Diabetes epidemic in the Asia Pacific region: has hemoglobin A1C finally earned its place as a diagnostic tool?

Alexandra Bagley, Usman H. Malabu

1James Cook University Department of Medicine, Mackay Clinical School, MackayBaseHospital, Bridge Road Mackay, QLD 4740, Australia

2Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, the Townsville Hospital 100 Angus Smith Drive Douglas, QLD 4814, Australia

Diabetes epidemic in the Asia Pacific region: has hemoglobin A1C finally earned its place as a diagnostic tool?

Alexandra Bagley1, Usman H. Malabu2*

1James Cook University Department of Medicine, Mackay Clinical School, MackayBaseHospital, Bridge Road Mackay, QLD 4740, Australia

2Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, the Townsville Hospital 100 Angus Smith Drive Douglas, QLD 4814, Australia

PEER REVIEW

Peer reviewer

A/Prof. David Porter, Group Laboratory Manager, Pathology Queensland, Past President Australasian College of Tropical Medicine, Australia.

Tel: +61 7443 32400

Fax: +61 7443 32415

E-mail: david.porter@health.qld.gov. au

Comments

This is a well-researched and presented paper that will be especially helpful to clinicians and public health administrators tasked with implementing and managing regimes to treat the growing number of diabetic patients along with problems associated with their comorbidities.

Details on Page 88

Two-third of the world’s population lives in the Asia Pacific region where prevalence of diabetes has reached epidemic proportion. With China and India being the most populous nations on the globe, it is believed that over 150 million diabetes reside in the region with more than 95% being of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Furthermore, other Pacific islands in the region have high rates of T2DM including Tonga, Fiji, French Polynesia, and Nauru. The latter has the highest prevalence of T2DM per population in the world. Over the past two decades, in Australia and New Zealand, the prevalence of T2DM has more than doubled, mainly amongst the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and Maori peoples respectively. With the increasing prevalence of diabetes in the Asia Pacific region coupled with the limited number of resources, use of a reliable and effective mode of diagnosis for T2DM is warranted. Yet to date, only New Zealand has adopted the American Diabetes Association recommendation of using hemoglobin A1C in the diagnosis of the disease. The aim of this review is to discuss the clinical usefulness of hemoglobin A1C and highlight its diagnostic role in the Asia Pacific region where T2DM is increasingly encountered.

Hemoglobin A1C, Diagnostic tool, Asia Pacific region

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a concerning health problem for the Asia Pacific region where late diagnosis and poor monitoring is associated with increased risk of microvascular and macrovascular disease, disability and mortality often prematurely[1-3]. Recently, the Australian diabetes, obesity and lifestyle study indicated that in a national sample of those aged greater than 25 years old, there was an overall DM prevalence of 7.5%, with an estimated 50% of these cases being previously undiagnosed[4]. The importance of early and accurate diagnosis has been proven to significantly reduce the risk of unwanted complications as demonstrated by the United Kingdom prospective diabetes study[5]. Prior to 2010, blood glucose analysis has been the exclusive and gold standard method to diagnose T2DM. However, recently the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Diabetes Federation has recommended hemoglobin A1C(HbA1C) as a diagnostic test[6]. Although it is not currently recommended in all but one of the Asia Pacific countries, many physicians globally have taken a liking to HbA1Cand this newfound use. Historically, HbA1Chas previously only been utilized to monitor glycemic control and guide therapy in those already diagnosed[5,7]. With a strong correlation able to be made between HbA1Cand retinopathy, as well as other microvascular complications, the convenience of sampling HbA1Cat any time without regard to food ingestion removes the methodological, procedural and practical problems of measuring blood glucose levels[7,8]. This report will further discuss the concepts behind HbA1Cand the scientific method of its application, the advancement and validity in its practical implementation, its limits, as well as its usefulness in the detection of millions of people who would otherwise be left undiagnosed, particularly in rural and remote regions of the Asia Pacific.

2. Hemoglobin A1C in clinical practice

2.1. Biochemical basis of HbA1C

The discovery of HbA1Cand its association with blood glucose measurements have been rigorously investigated since the 1960s. Rahbar initially identified HbA1Cas an“unusual hemoglobin in patients with diabetes”[9]. However, at the same time, despite there being a strong suspicion that hyperglycemia was associated with vascular complications, it was difficult to prove without an objective marker of glucose control[7]. With this purpose and need for a marker in mind, throughout the following two decades, multiple studies were conducted to find the correlation between HbA1Cand glucose measurements. It became widely published that HbA1Cwas the hemoglobin component of an erythrocyte that was composed of glycohemoglobin[9]. With the erythrocyte cell membrane being highly permeable, hemoglobin was easily exposed to intracellular levels of glucose. During these occasions, via nonenzymatic attachment, glucose bound to the N-terminal valine on the β chain of hemoglobin, forming HbA1C[10]. With the attachment of glucose to the hemoglobin remaining there for the lifetime of the erythrocyte, it became apparent that the amount of HbA1Cthat was formed would reflect the level of glucose exposure. As the life span of an erythrocyte on average is approximately 120 d, blood sample at any given time would include erythrocytes of different ages with varying degrees of exposure to glucose[10]. Despite elder erythrocytes being exposed to more hyperglycemia, younger erythrocytes are more prominent in a blood sample. With approximately 50% of HbA1Crepresenting blood glucose levels over the preceding 30 d, and 10% the previous 90-120 d, the measured HbA1Cwas able to be extrapolated to provide an estimation of average glucose control over the past 2-3 months[10]. The method selected to measure HbA1Cis dependent on the laboratory, with approximately 100 different ways of doing so. The use of antibodies in immunoassays and cation-exchange chromatography are two methods most widely used to efficiently separate the glycated from the non-glycated hemoglobin[7]. Regression equations, developed using data from earlier studies, are then used to generate average blood glucose levels from HbA1C, ultimately aiding in the development of current DM management guidelines[7].

2.2. Application and validity of HbA1C

By the 1980s, the association between glucose control and HbA1Cand development of diabetic complications was evident, supporting the implementation of HbA1Cto the clinical environment; a recognizable cornerstone in clinical practice[4]. Two studies, the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and the UK Prospective Diabetes Study, cleverly illustrated that in both type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and T2DM, intensive blood glucose control, obvious in blood glucose and HbA1Cmeasurements, decreased the risk of microvascular complications[10]. Both studies also demonstrated how the HbA1Cresult can allow the establishment of specific treatment goals; appropriate lifestyle and medication adjustment[10]. On the basis of the results from these trials, DM organizations globally began and currently still use HbA1Cas a significant tool to monitor glucose control and guide management[6]. The current Australian DM guideline outlines that the general HbA1Ctarget in people with T2DM is less or equal to 7%[8]. A result greater than 7% in those without severe hypoglycemia, limited life expectancy, or co-morbidities and who isn’t elderly, should prompt more active hypoglycemic treatment as suggested by the International Diabetes Federation[6]. It is further recommended that both those patients with T1DM or T2DM have their HbA1Ctested every 3-6 months[10,11]. Although target levels are specified and provide ranges to guide point of intervention, most importantly, as the guidelines state, any significant reduction in HbA1Cwill improve patient outcomes; with each 1% reduction resulting in a 20% to 40% decrease in risk of developing complications[4].

2.3 Advances in the utilization of HbA1C

To reduce the risk of impact of T2DM, both micro and macrovascular complications, early diagnosis is recognized as the ultimate solution[8]. However, for the presence or absence of a chronic disease to be determined, a diagnostic tool must have a low degree of intra-individual variation[7]. With the fasting plasma glucose and oral glucose tolerance tests both performing poorly on this measure, further use of HbA1Cas a diagnostic tool has been pondered for the past decade. In 1997, expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of DM and another group in 2003 failed to recommend the use of HbA1Cin the diagnosis of T2DM due to lack of standardization and no consensus on an appropriate cut-off point for DM identification[7]. In 2009 however, another international expert committee examined data on retinopathy prevalence and glycemic measures from nine countries and determined that HbA1Cof 6.5% recognizes thecut-point at which retinopathy begins to occur[6,7]. This finding, together with almost universal standardization of HbA1Cmeasurement as a result of a National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program, has encouraged the recommendation for HbA1Cto be used to diagnose T2DM[8,12]. To date, the American Diabetes Association added HbA1Cinto its 2010 clinical practice recommendations with a cut-off value of 6.5% or greater alongside the glucose based criteria[3]. Although New Zealand adopted its use[13], other countries in the Asia Pacific region have yet to add HbA1Cas a diagnostic tool, but as stated in 2012 Australian guidelines for diabetes management in general practice, it is a policy that maybe adopted in the future[4,8]. In Australia to date, Medicare does not fund HbA1Cas a diagnostic or screening test for diabetes, only recognizing its use for those previously diagnosed, and further requiring evidence of such on the request form[3]. A systematic review conducted by WHO, compared fasting plasma glucose and HbA1Cwith the 10-year incidence of retinopathy. It revealed that HbA1Cof 6.5% had a positive predictive value of 15.9%, negative predictive value of 97%, a sensitivity of 7.9% and a specificity of 97%[14]. Therefore, this indicates that as a diagnostic test, when a positive diagnosis is made, it is highly likely to be correct. When practical considerations are considered alongside this finding, such as not requiring the patient to fast or undergo special preparation, allowing more convenient opportunistic screening in the usual clinic setting, and results not being influenced by short term stressors such as hospitalization and acute illness, it seems logical that this advancement in the utilization of HbA1Cas a diagnostic tool should be pursued sooner rather than later within the Asia Pacific region[15].

2.4. Practical implementation of HbA1Cas a diagnostic tool in remote areas

With an increasing trend of reported T2DM in remote and rural areas of the Asia Pacific region, it is obvious that a diagnostic and monitoring solution that is opportunistic and allows immediate and easily interpretable results is necessary[1,15]. For instance, HbA1Cin the form of point of care (POC), testing in Australia’s rural and remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities seems ideal given the high specificity of the test and recognizing the largely nomadic nature of these communities. A study conducted in a remote aboriginal community in Australia, assessed and compared the accuracy of POC measurements of capillary blood glucose and HbA1Clevels. At the conclusion of the study, they found that POC capillary HbA1Ctesting offered an accurate, practical, community-friendly way of monitoring DM, and illustrated how incorporating HbA1Cas a diagnostic tool in these communities would be beneficial[16]. The precision of HbA1Ctesting was less than 3%, allowing clinically significant changes in serial HbA1Cconcentrations to be detected. These positive findings were compared to POC capillary glucose testing where conclusions at the end of the study recommended that results be confirmed by a laboratory test of venous plasma if they were likely to significantly influence clinical decisions. This is due to POC and laboratory results for glucose concentration showing a concentration-dependent difference[16]. These findings are particularly relevant when considering the distance between clinical settings and the laboratory in rural and remote communities. The distance patients often have to travel to access health care when there is uncertainty as to whether the patient has fasted, and when often dealing with a population where health is not a major priority. Hence, inclusion of HbA1Cin the Australian guidelines outlining the diagnostic criteria for T2DM seems practical in the future, and even more so in rural and remote regions of the Asia Pacific, where early, accurate and on the spot diagnosis is essential[1,2].

2.5. Cost effectiveness of HbA1Cas a diagnostic tool

In order to improve population health in the Asia Pacific region where diabetes has reached epidemic proportion, replacement of a cost ineffective intervention to a costeffective one is often necessary[5]. Hence, before the implementation of HbA1Cas a diagnostic tool, various countries performed a cost effective analysis to ensure the highest possible overall level of population health. Using population-based data, a study conducted in Germany compared the cost effectiveness of HbA1C, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and fasting plasma glucose tests in the diagnosis of those with T2DM. It concluded that the most cost-effective diagnostic strategy was HbA1Ccombined with OGTT. Although costs were lower when attempting diagnosis with fasting plasma glucose combined with OGTT or OGTT alone, these tests detected only about one-third to onefourth of subjects with previously undiagnosed diabetes[17]. No cost effective analysis has been conducted in Australia to date with regards to HbA1Cand the diagnosis of T2DM. However, in 2012, the Australian Diabetes Society and the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia applied for an analytic protocol that will be used to guide the assessment of the safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of HbA1Cin making the diagnosis of T2DM and a listing on the Medicare Benefits Schedule[5]. This analysis is still pending. However, it is interesting to note some of the cost effective proposals listed in the application with regards to HbA1Cas a diagnostic test. With HbA1Chaving the ability to diagnose and assess the severity in one test, this enables the practitioner to initiate management on the confirmatory return visit, resulting in decreased costs as a result of fewer returned general practice consultations[18]. Long-term health costs would also decrease, with early detection enabling early management and reducing risk of developing complications[17]. The HbA1Ctest is also less time consuming than OGTT, and easier to tolerate orally. Although data available is limited, it is evident from the above study and the suggestions outlined in the Australian proposal, which may also be applicable to other countries in the region. Hence, HbA1Cshould without doubt be considered a cost beneficial intervention in the diagnosis of T2DM.

2.6. Limitations to the use of HbA1Cas a diagnostic and monitoring tool

As with many clinical tools, there are various genetic, hematologic and illness related factors as well as laboratory variances that can influence HbA1Cresults. Therefore, they are important to be conscious of during analysis and when determining its potential role in the diagnosis and management of T2DM. Studies have demonstrated that the intra-individual variance of HbA1Cin patients without DM is minimal, less than 1%[4]. However, there is variance among individuals and this can be attributed to genetic related factors, age and the environment. Studies involving twins with T1DM suggest a strong genetic influence[3]. Approximately 33% of an inherited variance is said to be related to a “glycation gap”, which is the difference between the predicted HbA1Cand the actual HbA1C[4]. This can be influenced by differences in erythrocyte transmembrane gradient, which will vary the degree of glucose entry into the erythrocyte, as well as diphosphoglycerate and pH levels within the cell[10]. A large amount of evidence is also surfacing to support the idea that race may perhaps affect levels of HbA1C[4,7]. Various studies have reported significant differences in HbA1Cconcentrations among different racial groups after adjusting for factors likely to influence glycemia. One study by Tsugawaet al.illustrated that Mexican Americans and African Americans had higher average HbA1Cvalues compared to white Americans[19]. All this said however, remains unclear whether these reports have clinical significance, and perhaps, as authors speculated, a delay in diagnosis is the reason for different levels of HbA1Cbetween “black” and “white” Americans[19,20]. Given the current variation in HbA1Cconcentrations is less than or equal to 0.4%, no consensus has been reached regarding different cutoffs of HbA1Cfor different racial groups[4]. Hematological and other illness related factors, particularly those that alter the normal life span of erythrocytes, such as splenomegaly, rheumatoid arthritis, acute blood loss, iron deficiency anemia and chronic alcoholism, could substantially alter the level of HbA1C, providing an inaccurate estimation of blood glucose control[10]. An important analytical factor to keep in mind is the clinical variances between laboratories and within laboratories given there are over 100 different methods of measurement[3]. With standardization being a major priority in Australia, further improvements are soon to be achieved following a national whole blood external quality control program developed by the Royal College of Pathologists of Australia and the Australian Association of Clinical Biochemists[4].

3. Conclusion

In conclusion, given 7.5% of the Asia Pacific population aged 25 years and older have T2DM and for every person diagnosed or undiagnosed, the role of HbA1Cand its possible value in diagnosing this chronic disease earlier is a worthwhile topic to have discussed[2]. With most undiagnosed diabetic patients having recognizable risk factors and 90% of these attending their general practitioner each year, it is apparent that a more simple and efficient diagnostic test is long overdue[15]. Not only have studies illustrated the importance of early diagnosis and immediate effective management to reduce the risk of developing the detrimental sequelae, but they have found that more effective glycemic control early results in long term benefits even if control eventually deteriorates[3]. Unlike America, where diagnostic use of HbA1Cin T2DM has already been established, Asia Pacific countries have largely yet to completely recognize and implement such a convenient, accurate and opportunistic way of sampling. Until then, HbA1Cremains only to be a form of glucose control monitoring in those already diagnosed. The longer the delay, the more likely those populations at high risk of T2DM in the region continuing to remain undiagnosed. Without regarding to food ingestion in sampling, it makes it more likely that HbA1Cwill result in detection of millions undiagnosed, making it a cost effective initiative as discussed above. Despite the limitations resulting in HbA1Cnot being an appropriate test to confirm diagnosis in those with a chronic medical disease, or who have anemia or another abnormality to their erythrocytes, HbA1Ccan be measured accurately in the vast majority of people[7,11]. Hence overall, HbA1Cis a clinical tool whose use needs to be extended from simply monitoring glucose control to the diagnosis of T2DM in order to achieve improved outcomes and ultimately major long term health and cost benefits for the Asia Pacific region.

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Australia’s James Cook University Faculty Research (Grant No. JCU-ECR 6250-2013).

Comments

Background

Diabetes is a significant emergent disease in the Asia Pacific region that requires accurate and timely diagnosis to ensure effective and uniform management. The HbA1Ctest is now well recognized internationally as an appropriate diagnostic test. The paper examines the appropriateness of widely adopting this test for use in the Asia Pacific region.

Research frontiers

This paper has the potential to catalyse the widespread introduction of HbA1Ctesting for diabetes diagnosis throughout the Asia Pacific region. The authors have comprehensively researched the auguments for its introduction and have presented these in a clear and compelling form.

Related reports

Prevalence studies of diabetes in China have recently been published by Yanget al. It is estimated that over 150 million diabetics reside in the Asia Pacific region with over 95% being T2DM. Other papers cited validate the use of HbA1Cas a diagnostic tool and include the advantages over the current methods and known limitations of the test.

Innovations and breakthroughs

This is a novel paper in its approach in that it builds a well-researched and evidenced rationale for the introduction of HbA1Ctesting as a diagnostic screening tool for diabetes in the Asia Pacific region.

Applications

With the growing and significant number of diabetes cases in the Asia Pacific region, a proven cost effective screening methodology to manage this public health epidemic is required. This paper provides a strong evidence based approach to suggest an appropriate rationale.

Peer review

This is a well-researched and presented paper that will be especially helpful to clinicians and public health administrators tasked with implementing and managing regimes to treat the growing number of diabetic patients along with problems associated with their comorbidities.

[1] Yang SH, Dou KF, Song WJ. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. N Engl J Med 2010; 362(25): 2425-2426.

[2] Routley VM. The emerging epidemic of type 2 diabetes -an Asian Pacific perspective. On The Risk 2011; 27(3): 72-76.

[3] Hilton DJ, O’Rourke PK, Welborn TA, Reid CM. Diabetes detection in Australian general practice: a comparison of diagnostic criteria. Med J Aust 2002; 176(3): 104-107.

[4] d’Emden MC, Shaw JE, Colman PG, Colagiuri S, Twigg SM, Jones GR, et al. The role of HbA1Cin the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in Australia. Med J Aust 2012; 197(4): 220-221.

[5] Kirkman MS, Kendall DM. Hemoglobin A1C to diagnose diabetes: why the controversy over adding a new tool? Clin Chem 2011; 57(2): 255-257.

[6] Consensus Committee. Consensus statement on the worldwide standardization of the hemoglobin A1C measurement: the American Diabetes Association, European Association for the Study of Diabetes, International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, and the International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Care 2007; 30(9): 2399-2400.

[7] Little RR, Rohlfing CL, Sacks DB, National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) Steering Committee. Status of hemoglobin A1C measurement and goals for improvement: from chaos to order for improving diabetes care. Clin Chem 2011; 57(2): 205-214.

[8] Diabetes Australia. Diabetes management in general practice: guidelines for type 2 diabetes. Canberra: Diabetes Australia; 2012. [Online] Available from: http://www.diabetesaustralia. com.au/Documents/DA/What’s%20New/12.10.02%20Diabetes%20 Management%20in%20General%20Practice.pdf. [Accessed on 22nd October, 2013]

[9] Rahbar S, Blumenfeld O, Ranney HM. Studies of an unusual hemoglobin in patients with diabetes mellitus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1969; 36(5): 838-843.

[10] Gallagher EJ, Roith DL, Bloomgarden Z. Review of hemoglobin A1C in the management of diabetes. J Diabetes 2009; 1(1): 9-17.

[11] Sacks DB. A1C verses glucose testing: a comparison. Diabetes Care 2011; 34(2): 518-523.

[12] Cheung NW, Conn JJ, d’Emden MC, Gunton JE, Jenkins AJ, Ross GP, et al. Position statement of the Australian Diabetes Society: individualization of glycated hemoglobin targets for adults with diabetes mellitus. Med J Aust 2009; 191(6): 339-344.

[13] Florkowski C, Crooke M. Standardisation of reporting hemoglobin A1C: adoption of the New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes (NZSSD) position statement. N Z Med J 2010; 123(1310): 43-49.

[14] World Health Organisation. HbA1Cin the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2006. [Online] Available from: http://www.who.int/diabetes/ publications/sys_rev_hba1c_web.pdf. [Accessed on 22nd October, 2013]

[15] Peng G, Lin M, Zhang K, Chen J, Wang Y, Yang Y, et al. Hemoglobin A1C can identify more cardiovascular and metabolic risk profile in OGTT-negative Chinese population. Int J Med Sci 2013; 10(8): 1028-1034.

[16] Martin DD, Shephard MD, Freeman H, Bulsara MK, Jones TW, Davis EA, et al. Point-of-care testing of HbA1C and blood glucose in a remote Aboriginal Australian community. Med J Aust 2005; 182(10): 524-527.

[17] Icks A, Haastert B, Gandjour A, John J, Löwel H, Holle R, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of different screening procedures for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004; 27(9): 2120-2128.

[18] Ryan K. HbA1C best option for diabetes diagnosis. Med J Aust 2012; 197: 220-221.

[19] Tsugawa Y, Mukamal KJ, Davis RB, Taylor WC, Wee CC. Should the hemoglobin A(1C) diagnostic cutoff differ between blacks and whites?: a cross-sectional study. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157(3): 153-159.

[20] Kirk JK, Bell RA, Bertoni AG, Arcury TA, Quandt SA, Goff DC Jr, et al. Ethnic disparities: control of glycemia, blood pressure, and LDL cholesterol among US adults with type 2 diabetes. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39(9): 1489-1501.

10.1016/S2221-1691(14)60214-8

*Corresponding author: Usman H. Malabu, Associate Professor, Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, the Townsville Hospital, 100 Angus Smith Drive Douglas, QLD 4814, Australia.

Tel: +61 7443 31111

E-mail: usman.malabu@jcu.edu.au

Foundation Project: Supported by Australia’s James Cook University Faculty Research (Grant No. JCU-ECR 6250-2013).

Article history:

Received 25 Nov 2013

Received in revised form 2 Dec, 2nd revised form 10 Dec, 3rd revised form 15 Dec 2013

Accepted 25 Jan 2014

Available online 28 Feb 2014