Study on High-yield Potential for Maize Varieties in Mountain Area of Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau

2015-02-24 13:05JunjiaoGUANPengZHANGQingmeiHUANGHuiZHANGYunfengZHANGYanlinWANGBaoshuWANGJianhuaZHANG
Agricultural Science & Technology 2015年11期
关键词:夏玉米学报性状

JunjiaoGUAN,PengZHANG,QingmeiHUANG,HuiZHANG,YunfengZHANG,Yanlin WANG,Baoshu WANG,Jianhua ZHANG*

1.Quanlity Standard and Testing Technology Research Institute,Yunnan Academy of Agriculture Sciences,Kunming 650223,China;2.Chuxiong State Research and Extension Institute of Agricultural Science,Chuxiong 675000,China;3.Huizhe State Agricultural Technology Promotion Center,Qujing 675000,China;4.Economic Crops Workstation of Dayao County,Chuxiong 675000,China

Contributed by improved cultivation technology and updated field management,the yield of maize per unit area went up dramatically.It is notable that to enhance planting density is a key technology[1-2]and to increase N fertilizer is a crucial way for improving maize yield[3].However,the increasingly applied N fertilizer would always result in environment pollution and eco-condition deterioration.Therefore,it has become a great concern for plant nutritionists and plant breeders to raise use rate of N fertilizer,improve eco-environment and boost economic development[4-6].

Crop yield is a result of interplay between gene and environment and tends to be volatile upon crop variety,environment and cultivation[7-10].Yunnan is situated in a mountainous area,characterized by complicated environment and diversified soil type and resulting from elevation and landform differences,climate tends to be diversified,affecting maize growth and development.Maize developmentis confronted by how to achieve highyield,high-quality and low-consumption and environment-friendly production by integrating cultivation measures,crop character and fertilizer application[11].

The research investigated the effects of planting density (52 500,67 500 and 82 500 plant/hm2)and nitrogen rate (four rates)on yields of Yunrui No.8,Yunrui No.6 and Yunrui No.88 in different eco-conditions,providing theoretical references and guidance for promotion of new varieties.

Materials and Methods

Test materials

Yunrui No.8,Yunrui No.6 and Yunrui No.88 were provided by Yun-nan Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

Test design

The test was conducted in Zhehai Town(Huize County),Yaozhanjie Village (Chuxiong City),Xiaojie Town(Chongming County),Malong County(Qujing City)and Dayao County(Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture)simultaneously,based on local major cultivars were selected as control.The climate condition was shown in Table 1 and the test was by uniform design with three replications.Besides,planting density included 52 500,67 500 and 82 500 plant/hm2,and N fertilizers,containing 46.6% nitrogen,were applied at 600 and 900 kg/hm2as per local methodand controlled in time.Specifically,fertilization with time and space controlled involved three stages,as follows:during the 4th-6thleaf stage,maize was applied with soils added with 10 kg maize specific compound fertilizers in the depth of 5-10 cm;during small bell stage,maize was applied with soils and 10 kg maize specific compound fertilizers with depth of 8-10 cm;during large bell stage,maize was applied with soils and 15 kg maize specific compound fertilizers with depth of 15-20 cm.Othercultivationandmanagement were the same as local method.

During tasseling stage,10 plants were selected from every test plot randomly to explore indices,such as leaf length,leaf width,stem diameter of the 2ndinternode,ear height and plant height,as well as ear height coefficient.After maize ripeness,10 plants were surveyed in terms of ear length,ear thickness,the number of ear row,the number of seed per row,the weight per ear,the weight of seed per ear,the rate of seed,and thousandseed weight.

Results and Analysis

Comparisons of major economic traits of maize in different eco-conditions

As shown in Table 2,neither same maize variety in different ecoconditions nor different varieties in the same eco-condition performed diversified.Forexample,YunruiNo.88 reached the highest in yield in Xiaojie Town(Chongming County),increasing by 15.51% than that of local dominant varieties.Besides,Yunrui No.8 and Yunrui No.6 also proved high in yield,but decreased by 4.33% and 2.96%.What’s more,Yunrui No.88 performed better also in Zhehai Town and Dayao County,which indicated that Yunrui grows well in the areas from middle to high elevations.

Effects of densities on plant shape,ear character and yield

In the treatment with high planting density,plant height,ear height and earposition coefficeintmaintained stable,but leaf width and stem thickness changed dramatically(Table 3).Besides,of the three varieties,stem thickness and leaf area were decreasing upon planting density.Additionally,plant height and ear position were significantly lower than those of the other two varieties,and ear position height showed insignificant differencesamong the three varieties.

In the treatment with planting density of 82 500 plant/hm2,ear length,the number of seed per row,and thousand-seed weight all declined considerably,but the number of ear per row and seed rate were less affected(Table 4).Besides,yields of the three varieties were all increasing dramatically upon planting density.These incorporated that high density has adverse effects on ear characters,compensated by yield-increasing effects.Of the three varieties,Yunrui No.88achieved the highest yield,especially in the treatment with high density,which demonstrated that Yunrui No.88 is tolerant to high density,enjoying high yield potential.

Table 1 Eco-conditions of test sites

Table 2 Comparisons of economic characters in different ecological conditions

Table 3 Effects of planting density on maize plant

Table 4 Effects of planting density on maize yield and yield components

Effects of fertilizer quantities on plant shape,ear character and yield

The treatments with urea quantities of 600 and 900 kg/hm2had insignificant effects on plant shape,ear characters and yield.However,provided that fertilization with time and space controlled,a high yield can be reached only with applied fertilizer at 600 kg/hm2.These suggested that to increase N fertilizer is an important way for improving maize yield,but excessive N fertilizer would result in environment pollution.It is recommended to N fertilizer should be applied with a rational way.

Discussion

The growth of maize requires different eco-conditions upon varieties.Yunnan owns diversified eco-environment,which should be taken into consideration in variety cultivation and promotion.For instance,yield of Yunrui No.88 grew more in Zhehai Town,Xiajie Town and Dayao County;yield of Yunrui No.8 reached the highest in Yaozhanjie Village and of Yunrui No.6 the highest in Malong County.In general,yield of Yunrui No.88 kept increasing from low-elevation to high-elevation areas.

The yield of maize per plant is decided by the number of seed per ear and seed weight,and the improvement of planting density would lead to ear character deterioration[13].According to the test results,ear length,the number ofseed per ear,thousand-seed weight,stalk diameter and leaf area were decreasing upon planting density,which coincided with previous researches.Although seed yield was declining upon density,the yields of the three varieties all grew,indicating that high density had adverse effects on ear characters,but compensated by yield-increasing effects from high density.Besides,the three varieties enjoy the potential of yield increasing provided planting density of 82 500 plant/hm2.

Either local fertilization method or fertilization quantities of 600 and 900 kg/hm2have insignificant effects on plant shape,ear characters and yield.In contrast,the fertilization method with time and space controlled reduced N fertilizers,butincreased maize yield.

Yunrui No.88,with the highest potential,can be widely promoted due to good plant shape,optimal plant height and ear height,as well as high tolerance to high density.

Table 5 Effects of fertilizations on maize plants

Table 6 Effects of fertilizations on maize yield and yield components

[1]LIU W(刘伟),LU P(吕鹏),SU K(苏凯),et al.Effects of planting density on the grain yield and source-sink characteristics of summer maize(种植密度对夏玉米产量和源库特性的影响 [J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology(应用生态学报),2010,21(7):1737-1743.

[2]YANG JS(杨吉顺),GAO HY(高辉远),LIU P(刘鹏),et al.Effects of planting density and row spacing on canopy apparentphotosynthesis ofhigh-yield summer corn(种植密度和行距配置对超高产夏玉米群体光合特性的影响)[J].Acta Agronomica Sinica(作物学报),2010,36(7):1226-1233.

[3]SONG B(宋碧),ZHANG RD(张荣达),ZHANG J(张军),et al.Impact of different nitrogen fertilizer application rates on corn growth and yield in mountain area of norhtwest Guizhou(不同施氮量对黔西北山区玉米生长及产量的影响)[J].Guizhou Agricultural Sceinces(贵州农业科学),2013(7):78-81.

[4]DUV ICK DN,C ASSM AN KG,POST.Green revolution trend sin yield potential of tempeate maize in the north-central United States.Crop Science,1999,39:1622-1630.

[5]LIU W,LU P,SU K,et al.Effects of planting density on the grain yield and source-sink characteristics of summer maize,Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,Jul 2010,21(7):1737-1743.

[6]CHEN XP(陈新平),ZHOU JP(周金池),WANG XR (王兴仁),et al.economic and environmental evaluation on models for describing crop yield response to nitrogen fertilizers at winter-wheat and summer-corn rotation system(小麦一玉米轮作制中氮肥效应模型的选择-经济和环境效应分析),Acta Pedologica Sinica(土壤学报),2000,37(3):346-354.

[7]YANG SM(杨世民),ZHENG SL(郑顺林),SHI HC (石海春),et al.Research on high yield and high density of compact corn Zhenghong No.6 in different eco-conditions(不同生态条件下紧凑型玉米正红6号高产密肥优化研究)[J].Journal of Maize Sciences(玉米科学),2010,18(2):96-99.

[8]XIE B(谢冰),KE YP(柯永培),YUAN JC(袁继超),et al.High-yield and high-efficient cultivation model of Zhenghong No.211 in Panzhihua and Xichang(攀西地区优质玉米正红211高产高效栽培模式研究)[J].Journal of Maize Sciences(玉米科学),2007,15(3):107-109,132.

[9]LI YJ(李毅杰),WANG WZ(王维赞),HE H(何红),et al.Study on sugarcane drip irrigation water amount based on water surface evaporation(基于蒸发皿水面蒸发量的甘蔗滴灌栽培灌溉量研究)[J].Guangxi Agricultural Sciences(南方农业学报),2013,44(7):1130-1134.

[10]ZHANG HS(张洪生),ZHAO M(赵明),WU PB(吴沛波).Effects of planting density on maize stalk and ear characters(种植密度对玉米茎秆和穗部性状的影响)[J].Journal of Maize Sciences(玉米科学),2009,17(5):130-133.

[11]WANG HT(王宏庭),WANG B(王斌),ZHAO PP (赵萍萍),et al.Influence of plant arrangement,density and the rate of fertilizer applied on maize yield and fertilizer use efficiency(种植方式、密度、施肥量对玉米产量和肥料利用率的影响)[J].Journal of Maize Sciences(玉米科学),2009,17(5):104-107.

[12]WANG J(王俊),LIU Z(刘正),LI B(李波).Analysis on ecological adaptation of maize hybrid in different regions(玉米杂交种在不同地区的生态适应性分析)[J].Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences (安徽农业科学),2009,37(16):7403-7405.

[13]YANG Y(杨艳),LENG YK(冷远康).Research on the Relationship between Sowing Density and Maize(Zea maysL.)Yield and Main Agronomic Traits(不同种植密度下玉米主要农性状及其产量的关系研究)[J].Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences(安徽农业科学),2014(6):1647-1649,1652.

猜你喜欢
夏玉米学报性状
“7532B”母种不同系统性状比较
《北京航空航天大学学报》征稿简则
《北京航空航天大学学报》征稿简则
有机物料还田对夏玉米穗位叶光合性能及氮代谢的影响
《北京航空航天大学学报》征稿简则
气象条件对济南市济阳区夏玉米生长发育的影响
——以2020年为例
《北京航空航天大学学报》征稿简则
鉴定对照种“菁松×皓月”的茧丝质性状稳定性分析
巴西2020—2021年度夏玉米产量预计减少17.7%
夏玉米高产高效栽培技术