a weight range of 250–300 g and an age of 8 weeks. The experiments were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Basic Medical School of Central South University on March 2, 2021 (approval No. 2021-XMSB-0002). The animals were purchased from the Hunan STJ Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd (Hunan, China) (license No. SCXK (Xiang) 2019-0004), and the experimental protocols and operating procedures were in accordance with the Guidelines for Animal Experiments of Central South University under the Law of Animal Protection and Management of the Chinese Government. Rats were randomly divided into three groups using a random number table: Sham, aHIOP, and aHIOP + inhibitor (n
= 30 rats/group).An aHIOP model was prepared using previously reported methods (Rosenbaum et al., 1998, 2001; Huang et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2020). Sprague-Dawley rats were intraperitoneally injected with 2% pentobarbital sodium (40 mg/kg; FWD Chem Co., Shanghai, China) to ensure that the animals were generally anesthetized. A sterilized 30-gauge needle was inserted into the anterior chamber of one randomly selected eye (this eye was then referred to as the ocular hypertension [OHT] eye) of the rats, and normal saline (NS) was injected into the anterior chamber through an intravenous tube to generate artificial intraocular pressure (IOP).
IOP was slowly increased to 110 mmHg and maintained for 60 minutes by adjusting the NS volume based on the IOP, which was measured with the hand-held tonometer Tono-Pen XL (Medtronic Inc., Jacksonville, FL, USA). Then, IOP was gradually returned to normal level and maintained for 48 hours before retinal tissue collection. In the Sham group, a sterilized 30-gauge needle was inserted into the anterior chamber of the eyes without elevating the IOP. Specific inhibitors for RCDs were usedin vivo
as follows: the inhibitor was dissolved in NS, and the inhibitor solution (or dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO] for control) was injected into the vitreous cavity 30 minutes before treatment with high IOP.After the aHIOP model was completed, the rats were sacrificed quickly, and their eyeballs were removed and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 24 hours. Then they were treated with 15% and 30% sucrose solution sequentially for dehydration. After dehydration, the eyeball was dissected, the cornea, lens and vitreous body were removed, and the retinal tissue was retained. The retina was embedded with OCT glue (Sakura Finetek, Tokyo, Japan) and frozen at –80°C for 24 hours. Frozen sections were cut to a thickness of 20 µm using a cryotome (Cryotome FSE, Thermo Electron Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA). The sections were stored at –20°C until use. All animal experiments were conducted independently at least five times.
Cell cultures
R28 cells (retinal precursor cells) were provided by Dr. Lei Shang (Jiang Xi Research Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China) as a gift. This R28 cell line has been tested by short tandem repeats (STR) analysis and it is not misidentified or contaminated according to current database and widely used in our previous studies (Rong et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2021). R28 cells were cultured in low glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; low glucose: 1000 mg/L glucose; Cat# MA0580, Meilunbio, Dalian, Liaoning, China) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Hyclone, Cat# SV30087GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, UT, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (PS; 10,000 U/mL penicillin, 10,000 µg/mL streptomycin in 0.85% NaCl; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, Cat# SV30010) at 37°C in a 5% COcell culture incubator (Thermo Scientific Forma Series 3111, Thermo Fisher Scientific). R28 cells were subcultured every 2 or 3 days. The R28 cells were used for related experiments after drug treatment.
OGD/R injury of R28 cells
The OGD/R model was used to simulate I/R injuryin vitro
(Hu et al., 2020b; Xie et al., 2020). When R28 cells were subcultured to the 3generation and had grown to about 80% density, the OGD/R model was performed on the cells using a protocol based on published literature (Wang et al., 2018b, 2020; Huang et al., 2021). When the R28 cells were cultured to a suitable state, the initial culture medium (low glucose DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% PS) was replaced with glucose-free medium (DMEM, no glucose, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 1966025) with FBS and PS. After the medium was changed, cell culture containers were placed in the OGD treatment device, which maintained a hypoxic condition (O< 1%). This device was made by our research team, and contained an airtight box, oxygen concentration sensor, and a hypoxic air supply pipeline (95% nitrogen and 5% CO) to replace the oxygen containing air. It was well-tested and applied in our previous studies (Chen et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2018, 2020; Huang et al., 2021). The R28 cells subjected to OGD treatment were cultured at 37°C for 2 hours. After OGD injury, the cells were returned to the initial culture condition (low glucose DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% PS at 37°C in a 5% COcell culture incubator) for 2 hours. The normal control group was maintained in the normal culture medium (low glucose DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% PS) in a culture incubator (Thermo Scientific Forma Series 3111, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37°C and 5% COfor the same length of time. All cell experiments were performed at least three times independently.Drug treatments
Z-VAD-FMK (Z-VAD; Cat# S7023, Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX, USA) was dissolved in DMSO at a final concentration of 50 µM. Disulfiram (DSF; Selleck Chemicals, Cat# S1680) was dissolved in DMSO at a final concentration of 0.3 µM. Necrostatin-1 (Nec-1; Cat# S8037, Selleck Chemicals) was dissolved in DMSO at a final concentration of 20 µM. R28 cells were pretreated with drugs (or DMSO for control) for 1 hour before OGD modeling (Wang et al., 2018, 2020; Huang et al., 2021). For treatment with a combination of these inhibitors in the OGD/R model, the final concentration of each inhibitor in combination was the same as that of a single inhibitor mentioned above. In the aHIOP model, the amounts of Z-VAD (10 mM), DSF (10 mM), and Nec-1 (20 mM) injected into the OHT eye were 3, 0.5 and 1.5 µL, respectively. The processing time was 30 minutes.
Propidium iodide staining
Propidium iodide (PI; MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA, Cat# P4170) staining combined with Nec-1 was used to indicate necroptosis. Nec-1 is a specific inhibitor of necroptosis that targets receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1), which is the key upstream kinase of necroptosis activation (Degterev et al., 2008). PI is a nuclear dye that fluoresces red when it binds to DNA. When the membrane integrity is damaged by cell necrosis, PI can enter the cell and bind to DNA, so it is usually used to detect necrotic cells (Nicoletti et al., 1991; Riccardi and Nicoletti, 2006). PI was dissolved in 0.01 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at a final concentration of 10 µg/mL (Wang et al., 2018, 2020; Huang et al., 2021). After OGD/R and drug treatment, R28 cells were gently washed three times with PBS for 5 minutes each, stained with PI dye, and placed in the cell culture incubator (Thermo Scientific Forma Series 3111, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at room temperature (25°C) for 20 minutes while being protected from light. After removal of PI dye, R28 cells were gently washed with PBS three times for 5 minutes each, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Solarbio, Beijing, China, Cat# P1110) at room temperature (25°C) for 20 minutes, and washed gently with PBS three times for 5 minutes each. In the rat aHIOP groups, 5 µL of PI (100 µg/mL) was injected through the anterior chamber angle into the intravitreal space of the OHT eye 30 minutes before the animals were killed. The R28 cells and sections stained with PI were subsequently stained using Hoechst 33258 (MilliporeSigma, Cat# 94403) in 0.01 M PBS at a final concentration of 0.5 µg/mL for 10 minutes at room temperature, and then the cells were washed with PBS three times for 5 minutes each.
The cells were covered with a mixture of glycerol and PBS at a ratio of 1:9 and observed under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) (Wang et al., 2018, 2020; Huang et al., 2021). Images were taken at six random positions for each sample. The percentage of PI-positive cells was analyzed by ImageJ v.1.4.3 software (NIH, Baltimore, MD, USA).
Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling
Ethidium Homodimer III staining
Ethidium Homodimer III (EthD-III; Biotium, Fremont, CA, USA, Cat# 40050) staining combined with DSF was used to indicate pyroptosis. DSF inhibits GSDMD expression and interferes with pore formation triggered by GSDMD in the cell membrane to prevent the release of interleukin and other inflammatory factors (Zhang et al., 2021a, b). This special function enables DSF to inhibit cell pyroptosis (Hu et al., 2020a). EthD-III is a fluorescent nucleic acid dye that cannot pass through normal cell membranes. It selectively stains dead cells with damaged cell membranes, and is a useful dye for pyroptosis (Pan et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019b). EthD-III was dissolved in 1 × PBS and the solution concentration was adjusted to 1 µg/mL. R28 cells were treated with EthD-III solution for 10 minutes at room temperature, followed by three PBS washes for 5 minutes each. Subsequently, they were soaked with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes, followed by three PBS washes for 5 minutes each. Then, 5 µL of EthD-III (100 µg/mL) was injected into the intravitreal space of the eye 30 minutes before the animals were killed. Cells and sections stained with EthD-III were stained using Hoechst 33258 (MilliporeSigma, Cat# 94403) (see Section “Propidium iodide staining”). The cells were observed under a fluorescence microscope. Images were taken at six random positions for each sample. The percentage of EthD-III-positive cells was analyzed by Image J software.
Western blot assay
R28 cells were lysed in ice-cold RIPA buffer (CWBIO, Beijing, China) with 1% protease inhibitors (CWBIO) and 1% phosphatase inhibitors (CWBIO). Protein concentrations were determined with the BCA protein assay kit (CWBIO). Protein samples were separated by 10% or 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Pall, New York, NY, USA, Cat# 66485). The membranes were incubated at room temperature for 2 hours in 5% nonfat dry milk, and then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. The reactions were followed by incubation with peroxidase-labeled secondary antibodies. Primary antibodies were: anti-BAX (1:1000, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA, Cat# 50599-2-Ig, RRID: AB_2061561), anti-BCL-2 (1:2000, Proteintech, Cat# 26593-1-AP, RRID: AB_2818996), anti-caspase 1 (1:500, Proteintech, Cat# 22915-1-AP, RRID: AB_2876874), anti-caspase 3 (1:500, Proteintech, Cat# 19677-1-AP, RRID: AB_10733244), anti-gasdermin-D (GSDMD; 1:1000, Proteintech, Cat# 20770-1-AP, RRID: AB_10696319), anti-interleukin-1β (IL-1β; 1:1000, Bioss, Beijing, China, Cat# bs-0812R, RRID: AB_10855142), anti-IL-18 (1:1000, Proteintech, Cat# 10663-1-AP, RRID: AB_2123636), anti-mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL; 1:1000, ABclonal, Cat# A13451, RRID: AB_2861686), anti-NODlike receptor protein 3 (NLRP3; 1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK, Cat# 263899, RRID: AB_2889890), anti-RIPK3 (1:1000, Novus, Shanghai, China, Cat# NBP1-77299, RRID: AB_11040928), and anti-β-Actin (1:4000, Affinity Biosciences, Changzhou, Guangdong Province, China, Cat# AF7018, RRID: AB_2839420). The secondary antibodies were peroxidase-conjugated affiniPure donkey anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000, Jackson Immuno Research, West Grove, PA, USA, Cat# 711-035-152, RRID: AB_10015282) and donkey anti-mouse IgG (H+L, 1:5000, Jackson Immuno Research, Cat# 715-035-150, RRID: AB_2340770). The membranes were developed with electrochemiluminescent reagents and the band intensities were quantitated with Image J software. The level of expression was normalized to the level of β-actin. All cell experiments were performed at least three times independently.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
The expression levels of IL-1β and IL-18 in R28 cell culture supernatant were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (rat IL-1β, F2923-A; rat IL-18, F3070-A; KX-Bio Co., Shanghai, China). Following OGD/R treatment, cell culture supernatants were collected and centrifuged at 3000 r/min for 20 minutes. Then IL-1β and IL-18 concentrations were determined according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Immunofluorescence staining
Frozen sections of rat retinal tissue were placed at room temperature for 30 minutes, washed three times with PBS for 5 minutes each, sealed with 1 × PBS containing 5% bovine serum albumin and 0.3% Triton X-100 for 2 hours, and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Primary antibodies were: anti-cleaved caspase 3 (1:50, Cell Signaling Technology, Oslo, Norway, Cat# 9664, RRID: AB_2070042), anti-GSDMD (1:50; Proteintech, Cat# 20770-1-AP, RRID: AB_10696319), anti-MLKL (1:50; ABclonal, Cat# A13451, RRID: AB_2861686), and anti-NeuN (1:2000, Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany, Cat# MAB377, RRID: AB_2298772). After three PBS washes for 5 minutes each, the sections were incubated with fluorescently labeled secondary antibody at room temperature for 2 hours in the dark. After three PBS washes for 5 minutes each, the sections were stained using Hoechst 33258 (Cat# 94403, MilliporeSigma) (see Section “Propidium iodide staining”). After three PBS washes for 5 minutes each, anti-fluorescence quenching agent was dropped on the sections, and the tissues were covered with glycerin and cover glass. Finally, images were captured using a fluorescence microscope and analyzed by ImageJ software. All animal experiments were performed at least five times independently.
Now when days had passed and they did not return, Tsarevitch Ivan besought17 his father to give him also his blessing, with leave to ride forth18 to search for the Fire Bird, but Tsar Vyslav denied him, saying: My dear son, the wolves will devour19 thee. Thou art still young and unused to far and difficult journeying. Enough that thy brothers have gone from me. I am already old in age, and walk under the eye of God; if He take away my life, and thou, too, art gone, who will remain to keep order in my Tsardom? Rebellion may arise and there will be no one to quell20 it, or an enemy may cross our borders and there will be no one to command our troops. Seek not, therefore, to leave me!
Statistical analysis
Data were summarized as the mean ± standard deviation of independent replicates. The significance of differences between two groups was determined by two-tailed Student’st
-test using GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA, www.graphpad.com).P
< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results
OGD/R induces morphological changes of PANoptosis-like cell death in R28 cells
We first investigated whether OGD/R simultaneously induces the morphological changes of PANoptosis-like cell death in R28 cells (Figure 1
). The OGD/R treatment and staining timeline were the same in each group. Cell staining results indicated that the OGD/R treatment significantly induced apoptosis (TUNEL staining;Figure 2A
andD
), pyroptosis (EthD-III staining;Figure 2B
andD
), and necroptosis (PI staining;Figure 2C
andD
). The RCD morphology of cells treated with OGD/R after pretreatment with inhibitors of apoptosis (Z-VAD;Figure 2A
andD
), pyroptosis (DSF;Figure 2B
andD
), and necroptosis (Nec-1;Figure 2C
andD
) was significantly reversed. These results indicated that PANoptosis-like cell death occurred in R28 cells following OGD/R injury, which is similar to those observed in PANoptosis in other models (Kuriakose and Kanneganti, 2019; Malireddi et al., 2019; Karki et al., 2021).OGD/R induces expression changes of key proteins in PANoptosis-like cell death in R28 cells
The above results indicated that PANoptosis-like cell death occurred at the morphological level, thus it was important to next determine the expression changes of hallmark proteins for apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis in R28 cells following OGD/R injury. As shown inFigure 3A
, western blot assay showed that OGD/R treatment caused a significant increase of cleaved caspase-3 compared with the control and caspase inhibitor (Z-VAD) groups. The results also showed that compared with the control and Z-VAD groups, OGD/R treatment significantly increased the expression of pro-apoptotic protein BAX and decreased the expression of anti-apoptotic protein BCL-2.Figure 1|Schematic of the experimental timeline of OGD/R and aHIOP modeling.In the OGD/R model (top panel), R28 cells were pretreated with inhibitors (or DMSO for control) for 1 hour before establishing the OGD model. Then, the initial culture medium was replaced with glucose-free medium. The cell culture containers were placed in the OGD treatment device, which maintained a hypoxic condition (O2 < 1%). OGD treatment lasted for 2 hours. After OGD treatment, the cells were returned to the initial culture condition for 2 hours. The normal control group was maintained in the normal culture condition for the same length of time. In the aHIOP model (bottom panel), inhibitors (or DMSO for control) were injected into the vitreous cavity 30 minutes before HIOP/sham surgery. To induce ocular hypertension, normal saline was injected into the anterior chamber to form artificial intraocular pressure (IOP). IOP was slowly increased to 110 mmHg and maintained for 60 minutes, then gradually returned to normal level and maintained for 48 hours before retinal tissue collection. In the sham group, a sterilized needle was inserted into the anterior chamber without elevating the IOP at the same time point. aHIOP: Acute high intraocular pressure; DMSO: dimethyl sulphoxide; OGD/R: oxygen-glucose deprivation/recovery.
Figure 2|OGD/R-induced R28 cells exhibit pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis.(A) Terminal-deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining for R28 cells. R28 cells were treated with OGD/R and Z-VAD. (B) Ethidium Homodimer III (EthD-III) staining for R28 cells. R28 cells were treated with OGD/R and DSF. (C) Propidium iodide (PI) staining for R28 cells. R28 cells were treated with OGD/R and Nec-1. Scale bars: 50 µm. (D) Percentage of TUNEL-, EthD-III-, PI-positive cells (mean ± SD, n = 3). **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, vs. Control; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, vs. OGD/R (Student’s t-test). All cell experiments were performed at least three times independently. DSF: Disulfiram; Nec-1: necrostatin-1; OGD/R: oxygen-glucose deprivation/recovery; Z-VAD: Z-VAD-FMK.
Western blot showed that OGD/R treatment increased expression of NLRP3 and cleaved caspase-1 (CASP1 p20) (Figure 3B
), key proteins in the pyroptosis pathway. Expression of cleaved GSDMD and GSDMD-N (p30), a driver of pyroptosis, were also upregulated by the OGD/R treatment. Elevated expression of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β (p17) and IL-18 (p22) were also observed in the OGD/R group. These expression changes were reversed by the specific GSDMD inhibitor DSF. Moreover, the ELISA assay indicated that expressions of mature IL-1β and IL-18 were significantly increased in the R28 cell culture supernatant after OGD/R treatment, and these increases were reversed by DSF inhibitor (Figure 3D
). The above results indicated caspase-1/NLRP3/GSDMD-mediated pyroptosis in R28 cells following OGD/R treatment. Increases in the protein levels of phosphorylated RIPK3 and phosphorylated MLKL are hallmarks of necroptosis (Vandenabeele et al., 2010; Pasparakis and Vandenabeele, 2015). As depicted inFigure 3C
, the OGD/R treatment remarkably upregulated the expressions of phosphorylated RIPK3 and phosphorylated MLKL, and inhibitors of necroptosis prevented this increase. Taken together, these results indicated that OGD/R treatment induced pyroptosis, apoptosis and necroptosis in R28 cells at the protein level at the same time point, and further suggest the existence of PANoptosis-like cell death in R28 cells.Figure 3|Treatment with OGD/R upregulates key proteins of pyroptosis, apoptosis and necroptosis in R28 cells.(A) Western blotting of caspase-3, BAX and Bcl-2 in R28 cells after treatment with OGD/R and Z-VAD inhibitor. (B) Western blotting of caspase-1, NLRP3, GSDMD, IL-18, IL-1β in R28 cells after treatment with OGD/R and DSF inhibitor. (C) Western blotting of phosphorylated RIPK3 and phosphorylated MLKL in R28 cells after treatment with OGD/R and Nec-1 inhibitor. Quantifications of protein expression are shown to the right of each western blot image. (D) ELISA of the expressions of mature IL-1β and IL-18 in the R28 cell culture supernatant after treatment with OGD/R and DSF inhibitor. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. Control; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, vs. OGD/R (Student’s t-test). All cell experiments were performed at least three times independently. BAX: Bcl-2-associated X protein; CASP: caspase; DSF: disulfiram; GSDMD: Gasdermin-D; IL: interleukin; MLKL: mixed lineage kinase domain-like; Nec-1: necrostatin-1; NLRP3: NACHT, LRR, and PYD domains-containing protein 3; OGD/R: oxygen-glucose deprivation/recovery; RIPK: receptor-interacting protein kinase; Z-VAD: Z-VAD-FMK.
Combination of three RCD inhibitors significantly protects R28 cells following OGD/R
The results above indicated that OGD/R treatment induced PANoptosis-like cell death in R28 cells at the same time point. Next, we investigated whether the cell loss following OGD/R treatment is mainly dependent on this kind of combined cell death. Thus, pretreatment with different combinations of inhibitors for apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis was used to assess the protective effects on cell loss against OGD/R treatment. As shown inFigure 4A
andB
, Z-VAD combined with either DSF or Nec-1 had a better protective effect than that of Z-VAD alone, as measured by TUNEL-positive cell death, following OGD/R treatment. There was no significant difference between the triple combination and the double combinations, and the TUNEL-positive cell death was largely reversed by the combined pretreatments. The combination of DSF with Z-VAD, or with both Z-VAD and Nec-1, had a better protective effect on EthD-III-positive cell death than DSF alone (Figure 5A
andB
). The triple combination of DSF, Z-VAD and Nec-1 had the largest protective effect on EthD-III-positive cell death compared with each of the double combinations. PI staining also indicated that the combination of Nec-1 with Z-VAD, or with both Z-VAD and DSF, had a larger protective effect than Nec-1 alone (Figure 6A
andB
). Moreover, the triple combination of Nec-1, Z-VAD and DSF had a larger protective effect on PI-positive cell death than the double combination of Nec-1 and DSF. Taken together, these results suggested that OGD/R-induced R28 cell death is mainly driven by PANoptosis-like cell death.Figure 4|Combination of RCD inhibitors decreases the OGD/R-induced TUNELpositive cells.(A) TUNEL staining for R28 cells treated with combinations of RCD inhibitors following OGD/R treatment. Scale bars: 50 µm. Red: TUNEL-positive cells. (B) Percentage of TUNELpositive cells (mean ± SD, n = 3). *P < 0.05, vs. OGD/R + Z-VAD (Student’s t-test). DSF: Disulfiram; n.s.: not significant; Nec-1: necrostatin-1; OGD/R: oxygen-glucose deprivation/recovery; RCD: regulated cell death; TUNEL: terminal-deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated nick end labeling; Z-VAD: Z-VAD-FMK.
An aHIOP model induces PANoptosis-like cell death
The above experiments indicated that OGD/R injury can induce PANoptosislike cell deathin vitro
. Next, we used a rat aHIOP model to investigate whether I/R injury can induce PANoptosis-like cell deathin vivo
(Figure 1
). As shown inFigure 7A
, aHIOP treatment induced apoptotic cell death of retinal neurons (indicated by TUNEL staining) in the ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner nuclear layer (INL), and outer nuclear layer (ONL). The increased TUNEL staining was significantly reduced by Z-VAD pretreatment. Increased caspase-3 expression was detected by immunofluorescence staining in retinal neurons, which further indicated the occurrence of apoptosis in retinal neurons following aHIOP treatment (Figure 8A
). Furthermore, the co-immunofluorescence staining of caspase-3 and NeuN indicated that caspase-3 was activated in the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) of aHIOP-treated retina.The existence of pyroptosis in retinal neurons was indicated by EthD-IIIpositive staining in GCL and INL of aHIOP-treated retina (Figure 7B
). EthDIII-positive staining in the retina was significantly reduced by pretreatment of specific pyroptosis inhibitor DSF. Moreover, as shown inFigure 8B
, aHIOP treatment significantly increased GSDMD expression (indicated by immunofluorescence staining) in the GCL and INL, which was consistent with the EthD-III staining. Also, the co-immunofluorescence staining of GSDMD and NeuN indicated the activation of GSDMD in RGCs. Thus, these results indicated that aHIOP treatment induced pyroptosis in retinal neuronsin vivo
.Similarly, aHIOP treatment increased PI staining, suggesting that aHIOP treatment induced necroptotic cell death, in the GCL, INL, and ONL of the retina, and Nec-1 pretreatment significantly reduced the PI-positive staining (Figure 7C
). Furthermore, after aHIOP treatment, immunofluorescence staining showed increased expression of MLKL, a key protein of necroptosis execution, indicating that aHIOP treatment induced retinal cell necroptosis (Figure 8C
). The co-immunofluorescence staining of MLKL and NeuN indicated the activation of MLKL in RGCs of aHIOP-treated retina. Taken together, the results demonstrated that PANoptosis-like cell death occurredin vivo
in retinal neurons following aHIOP injury.Figure 5|Combination of RCD inhibitors decreases the OGD/R-induced EthD-IIIpositive cells.(A) EthD-III staining for R28 cells treated with combinations of RCD inhibitors following OGD/R treatment. Red: EthD-III-positive cells. Scale bars: 50 µm. (B) Percentage of EthDIII-positive cells (mean ± SD, n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, vs. OGD/R + Z-VAD + DSF + Nec-1; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, vs. OGD/R + DSF (Student’s t-test). DSF: Disulfiram; EthDIII: Ethidium Homodimer III; Nec-1: necrostatin-1; OGD/R: oxygen-glucose deprivation/recovery; RCD: regulated cell death; Z-VAD: Z-VAD-FMK.
Figure 6|Combination of RCD inhibitors decreases the OGD/R-induced PI-positive cells.(A) PI staining for R28 cells treated with OGD/R and Z-VAD, DSF, and Nec-1. Red: PIpositive cells. Scale bars: 50 µm. (B) Percentage of PI-positive cells (mean ± SD, n = 3). **P < 0.01, vs. OGD/R + Z-VAD + DSF + Nec-1; ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001 vs. OGD/R+Nec-1 (Student’s t-test). All cell experiments were performed at least three times independently. DSF: Disulfiram; n.s.: not significant; Nec-1: necrostatin-1; OGD/R: oxygen-glucose deprivation/recovery; PI: propidium iodide; RCD: regulated cell death; Z-VAD: Z-VAD-FMK.
Figure 7|aHIOP induces pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis in vivo in rat retina.(A) TUNEL staining for rat retinal sections. The rats were treated with aHIOP and Z-VAD. (B) EthD-III staining for rat retinal sections. The rats were treated with aHIOP and DSF. (C) PI staining for rat retinal sections. The sections were treated with aHIOP and Nec-1. Scale bars: 50 µm. Percentage of TUNEL-, EthD-III-, and PI-positive cells shown to the right of images (mean ± SD, n = 5 rats per group). ***P < 0.001, vs. Sham; ##P < 0.01, vs. aHIOP (Student’s t-test). aHIOP: Acute high intraocular pressure; DSF: disulfiram; GCL: ganglion cell layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; Nec-1: necrostatin-1; ONL: outer nuclear layer; Z-VAD: Z-VAD-FMK.
Figure 8| aHIOP induces high expression of pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosisrelated proteins in rat retina.Immunofluorescence staining of CASP3 (A), GSDMD (B) and MLKL (C) of rat retinal tissue sections. NeuN staining was used to indicate ganglion cells in the retina. Scale bars: 50 µm. Quantification of pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis-related protein expressions shown on the right of images (mean ± SD, n = 5 rats per group). Relative fold intensity of immunofluorescence staining was normalized relative to the intensity of the sham group. **P < 0.001, vs. Sham; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, vs. OGD/R (Student’s t-test). aHIOP: Acute high intraocular pressure; CASP: caspase; Co-IF: co-immunofluorescence; DSF: disulfiram; GCL: ganglion cell layer; GSDMD: gasdermin-D; INL: inner nuclear layer; Nec-1: necrostatin-1; MLKL: mixed lineage kinase domain-like; ONL: outer nuclear layer; Z-VAD: Z-VAD-FMK.
Recent studies have indicated extensive crosstalk between RCD pathways, and PANoptosis is a newly defined phenomenon in which pyroptosis, apoptosis and necroptosis simultaneously occur in infectious disease, pathogen-induced immune response or inflammation (Malireddi et al., 2019). Furthermore, it has been shown that PANoptosis is regulated by the PANoptosome complex, which is composed of caspase-1, caspase-8, NLRP3, and other components (Christgen et al., 2020; Samir et al., 2020; Briard et al., 2021). Recent studies have indicated that the PANoptosome can be regulated by z-DNA binding protein 1 and TGF-β-activated kinase 1 to regulate the outcome of pyroptosis, apoptosis and necroptosis (Christgen et al., 2020; Samir et al., 2020). Findings from these studies suggested that identification and characterization of PANoptosis were vital to inform the development of targeted inhibitors for microbial infections and regulators of inflammatory cell death for therapeutic modulation of inflammation and the immune response. However, the existence of PANoptosis in noninfectious injuries and the nervous system remains unknown. Previous studies have established a process to investigate PANoptosis in disease or injury: the first level is to confirm the existence of PANoptosis-like cell death (simultaneous occurrence of pyroptosis, apoptosis and necroptosis). The second level is to study the existence of the PANoptosome that regulates the three RCDs simultaneously. And the third level is to find regulators of the PANoptosome. The main purpose of this study was to investigate whether PANoptosis-like cell death exists in nervous system I/R injury, and characterize the manifestation of PANoptosis-like cell death.
To investigate whether PANoptosis-like cell death plays a role in retinal I/R injury, R28 cells were selected forin vitro
experimental study, and an OGD/R model was used to simulate I/R injuryin vitro
. Additionally, we selected Sprague Dawley rats forin vivo
experiments, and used an aHIOP model to simulatein vivo
I/R injury of retinal neurons. R28 cells are immortal retinal progenitor cells that are widely used to study retinal diseases and injuries (Huang et al., 2021). It is a classic cell line that simulates retinal neurons (Mathew et al., 2019, 2021). OGD/R and aHIOP models simulate I/R injury of retinal neurons (Osborne et al., 1995; Rosenbaum et al., 1998, 2001; Dvoriantchikova et al., 2010, 2014). They are widely used and generally accepted models at present (Rosenbaum et al., 1998, 2001; Dvoriantchikova et al., 2010).Our experimental data showed that under the same model conditions and the same treatment time, pyroptosis, apoptosis and necroptosis occurred simultaneously after retinal I/R injury induced by OGD/R in R28 cells and aHIOP in rat retina. These data support the first level of the definition of PANoptosis, that is, PANoptosis-like cell death exists in retinal neuronal I/R injury. Previous studies on PANoptosis suggest that immune response and inflammatory response are closely related to the occurrence of PANoptosis (Kuriakose and Kanneganti, 2019; Banoth et al., 2020; Malireddi et al., 2020; Place et al., 2021). Similarly, studies on RCD of retinal neurons and other neurons have reported that the occurrence of pyroptosis is closely related to inflammatory factors (Homme et al., 2018; Zheng et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020), and that key molecules of apoptosis can be regulated by inflammatory reactions (Toda and Nakanishi-Toda, 2007; Zheng et al., 2007; Cuenca et al., 2014). Necroptosis can also be initiated by inflammatory factors (Duprez et al., 2011; Kaczmarek et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2019a; Lin et al., 2020). The present study also showed that the protective effects of a combination of two inhibitors were not always better than those of a single inhibitor, indicating a potential crosstalk between those RCDs. Moreover, our results showed that pretreatment with three RCD inhibitors not only inhibited the kinase activity of death-signaling proteins to reduce the cell loss caused by I/R injury, but also significantly decreased the expression of those proteins in R28 cell clusters and rat retinal tissues. Without any intervention, expression of these proteins would increase in a signaling cascade affected by the release of inflammatory factors from surrounding cell death. Taken together, these findings suggest that the phenotypes and pathological mechanisms of cell death in retinal I/R injury have morphological features and pathological mechanisms in common with PANoptosis in infectious diseases.
This study preliminarily indicated the existence of PANoptosis-like cell death in I/R injury of retinal neurons, as observed by morphological features, protein levels, and the induction of important members of the PANoptosome (caspase-1, NLRP3, and RIPK3) under experimental conditions. Our previous literature mining research suggested that PANoptosis is likely to exist in nervous system diseases or injuries other than infectious diseases (Yan et al., 2022). The present study is only a beginning of PANoptosis-related research in retinal neurons, and does not address the wide range of the nervous system. Retinal precursor cells R28 do not fully represent brain tissue and the whole nervous system, although the retina is an important part of the central nervous system. Our results showed that the combination of all three inhibitors did not fully eliminate the cell loss induced by I/R injury, which suggests the existence of other signaling cascades or other types of RCD that could be involved in PANoptosis in this model. This study mainly focused on the first level study of PANoptosis to characterize the existence of PANoptosis-like cell death. In future experimental studies, it will be necessary to characterize the PANoptosome in I/R injury of retinal neurons, and to look for key molecules that regulate PANoptosis.
Author contributions:
Study conceptualization: KX and QZ; study design: KX, QZ, and WTY; study implementation: WTY and WJZ; data collection: WTY, WJZ, XMH, XXB, and WYN; manuscript writing: WTY and QZ; manuscript review and editing: KX, QZ, WTY, HW, and WJZ; study supervision: KX and QZ. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest:
The authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest.
Editor note: KX is an editorial board member of Neural Regeneration Research. He was blinded from reviewing or making decisions on the manuscript. The article was subject to the journal’s standard procedures, with peer review handled independently of this Editorial Board member and their research groups.
Open access statement:
This is an open access journal, and
articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.