穆玉娟 马 腾
磁共振同反相位序列对肾癌诊断的影响
穆玉娟 马 腾
目的探讨磁共振(MR)同反相位序列对肾癌诊断的影响。方法采用回顾性研究方法,选择140例肾肿瘤患者作为研究对象,病理检查确诊为肾癌40例(恶性组)和肾良性肿瘤100例(良性组),都进行MR同反相位序列诊断与定量鉴别分析。结果所有患者的MR图像均显示清晰,无明显磁敏感伪影及图像变形。恶性组中有39例(97.5%)同相位序列表现为高信号,36例(90.0%)反相位序列表现为高信号。良性组中有78例(78.0%)同相位序列表现为高信号,72例(72.0%)反相位序列表现为高信号,两两对比都有统计学意义(P<0.05)。良性组患者的ADC 值为(1.21±0.21)×10-3mm2/s,恶性组患者的ADC 值为(1.69±0.30)×10-3mm2/s,两两对比有明显差异(P<0.05)。以1.355×10-3mm2/s为ADC阈值,MR同反相位序列诊断肾癌的敏感性和特异性分别为85.0%和92.1%。结论MR 同反相位序列在肾癌诊断中的应用能提供临床定量诊断与鉴别依据,有很好的应用价值。
磁共振;同反相位序列;肾癌;高信号;诊断价值
肾癌是泌尿科常见的恶性肿瘤,其中肾细胞癌占肾癌的90%以上。当前由于各种因素的影响,肾癌在我国的发病率有逐渐上升的趋势,且男性发病率均是女性的2~3倍[1]。磁共振(magnetic resonance,MR)是对深部各种病变进行诊断评估及描述的最佳影像手段之一,不过常规MR平扫及增强扫描在鉴别诊断上常有一定限度[2]。比如有些肾癌病变在病理上有较为特征性的改变,如肾癌结节等在镜下常有一定的脂肪变性[3]。MR T1WI同反相位序列由于能检测病变内少量的脂肪成分,从而得到了广泛的应用[4]。特别是肾脏组织含水量大,受呼吸运动影响较小,位置深在,血供丰富,使其成为反相位序列在脏器应用较为理想的器官[5-6]。本研究具体探讨了MR同反相位序列对肾癌诊断的影响,现报告如下。
采用回顾性研究方法,选择2014年3月到2016年12月在我院诊治的肾肿瘤患者140例作为研究对象。纳入标准:MR诊断前均未经任何治疗;单发病灶;临床主要症状为血尿、肾绞痛等;都有完整的病理资料及随访资料;研究得到医院伦理委员会的批准。排除标准:MR图像明显变形失真者。140例患者中男性68例,女性72例;年龄27~78岁,平均年龄(56.22±3.18)岁;肿瘤直径0.6~3.0 cm,平均为(1.45±0.32)cm;平均体重指数为(23.55±0.51)kg/m2。病理确诊为肾癌40例(恶性组),其中透明细胞肾癌21例,乳头状肾癌11例,嫌色细胞肾癌8例;临床分级:Ⅰ级30 例,Ⅱ 级6 例,Ⅲ 级3例,Ⅳ级1例。肾良性肿瘤100例(良性组),其中炎性病变56例,血管瘤30例,囊肿14例。
采用西门子Avanto 1.5T磁共振扫描仪,所有患者取仰卧位,头先进,扫描时尽量于呼气末屏气并尽量保持各序列基线水平一致,扫描范围包括全部肾脏。常规均行自旋回波(SE)T1加权(TR 300 ms,TE 16 ms)及脂肪抑制T2WI(TR 3 000~5 000 ms)成像,间隔2 mm,层厚5 mm,矩阵256×256,视野380 mm×380 mm。同时进行同相位与反相位梯度回波T1WI扫描扫描,视野、层厚、间隔、均与常规扫描相同,TR175 ms,TE 4.5 ms(2.2 ms),扫描16层,翻转角85°,单次屏气采集,成像时间15 s。
扫描原始图像传入T磁共振扫描仪的后处理工作站,调整域值范围以包含整个肾脏,由工作站自动生成肾脏表观扩散系数(ADC)伪彩图。其中病灶部位的位置需根据肿瘤的MRI 图像进行确定。分别测量并记录肾实质的ADC值(ADC肾)和病灶的ADC 值(ADC瘤),测定3次取平均值。
所有患者的MR图像均显示清晰,无明显磁敏感伪影及图像变形。在恶性组患者中,39例(97.5%)同相位序列表现为高信号,36例(90.0%)反相位序列表现为高信号。在良性组患者中,78例(78.0%)同相位序列表现为高信号,72例(72.0%)反相位序列表现为高信号,两两对比,差异都有统计学意义(χ2=7.913、5.250,P均<0.05)。
140例患者肾实质的ADC值为(2.21±0.32)×10-3mm2/s,肾脏实性肿瘤的ADC值为(1.54±0.37)×10-3mm2/s。良性组患者的ADC 值为(1.21±0.21)×10-3mm2/s,恶性组患者的ADC 值为(1.69±0.30)×10-3mm2/s,两两对比有明显差异(t=9.253,P<0.05)。
以恶性组与良性组实性肿瘤的ADC值绘制ROC曲线,曲线下面积为0.782,以1.355×10-3mm2/s为阈值,MR同反相位序列诊断肾癌的敏感性和特异性分别为85.0%和92.1%。
肾癌是指来源于肾实质泌尿小管上皮组织的肾脏肿瘤,常见于50~60岁成人,多为单发[7],临床主要表现为血尿、腰部疼痛等。目前研究发现肾癌的病因与吸烟、高血压、肥胖等多种因素有关[8]。肾癌本身无包膜,压迫周围肾实质及纤维组织形成假包膜,多数伴坏死、囊变、出血、纤维化;病理见典型的透明细胞,胞浆丰富含胆固醇物质、磷脂体、中性脂肪等[9]。
近年通过影像学检查发现的肾癌明显增多,MR对肾癌具有较高的组织分辨率,在显示病灶内部的组织特性等方面较敏感[10]。本研究显示所有患者的MR图像均显示清晰,无明显磁敏感伪影及图像变形。在MR梯度回波序列中,来自水和脂肪的氢质子磁矢量在不同的回波时间表现为相位方向一致(同相位)或相反(反相位)。其中1.5T MR的同、反相位图像的理想TE值大约应是4.5 ms和2.2 ms,脂肪与水含量相当的组织在反相位图像上信号强度降低,在同相位图像上信号强度增加[11]。本研究显示恶性组中有97.5%同相位序列表现为高信号,90.0%反相位序列表现为高信号。良性组中有78.0%同相位序列表现为高信号,72.0%反相位序列表现为高信号。两两对比都有统计学意义(P<0.05),主要在于混杂有水和脂肪成分的病变在同相位与反相位图像上的信号强度会发生变化。根据同相位与反相位图像上病变信号强度的变化能判断病灶内是否含有脂肪成分,从而反映病灶的良恶性情况[12]。
肾脏是人体内较为特殊的实质脏器,有过滤血液形成尿液的功能,血运较为丰富,故肾脏的ADC值较腹腔内其他实质脏器明显增高[13]。在同反相位序列中,DWI的应用能够探测或显示水分子的随机运动及水分子运动受限状态的序列,其中DWI ADC值的高低主要反映组织结构、细胞内外水分子的分布、细胞密度和细胞核浆比和细胞外间隙的差异。本研究显示良性组患者的ADC 值为(1.21±0.21)×10-3mm2/s,恶性组患者的ADC 值为(1.69±0.30)×10-3mm2/s,两两对比有明显差异(P<0.05)。主要在于MR有较高的软组织分辨率,同反相位序列还可以提供肿瘤血液动力学方面的信息,实质期病灶实质部分明显强化,病灶皮髓期有较明显强化。有研究表明MR鉴别肾肿瘤的良恶性的敏感度与特异性比较好,其中ROI的设置对ADC 值的测量结果也有较大的影响[14]。本研究采取了单个ROI代表肾脏实质,选择的位置为皮髓质交界处,主要在于皮髓质交界处受血流灌注的影响相对较少。结果显示以1.355×10-3mm2/s为阈值,MR同反相位序列诊断肾癌的敏感性和特异性分别为85.0%和92.1%。主要为同反相位序列可以在肾脏灌注的不同期相评价肿块的血管化程度,从而鉴别诊断效果比较好。
总之,MR 同反相位序列在肾癌诊断中的应用能提供临床定量诊断与鉴别依据,有很好的应用价值。
[1] Ding Y,Zeng M,Rao S,et al.Comparison of biexponential and monoexponential model of diffusion-weighted imaging for distinguishing between common renal cell carcinoma and fat poor angiomyolipoma〔J〕.Korean J Radiol,2016,17(6):853-863.
[2] Lin Y,Liang P,Yu XL,et al.Percutaneous microwave ablation of renal cell carcinoma is safe in patients with renal dysfunction〔J〕.Int J Hyperthermia,2016,2(15):1-6.
[3] Park JJ,Kim CK.Small (< 4 cm) Renal tumors with predominantly low signal intensity on T2-weighted images: differentiation of minimal-fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma〔J〕.AJR Am J Roentgenol,2016,11(8):1-7.
[4] Galmiche C,Bernhard JC,Yacoub M,et al.Is multiparametric MRI useful for differentiating oncocytomas from chromophobe renal cell carcinomas?〔J〕.AJR Am J Roentgenol,2017,208(2):343-350.
[5] Yamamoto A,Tamada T,Ito K,et al.Differentiation of subtypes of renal cell carcinoma: dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging versus diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging〔J〕.Clin Imaging,2016,7(41):53-58.
[6] Lis E,Saha A,Peck KK,et al.Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of osseous spine metastasis before and 1 hour after high-dose image-guided radiation therapy〔J〕.Neurosurg Focus,2017,42(1):9-12.
[7] Raoul JL,Adhoute X,Gilabert M,et al.How to assess the efficacy or failure of targeted therapy: Deciding when to stop sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma〔J〕.World J Hepatol,2016,8(35):1541-1546.
[8] Wendel C,Campitiello M,Plastino F,et al.Pituitary metastasis from renal cell carcinoma: description of a case report〔J〕.Am J Case Rep,2017,3(18):7-11.
[9] Feng Q,Ma Z,Zhang S,et al.Usefulness of diffusion tensor imaging for the differentiation between low-fat angiomyolipoma and clear cell carcinoma of the kidney〔J〕.Springerplus,2016,5:12.
[10] Fu W,Huang G,Moloo Z,et al.Multimodality imaging cha-racteristics of the common renal cell carcinoma subtypes: an analysis of 544 pathologically proven tumors〔J〕.J Clin Imaging Sci,2016,6:50.
[11] Sheikhbahaei S,Jones CS,Porter KK,et al.Defining the a-dded value of 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT to conventional cross-sectional imaging in the characterization of enhancing solid renal masses〔J〕.Clin Nucl Med,2017,42(4):e188-e193.
[12] Mastoraki A,Mastoraki S,Tsikala-Vafea M,et al.Prognostic benefit of surgical management of renal cell carcinoma invading the inferior vena cava〔J〕.Indian J Surg Oncol,2017,8(1):14-18.
[13] Young JR,Coy H,Kim HJ,et al.Performance of relative enhancement on multiphasic MRI for the differentiation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from papillary and chromophobe RCC subtypes and oncocytoma〔J〕.AJR Am J Roentgenol,2017,208(4):812-819.
[14] Höhne J,Hohenberger C,Proescholdt M,et al.Fluorescein sodium-guided resection of cerebral metastases-an update〔J〕.Acta Neurochir(Wien),2017,159(2):363-367.
TheEffectofMRIn-phaseandOpposed-phaseSequenceintheDiagnosisofRenalCellCarcinoma
MUYujuan,MATeng.
AffiliatedHaianHospitalofNantongUniversity,Nantong,226600
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of magnetic resonance(MR) in-phase and opposed-phase sequence in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma.Methods140 patients with renal tumors were selected as the research object,40 patients were renal cell carcinoma (malignant group) and 100 patients were benign renal tumors (benign group).All patients were analyzed with MR in-phase and opposed-phase sequence and quantitative differential diagnosis.ResultsThe MR images of all patients were showed clear and there were no significant magnetic susceptibility artifacts and image distortion.In the malignant group,there were 39 patients(97.5%)were showed high signal in the in-phase sequence,and there were 36 patients (90.0%) were showed high signal in the opposed-phase sequence.In the benign group,78(78.0%)showed high signal in the same phase sequence,72 cases (72.0%) showed high signal sequence.The 2 groups had statistically significantly difference(P<0.05).The ADC value of the benign group was (1.21±0.21)×10-3mm2/s,and the ADC value of the malignant group was(1.69±0.30)×10-3mm2/s,and there was significant difference compared between the 2 groups(P<0.05).The sensitivity and specificity of MR in-phase and opposed-phase sequence in the diagnosis of renal carcinoma were 85.0% and 92.1%,respectively,with a threshold of 1.355×10-3mm2/s.ConclusionThe application of MR in-phase and opposed-phase sequence in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma can provide a basis for clinical diagnosis and identification,and has a good application value.
Magnetic resonance;In-phase and opposed-phase sequence;Renal cell carcinoma;High signal;Diagnostic value
(ThePracticalJournalofCancer,2017,32:2006~2008)
226600 江苏省南通大学附属海安医院(穆玉娟);226006 江苏省南通市妇幼保健院(马 腾)
10.3969/j.issn.1001-5930.2017.12.028
R737.11
A
1001-5930(2017)12-2006-03
2017-03-09
2017-09-04)
(编辑:甘艳)