任金钢
颈椎退变对外伤性颈髓损伤的影响探讨
任金钢
目的 就颈椎退变对外伤性颈髓损伤的影响进行探讨。方法 将我院收治的40例外伤性颈髓损伤患者按轻、中、重三种程度将其随机分为A、B、C三组,比较三组患者术前、术后JOA评分和SF-36量表总体健康因子评分。结果 三组患者术前、术后JOA评分均有改善,组间比较A组患者优于B组患者和C组患者,而B组患者同样优于C组患者,A组患者的改善率为95%,B组患者的改善率为80%,C组患者的改善率为55%,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。三组患者术前、术后SF-36量表总体健康因子评分比较均有显著差异,组间比较A组优于B、C两组,而B组优于C组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 颈椎退变使得颈髓损伤的手术治疗具有较大的难度,因此,加大颈椎退变的预防至关重要。
颈椎退变;外伤性颈髓损伤;影响
本文主要选取我院2012年10月~2013年10月收治的40例外伤性颈髓损伤患者,对其临床特征及治疗过程进行回顾性分析,从而探讨颈椎退变对外伤性颈髓损伤的影响。
1.1 一般资料
选取我院2012年10月~2013年10月收治的外伤性颈髓损伤患者40例,按轻、中、重三种程度将其随机分为三组。其中男21例,女19例,年龄51~72岁,平均年龄(56.5±2.3)岁;其中跌倒伤10例,重物砸伤9例,锻炼扭伤6例,车祸伤10例,坠落伤5例。三组患者在年龄、性别等一般资料方面均无显著性差异,具有可比性。
1.2 方法
三组患者均行骨科常规处理,包括对患者损伤的程度进行快速、准确的评价,给予积极的肺部抗感染治疗和相应合并症的对症治疗以及纠正电解质紊乱和维持水盐平衡。根据损伤部分针对性给予手术治疗并行常规神经营养、脱水、抗炎以及功能锻炼。
1.3 疗效判定
1.3.1 神经功能恢复 利用JOA评分标准对患者神经功能恢复情况进行评价,记录患者术前、术后评分并计算改善率[1]。
1.3.2 生存质量 利用SF-36量表和总体健康因子评分对患者的整体健康状况进行评分,分值越高则患者的生存质量越高。
1.4 统计学分析
对所得数据资料全部采用SPSS18.0统计软件进行统计分析,组间及组内比较用t检验。P<0.05时,差异有统计学意义。
三组患者术前、术后JOA评分均有改善,组间比较A组患者优于B组患者和C组患者,而B组患者同样优于C组患者,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组患者的改善率为95%,B组患者的改善率为80%,C组患者的改善率为55%,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。三组患者术前、术后SF-36量表总体健康因子评分比较均有显著差异,组间比较A组优于B、C两组,而B组优于C组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
外伤性颈髓损伤是脊柱外科常见的疾病之一,多见于胸腰段颈髓损伤。对外伤性颈髓损伤患者神经功能受损严重程度造成影响的因素比较多,如外伤类型、年龄、骨折脱位情况及暴力因素等[2]。在老年外伤性颈髓损伤患者中有超过一半的患者存在脊椎退变基础,由此可见,颈椎退变是轻微能量创伤即导致颈椎颈髓发生较严重损伤的高危因素。因此,在对外伤性颈髓损伤患者的治疗过程中,探讨颈椎退变对患者病情的相关影响并进行分析,可在一定程度上为临床治疗提供相关依据。
[1] 何伟,钱宇,张军,等. 颈椎退变对外份陛颈髓损伤的影响[J].中国骨伤,2012,28(9):737-742.
[2] 蒋继乐,董健. 多节段颈椎退变性疾病手术方式的研究进展[J].中华骨科杂志,2011,31(12):1382-1386.
To Explore the Effect of Cervical Vertebra Degeneration for the Patients with Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
REN Jingang The people's hospital of Suileng County in Suihua city of Heilongjiang Province, Suihua 152200, China
Objective To explore the effect of cervical vertebra degeneration for the patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.
Methods 60 cases of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury patients in our hospital were selected in this study. They were divided into three groups according the situation. The patients with the stage of illness of light, medium and heavy were divided into the A, B and C group, respectively. We compared the results including the preoperative and postoperative JOA score and the SF-36 scale between the three groups. Results The results of postoperative JOA scores were better than that before the operation in all of the three groups. And the results of the A group was higher than that of group B and C, while results of group B were better than that of group C, with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The improvement rate of group A, B and C were 95%, 80% and 55%, respectively with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The SF-36 scale score before and after the operations of all the three groups were significantly different. And the results of the A group was higher than that of group B and C, while results of group B were better than that of group C, with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion The cervical vertebra degeneration makes the operation of cervical spinal cord injury more difficult. Therefore, we should prevent the cervical vertebra degeneration..
Cervical vertebra degeneration, Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury, Influence
R681.5
B
1674-9308(2015)07-0056-02
10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2015.07.045
152200 黑龙江省绥化市绥棱县人民医院