Experimental assessment of regenerative properties of platelet rich plasma on the human skin - a review

Marco Mario Tresoldi, Angela Faga, Giovanni Nicoletti1,,4

1Unit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Clinical Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia 27100, Italy.

2Department of Surgery, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia 27100, Italy.

3Department of Clinical Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences and Department of Public Health and Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Advanced Technologies for Regenerative Medicine and Inductive Surgery Research Center, University of Pavia, Pavia 27100, Italy.

4Plastic Surgery Unit, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale di Pavia, Pavia 27100, Italy.

Abstract Several studies demonstrated the favorable effects of platelet rich plasma (PRP) on the skin and promoted its wide use in clinical practice.The growth factors stored in platelet alfa-granules allow for the tissue regeneration and the main fields of application of PRP in current clinical practice are the cartilage and musculoskeletal defects, osteoarthritis and other bone disorders, chronic and difficult to heal wounds, and aesthetic procedures.The relevant number of different PRP preparation protocols may explain the inconsistency of the different clinical outcomes reported in the literature.Despite the technological advances in PRP preparation, the objective assessment of the clinical efficacy of PRP from the literature reports still is difficult due to the low homogeneity of the samples in terms of both inclusion criteria and size.Therefore, it might be useful to establish standardized and reproducible experimental models to confirm and objectively measure the effectiveness of the available clinical results.Many experimental investigations have been carried out to objectively assess the effectiveness of PRP and platelet gel on several tissues.As far as the skin is concerned, the studies carried out to date are limited to fibroblasts in in-vitro culture models or to collagen, vascular supply, epithelium, and hair follicle in in-vivo models.The skin, however, is a very complex organ, where different cell lines coexist and feature complex mutual interaction.A model that combines the advantages of both in-vitro and in-vivocultures is the ex-vivomodel.The demonstration of the platelet derived growth factors effects through the ex-vivo human full-thickness skin culture model is a keystone to support the evidence of the PRP effectiveness, as it represents an objective, fast, reproducible, and ethical investigational method.

Keywords: Platelet rich plasma, PRP, ex-vivo, regeneration, culture techniques, skin

INTRODUCTION

Several studies demonstrated the favorable action of platelet rich plasma (PRP) on human tissues and promoted its wide use in clinical practice[1].The growth factors stored in platelet alfa-granules allow for the tissue regeneration and the main fields of application of PRP in current clinical practice are the wound healing process, cartilage and musculoskeletal defects, osteoarthritis and other bone disorders, chronic and difficult to heal wounds, and aesthetic procedures in an increasing number of medical specialties[2-11].Nevertheless, the reported outcomes are still inconsistent.

The properties of PRP may be affected by the patients’ age, gender, body mass index, diet, comorbidities, healing ability, and lifestyle[12,13].

The variables affecting the clinical results may be related also to the different modalities of PRP production starting from the whole human blood, the number of spin cycles related to the g-force and time in the centrifugation process, the platelet amount and concentration and the type of growth factor obtained[14,15].

Currently, there are more than 40 kits on the market to produce platelet-rich substance from a whole blood sample.The kits differ from each other in the number and capacity of the tubes used for processing, the “opened” or “closed” system to transfer the blood into the tubes and obtain the suspension, the blood separation system, and the number of steps required to obtain the PRP[16].

Such a large number of preparation methods may explain the inconsistency of the results reported by different authors[17].Among these kits, the most reliable ones are closed systems, which limit operator errors and reduce the risk of microbial contamination, avoiding blood transfers via syringes between the preparation steps[18,19].

According to the closed modality, the PRP samples feature a fixed concentration of specific biomolecules.Despite these technological advances in PRP preparation, the objective assessment of the clinical efficacy of PRP from the literature reports still is difficult due to the low homogeneity of the samples in terms of both inclusion criteria (e.g., age, pathologies, drug therapy, and severity of the defect to be treated), and depending on the field of application such as dermatology, plastic surgery, or orthopedics; goals can vary from improvement of skin quality to regeneration of hair loss to cartilage or bone regeneration.Therefore, it may be useful to establish standardized and reproducible experimental models to confirm and objectively measure the effectiveness of the currently available clinical results.

EXPERIMENTAL MODELS

The above-mentioned aim still is difficult to achieve due to the extreme variability and different limits of the experimental models, bothin-vitroandin-vivo.Many experimental investigations have been carried out to objectively assess the effectiveness of PRP and platelet gel on muscle, bone, cartilage, and endometrium[20-24].As far as the skin is concerned, the studies carried out to date are limited to fibroblasts inin-vitroculture models or to collagen, vascular supply, epithelium and hair follicle inin-vivomodels[25].

The skin, however, is very complex an organ, where different cell lines coexist and feature very complex mutual interaction[26].

Different experimental models with skin derived cells and/or structures are reported for both pharmacological and dermatological investigations, but most of them lack a fundamental feature, the ability to reproduce results on physiological skin in thein-vivoenvironment[27,28].

In-vitromodels are very popular as they are cheap and easy to use, and they usually include one or more skin cell types.The latter setting is termed co-culture and such a model allows for the observation of the mutual cell interactions.Usually, skin co-cultures may include keratinocytes and fibroblasts, keratinocytes and melanocytes, or keratinocytes and neurons.However, these models fail to reproduce thein-vivothreedimensional tissue morphology and physiology[29-31].

In-vivomodels are animal or human.The animalin-vivomodel allows studies and observations of pharmacological molecules and compounds directly on the living animal or after sacrificing it.Thanks to this model many data regarding regeneration, re-epithelialization, neo-angiogenesis, and innervation have been obtained[32].

However, both ethical and high costs issues significantly limit this model.

Moreover, the regenerative potential in the animals is significantly different from that of humans[33].

Therefore, it is a common trend in the scientific world to search for alternative approaches to experimenting in living animals.

The humanin-vivomodel is also used to test pharmacological molecules and compounds especially in patients suffering from dermatological diseases, whilst cosmetics can be tested on healthy volunteers.This is supposed to be the ideal model, although it is rarely used due to high costs and relevant ethical inquiries[28].

For the previously reported reasons and for the complexity of biochemical and biophysical processes involved in tissue regeneration, computational models were developed to understand cell growth and to device new scaffolds and tissue replacements.Two computational models have been developed so far: thein-silicoandin-virtuomodels[27,34].

Thein-silicomodel seems very promising both alone and in combination with other models[27].

Given the high complexity of the biochemical and biophysical processes involved in wound healing, the simulation offered by thein-silicomodel represents a powerful tool in understanding the behaviour of distinct cell types, growth factors, and the extracellular matrix within the human skin structure.

However, this model does not yet reproduce the physical features of the whole human skin[35,36].Thein-virtuomodel is based upon powerful software gathering all known data about cellular interactions, gene expression, and vitality, but to date such a model is still lacking enough data to be considered a valid alternative to thein-vivomodels[34].

A model that combines the advantages of bothin-vitroandin-vivocultures is theex-vivomodel.It is also called an organotypic model because it maintains the skin’s three-dimensional structure and best reproduces the tissue’s physiology.In this culture model, the skin can be both laboratory-engineered and native after harvest from living individuals.

The tissue-engineered skin - also known as reconstructed skin or reconstituted skin - is composed of two separate components, the epidermis and dermis.The epidermis is made by keratinocytes obtained from a skin explant and cultured on a support - for example, collagen - with the appropriatemediumallowing for the appropriate chemical-physical environment[37].During this period, keratinocytes progressively colonise the support and create a multi-layered, three-dimensional epithelial tissue.The dermis, instead, is made of different extra-cellular matrix equivalents which can be both natural and synthetic[37].The first reported tissue-engineered skin model included only two cell types, keratinocytes and fibroblasts derived from native skin explants[37].Subsequently, other cell types, such as melanocytes, endothelial cells, Langerhans cells, nerve cells, and adipocytes, enriched these models[37].

Theex-vivonative human skin obtained through surgical resection in skin-reducing procedures in healthy individuals is an effective experimental model to investigate the effects of topically applied products[38].The explanted skin can be used both as a whole or as a single layer after separating the epidermis from the dermis.The wholeex-vivoskin model keeps all skin cell types - keratinocytes, fibroblasts, melanocytes, Langerhans cells, endothelial cells, and Merkel cells - and it is only lacking in vascularisation and innervation[28].

As this experimental model maintains the structure of the native human skin, including the complete cell population and the dermal matrix components (i.e., collagen, elastin, glycosaminoglycans,etc.); it most closely approximates the effects of substances onin-vivohuman skin[28,38].

It may allow for the evaluation of the effects of topical products on human skin, either in the cosmetic or in the pharmaceutical context[28].

This model might also contribute to further disclose the fine mechanisms of skin regeneration.

An originalex-vivoPRP enriched human skin experimental model was recently devised by Nicolettiet al.[39].In this model, human skin samples were derived from surgical specimens harvested during breast reduction procedures.Prior to culture, the samples were wounded in their central portion in order to create a standard skin lesion.The tissue cultures were carried out under three different conditions:

- Enriched Dubecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) with saline solution in the central wound (control);

- Enriched DMEM with the same medium in the central wound;

- Enriched DMEM plus 2.5% autologous PRP, with the same PRP added medium in the central wound.Morphological analysis was carried out at 0 h (T0) and on days 1, 3, 5, and 10 (T1-T3-T5-T10) using hematoxylin and eosin, Masson’s trichrome staining, Weigert staining, and Ki-67 staining to identify the skin morphological and functional features in the different experimental conditions.

Therefore, the step by step histological and immunohistochemical regenerative effects of PRP on human skin wound repair and regeneration process was observed in detail over a period of 10 days.The overall vitality of the cultured skin samples was enhanced by the addition of PRP, as demonstrated by the macroscopic persistence of a lively pink color, up to, and even until 10 days, while the samples, cultured in the other conditions displayed a shift toward a yellow cadaveric color well before 5 days.A favorable modulation of the epithelial cells and fibroblasts proliferation was demonstrated by a regular reepithelialization of the experimental wound.A relevant anti-inflammatory action was demonstrated by the inhibition of lymph-plasma-cells infiltration[39].

PRP also allowed for an inhibitory effect on both the collagen and elastic fibers’ de-structuration and a favorable modulation of the re-organization of these fibers; in fact, the samples cultured with the PRP added medium displayed a regular and compact dermal pattern of prevalent thin collagen fibers in a shorter time compared to the other experimental conditions.

This original experimentalex-vivoPRP enriched skin culture model allowed for the step-by-step objective demonstration of the effects of platelet derived growth factors on the wound healing process.For the first time it was possible to observe and directly describe the stimulating action of platelet derived growth factors on the proliferation of keratinocytes, proliferation of fibroblasts, and synthesis of collagen, as well as the anti-inflammatory effects.This kind of model can explain in detail the main contribution of PRP in the field of human skin regeneration and it is possible to apply theex-vivomodel to many other tissues to observe and measure the efficacy of PRP in achieving the proposed objectives.

CONCLUSIONS

The demonstration of the platelet derived growth factors effects through theex-vivohuman full-thickness skin culture model is a keystone to support the evidence of PRP’s effectiveness, as it represents an objective, fast, reproducible, and ethical investigation method.Similarly, the use of PRP on other types of human tissues with theex-vivomodel can demonstrate its property in tissue regeneration.

DECLARATIONS

Authors’ contributions

Made substantial contributions to conception and writing of the review and performed the literature analysis and interpretation: Tresoldi MM, Faga A

Made substantial contributions to writing of the review: Nicoletti G

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Financial support and sponsorship

None.

Conflicts of interest

All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2022.