Hosm Alzhrni,Debr Shirley,Soni W.M.Cheng,Mrtin Mckey,
Emmanuel Stamatakisc,*
a Discipline of Physiotherapy,Faculty of Health Sciences,The University of Sydney,Sydney,NSW 2006,Australia
b Physiotherapy Department,College of Applied Medical Science,Taif University,Taif 21974,Saudi Arabia
c Charles Perkins Centre,Prevention Research Collaboration,School of Public Health,The University of Sydney,Sydney,NSW 2006,Australia
Abstract Background:Little is known about the association between different types of physical activity(PA)and chronic back conditions(CBCs)at the population level.We investigated the association between levels of total and type-specific PA participation and CBCs.Methods: The sample comprised 60,134 adults aged ≥16 years who participated in the Health Survey for England and Scottish Health Survey from 1994 to 2008.Multiple logistic regression models,adjusted for potential confounders,were used to examine the association between total and type-specific PA volume(walking,domestic activity,sport/exercise,cycling,football/rugby,running/jogging,manual work,and housework)and the prevalence of CBCs.Results: We found an inverse association between total PA volume and prevalence of CBCs. Compared with inactive participants, the fully adjusted odds ratio (OR) for very active participants (≥15 metabolic equivalent h/week) was 0.77 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-0.85).Participants reporting ≥300 min/week of moderate-intensity activity and ≥75 min/week of vigorous-intensity activity had 24%(95%CI:6%-39%)and 21%(95%CI:11%-30%)lower odds of CBCs,respectively.Higher odds of CBCs were observed for participation in high-level manual domestic activity (OR=1.22; 95%CI: 1.00-1.48). Sport/exercise was associated with CBCs in a less consistent manner(e.g.,OR=1.18(95%CI:1.06-1.32)for low levels and OR=0.82(95%CI:0.72-0.93)for high levels of sport/exercise).Conclusion:PA volume is inversely associated with the prevalence of CBCs.2095-2546/© 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.on behalf of Shanghai University of Sport.This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords: Activity;Chronic low back pain;Chronic musculoskeletal conditions;Epidemiology;Exercise
Chronic back conditions(CBCs)are common and impose a major burden on healthcare services. Low back pain(LBP), in particular, is one of the most common conditions encountered in clinical practice and remains a major health problem globally.1For example,in 2016,LBP was the leading cause of years lived with disability.2Moreover,the lifetime prevalence of LBP is reported to be as high as 84%worldwide3and between 58% and 62% in the UK.4-6In addition, the point prevalence of chronic pain in the UK is reported to be as high as 51%.7
CBCs encompass a range of complaints resulting in impairments that restrict people’s function. CBCs include back and neck pain, and other complaints affecting the back such as back trouble, curvature of the spine, disc trouble, lumbago,inflammation of the spinal joints,spondylitis,and spondylosis.LBP,for example,adversely affects individuals,their families,communities, and governments globally.8The economic burden of LBP is increasing and includes increasing days of absenteeism from work,loss of productivity,and cost of treatment.9In addition,the occurrence and chronicity of LBP have been associated with various individual, psychosocial, and occupational risk factors such as low education level, high levels of pain, depression, anxiety, physical limitations, and job dissatisfaction.10-12
The benefits of physical activity(PA)for improving overall health status are widely recognized. Although it is well-known that PA can help to decrease all-cause mortality and risk factors of a wide variety of other chronic diseases such as cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, obesity, and musculoskeletal diseases,13-17there is less evidence of the associations between PA and CBCs. Furthermore, even though clinical guidelines recommend that people with back pain should stay active,18the nature of the activity is rarely described and may not necessarily always be a prescription to be physically active.
Many previous studies have focused on measuring the association of PA with nonspecific and radiating back pain. However, there are conflicting results reported in these studies.Although some studies found no association between chronic LBP and engaging in different intensities of PA,19,20others reported that very low and very high levels of the PA(assessed by questionnaire) were associated with an increasing risk of chronic and radiating LBP(i.e.,a U-shaped relationship).21-23This apparent inconsistent relationship between PA and back pain described in previous studies may be due to the varying characteristics of PA(i.e.,type,intensity,and duration).Moreover, a previous systematic review concluded that the incidence of LBP is associated with the nature and intensity of PA and suggested that the type, intensity, and duration of the activity should be considered in measuring the association with LBP.24Furthermore, studies of older adults and those with multimorbidity are at particular risk of reverse causation,that is, the possibility that those with existing physical and medical comorbidities have a limited ability to engage in PA in the first place, and may have poorer health outcomes as a result of their chronic disease rather than their PA levels.25To account for this,the association between PA and CBCs will be examined in those without existing comorbidities and in analyses stratified by age,sex,and body mass index(BMI).
A review of the existing literature on the association between PA and back pain cannot provide a clear understanding of this relationship. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to examine the association between PA and the prevalence of CBCs in a large representative population sample of adults in the UK.The secondary objective was to examine the association between type-specific volume of PA(walking, domestic, sport/exercise, cycling, football/rugby,running/jogging,manual work and housework)and prevalence of CBCs. The research hypothesis is that PA volume is inversely associated with the prevalence of CBCs.
This study is based on a cross-sectional survey comprising participants of the Health Survey for England (HSE; 1994,1997-1999, 2003, 2004, 2006, and 2008) and Scottish Health Survey (SHS; 1995, 1998, and 2003). The surveys included adults aged ≥16 years.The HSE and SHS are household-based surveys that recruited a population sample with multistage,stratified probability sampling with postcode sectors selected at the first stage and household addresses selected at the second stage.The surveys have been described in detail elsewhere.26,27The current analyses included participants aged ≥16 years with valid data on all demographic,behavioral,and clinical variables of interest. All participants provided verbal informed consent before data collection. Ethics approvals for the various HSE and SHS surveys were granted by the North Thames Multicentre Research Ethics Committee for England, the Local Research Ethics Council in England,the Research Ethics Committee for all Area Health Boards in Scotland, and the Multicentre Research Ethics Committee for Scotland.
Information on CBCs in the survey was collected from 2 questions assessing long-term conditions. First, participants were asked whether they had any long-standing illness, disability, or infirmity. If they replied positively, they were then asked to report up to 6 long-standing illnesses. We defined CBCs as responses coded as back problems/slipped disc/spine/neck, which were derived from responses indicating the presence of back trouble, lower back problems, back ache/curvature of spine/damage,fracture or injury to back,spine or neck/disc trouble/lumbago, inflammation of spinal joint/prolapsed intervertebral discs/Scheuermann’s disease/spondylitis, spondylosis/worn discs in spine-affected legs. The responses were dichotomized into a yes/no variable,those who had CBCs and those who did not.
The PA and Sedentary Behaviour Assessment Questionnaire was used to assess the frequency(number of days in the past 4 weeks) and duration (of an average episode) of participation in 4 domains of PA:(1)light(e.g.,general tidying)and heavy (e.g., scrubbing floors) housework; (2) light and heavy manual work, gardening, and do-it-yourself activities; (3)walking; and (4) sport/exercise. Sport/exercise included cycling, running/jogging, swimming, ball sports, racquet sports,aerobics,dancing,and working out at a gym.The intensity of walking was determined by asking respondents whether their usual walking pace was slow/average (light intensity) or fairly brisk/fast (moderate intensity). Intensity of sport/exercise was determined by asking respondents whether the activity had made them out of breath or sweaty, and by the nature of the activity as indexed in the metabolic equivalent (MET)compendium.28The PA and Sedentary Behaviour Assessment Questionnaire has demonstrated acceptable convergent validity when compared against accelerometry in assessment of moderate and vigorous intensity PA in a large validation study where Spearman’s correlation coefficient was 0.38(95%confidence interval (CI): 0.32-0.45) in men and 0.40 (95%CI:0.36-0.48)in women.29
Participation in PA was then calculated in MET hours per week by multiplying the volume of activity (Frequency ×Duration)by the intensity of the activity in METs.29Three PA variables were derived for the main analyses: MET hours per week of total PA, and min/week of moderate- and vigorousintensity PA.Eight PA variables were derived for the secondary analyses: MET hours per week of walking, domestic PA(which consisted of housework as well as manual work,gardening and do-it-yourself activities), cycling, football/rugby, running/jogging, and sport/exercise excluding cycling,and minutes per week of manual work and housework activities. Because the PA and Sedentary Behaviour Assessment Questionnaire did not distinguish between recreational cycling and cycling for transport,we excluded cycling from the sport/exercise variable.
Total PA was categorized into groups framed around adherence to the current PA recommendations:(1)inactive(reporting no PA);(2)insufficiently active(reporting <7.5 MET h/week);(3) sufficiently active (reporting ≥7.5 and <15 MET h/week);and(4)very active(reporting ≥15 MET h/week).30
All other variables of PA were categorized into groups defined around tertiles: (a) none (defined as not participating in that type or level of activity),(b)low(defined as below the 25th percentile), (c) medium (defined as between the 25th and 75th percentiles), and (d) high (defined as above the 75th percentile). Previous studies have used this approach of categorization to distribute participants evenly into each category.31-33Moderate-intensity PA was categorized into the following groups: (a) none (not reporting any moderate intensity activity), (b) low (reporting <90 min/week), (c) medium(reporting ≥90 and <150 min/week), and (d) high (reporting≥150 and <300 min/week). We also included an additional group that reported ≥300 min/week to be in compliance with guidelines.34Vigorous-intensity PA was categorized into the following groups: (a) none (not reporting any vigorousintensity activity), (b) low (reporting <30 min/week), (c)medium (reporting ≥30 and <75 min/week), and (d) high(reporting ≥75 min/week).The categories for all other PA variables are displayed in Appendix Table 1.
Potential confounders were identified a priori from a review of current literature.10-12The following potential confounding variables were included in the analysis: age; sex; BMI underweight(<18.5 kg/m2),normal weight(18.5-24.9 kg/m2),overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m2), and obese (≥30.0 kg/m2); smoking status (current smoker, nonsmoker, and previous smoker); ethnicity(white,black,Asian(non-Chinese),and Chinese or other);education(higher education,further education(A level),no further education (O level/below), other (foreign/full-time students),and no education qualification);social occupational class(professional and managerial, manual, nonmanual, and other(Armed Forces)); employment status (full time and part time);psychological distress(General Health Questionnaire-12:0,1-3,and ≥4); cardiovascular disease; cancer; and musculoskeletal conditions (including arthritis/rheumatism/fibrositis and other problems of the bones/joints/muscles(not including CBCs)).
Multiple logistic regression analyses examined the association between PA and the prevalence of CBCs.The first model was adjusted for age and sex, and the second model was also adjusted for BMI, ethnicity, education level, smoking, social occupational class, psychological distress, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and musculoskeletal conditions, and was also mutually adjusted for the other PA types or intensity levels.A sensitivity analysis was carried out to exclude participants with cardiovascular disease (n=13,893), cancer (n=3545),and musculoskeletal conditions (n=6876).Because no appreciable differences were found,these participants were retained in all the analyses.
We also stratified the analysis of MET hours per week of total PA by age (<65 years old and ≥65 years old), sex (male and female), and BMI (overweight (≥25 and <30 kg/m2) and obese(≥30 kg/m2)).Considering that the total number of missing cases in each PA variable was <1% (except for moderateintensity PA,which was 2.3%)of the total sample,participants with missing data were excluded from the analyses.Odds ratios(OR) with 95%CIs were calculated. All analyses were conducted from December 2016 to March 2017 using SPSS statistics (Version 22.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). For all statistical tests,p <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The general characteristics of the included participants are presented in Table 1. The analysis included 60,134 participants,of which 3336(5.5%)reported CBCs.The mean age of the included participants was 45.7 ± 16.7 years and 50.6%were male, 85.2% were white, 39.0% were normal weight,49.6% had never smoked, 27.5% had a higher education,42.3%were manual workers,and 72.7%worked full time.
There was an inverse relationship between total PA volume and CBCs (Fig. 1). The fully adjusted OR was 0.89 (95%CI:0.79-0.99)for insufficiently active,0.81(95%CI:0.71-0.92)for sufficiently active, and 0.77 (95%CI: 0.69-0.85) for very active people, compared with those who were not active. We re-analyzed our data after excluding participants with cardiovascular disease, cancer, and musculoskeletal conditions, but no appreciable differences were found in the results(Appendix Tables 2 and 3).
In the stratified analysis by age,we found an inverse association between total PA and CBCs in participants <65 years old(Appendix Table 4).The fully adjusted OR was 0.71(95%CI:0.63-0.81)for insufficiently active,0.66(95%CI:0.58-0.76)for sufficiently active, and 0.60 (95%CI: 0.53-0.67) for very active participants,compared with those who were not active.However, we found no association between total PA and CBCs in participants aged ≥65 years.
Compared with male participants who were not active,male participants who were sufficiently and very active had a lower prevalence of CBCs (fully adjusted OR=0.82(95%CI: 0.68-0.98) and OR=0.77 (95%CI: 0.66-0.89),respectively; Appendix Table 5). We also found an inverse association between total PA and CBCs in female participants. The fully adjusted OR was 0.85 (95%CI: 0.72-1.00)for insufficiently active females, 0.80 (95%CI: 0.67-0.96)for sufficiently active females,and 0.77(95%CI:0.65-0.90)for very active females, compared with female participants who were not active.
Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of participants recruited from the Health Survey of England (1994, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2003, 2004, 2006, 2008) and Scottish Health Survey(1995,1998,2003).
Fig.1. Logistic regression for describing the association between total PA volume and prevalence of chronic back conditions. Model 1 is adjusted for age and sex; Model 2 is also adjusted for ethnicity, body mass index, smoking,education, occupation, employment status, psychological distress, cardiovascular disease,cancer,and musculoskeletal conditions(including arthritis/rheumatism/fibrositis and other problems of the bones/joints/muscles). Vertical lines represent 95%confidence intervals.Statistically significant at the level of p <0.05.MET=metabolic equivalent;PA=physical activity.
Compared with overweight participants who were inactive,overweight participants who were very active had a lower odds of CBCs(fully adjusted OR=0.77(95%CI:0.65-0.92);Appendix Table 6).We also found that obese participants who were sufficiently and very active had lower odds of CBCs(fully adjusted OR=0.64 (95%CI: 0.50-0.82) and 0.67(95%CI:0.55-0.83), respectively),compared with obese participants who were inactive.
Fig.2. Logistic regression for describing association between PA of moderateand vigorous-intensity and prevalence of chronic back conditions. Model 1 is adjusted for age and sex; Model 2 is also adjusted for ethnicity, body mass index, smoking, education, occupation, employment status, psychological distress,cardiovascular disease,cancer,and musculoskeletal conditions(including arthritis/rheumatism/fibrositis and other problems of the bones/joints/muscles)and all other PA levels (moderate and vigorous PA, mutually). Vertical lines represent 95% confidence intervals. Statistically significant at the level of p <0.05.PA=physical activity.
A very high level of moderate-intensity activity was associated with a lower odds of CBCs (fully adjusted OR=0.76(95%CI: 0.61-0.94)) compared with those who did not engage in any activity of moderate intensity(Fig.2A).
Vigorous intensity PA was inversely associated with CBCs(Fig.2B).The fully adjusted OR for a medium level of vigorous-intensity PA was 0.81(95%CI:0.69-0.94),and for a high level of vigorous-intensity PA it was 0.79 (95%CI:0.70-0.89) compared with those who did not engage in any vigorous-intensity activities.
Walking was inversely associated with the prevalence of CBCs when the analysis was adjusted for age and sex only(the OR was 0.89 (95%CI: 0.81-0.98) for a low level, 0.84(95%CI: 0.76-0.92) for a medium level, and 0.81 (95%CI:0.73-0.89)for a high level),compared with those who did not walk (Fig. 3A). However, these associations did not persist in the fully adjusted model.
Medium-level domestic activity was associated with lower odds of CBCs(fully adjusted OR=0.79(95%CI:0.71-0.87))compared with those who were not engaged in any domestic activity(Fig.3B).
Sport/exercise was associated with CBCs in a less consistent manner(Fig.3C).A high level of sport/exercise showed a lower odds of CBCs (fully adjusted OR=0.82 (95%CI:0.72-0.93)).Conversely,a low level of sport/exercise showed significantly higher odds of CBCs (fully adjusted OR=1.18(95%CI:1.06-1.32)).
Cycling was associated with a lower odds of CBCs in the age- and sex-adjusted model (OR for high level=0.79(95%CI: 0.64-0.98); Fig. 3D). However, no association was found following adjustment for potential confounders (fully adjusted OR=0.83(95%CI:0.67-1.02)).
Participation in football/rugby or running/jogging was inversely associated with CBCs (Appendix Table 7). The fully adjusted OR for participation in football/rugby was 0.67 (95%CI: 0.55-0.83) compared with those who did not participate in any football/rugby. The fully adjusted OR for participation in running/jogging was 0.67 (95%CI:0.55-0.81) compared with those who did not participate in any running/jogging.
Fig.3. Logistic regression for describing association between different types of PA(A,walking;B,domestic activity;C,sport/exercise;and D,cycling)and prevalence of chronic back conditions.Model 1 is adjusted for age and sex; Model 2 is also adjusted for ethnicity, body mass index, smoking,education, occupation,employment status,psychological distress,cardiovascular disease,cancer,and musculoskeletal conditions(including arthritis/rheumatism/fibrositis and other problems of the bones/joints/muscles)and mutually adjusted for all other PA types(walking,domestic,sport/exercise,and cycling).Vertical lines represent 95%confidence intervals.Statistically significant at the level of p <0.05.MET=metabolic equivalent;PA=physical activity.
A high level of manual work was associated with higher odds of CBCs (fully adjusted OR=1.22 (95%CI:1.00-1.48)) compared with those who did not engage any manual work activity (Appendix Table 8). Housework was associated with lower odds of CBCs in the age- and sexadjusted model (OR for a medium level=0.82 (95%CI:0.71-0.95) and OR for a high level=0.83 (95%CI:0.71-0.96)), but these associations did not persist in the fully adjusted model(Appendix Table 8).
The objective of this study was to examine the association between total and type-specific volume of PA and the prevalence of CBCs.We found an inverse association between total PA volume and the prevalence of CBCs.In general,adhering to the current PA recommendations was associated with approximately a 20% lower odds of reporting a CBC compared with those who were inactive.The results also showed that the reductions in CBCs of the greatest magnitude were observed in participants who were very active. Interestingly, participants who were insufficiently active (i.e., <7.5 MET h/week of total PA)still had a significantly lower prevalence of CBCs(11%).
Stratified analyses according to age,sex,and BMI showed a different trend.Several different patterns were observed in the groups, which suggest that specific groups might be better managed with PA modification. Overweight participants who were very active showed approximately a 23% lower odds of reporting CBCs, whereas obese participants who were sufficiently or very active showed approximately a 35% lower odds of reporting CBCs.There was also an inverse association between total PA and CBCs in participants <65 years old,but no association was found in those aged ≥65 years. Among male or female participants, the lower odds of CBCs (23%)were seen in those who were very active.
Multiple health guidelines30,34recommend increasing moderate-intensity PA over the minimum recommended level of 150 min/week to gain greater health benefits.In our study,only those achieving ≥300 min/week of moderate-intensity PA were associated with a lower prevalence of CBCs compared with those who did not engage in any moderate-intensity PA, suggesting a potential threshold effect. To the best of our knowledge, this is a novel finding that merits attention. Future prospective studies should investigate the possibility of a threshold effect for potentially beneficial associations between CBCs and levels of PA that are higher than the recommended minimum.
We also found that engaging in ≥30 min/week of vigorousintensity PA was associated with lower odds of reporting CBCs. Furthermore, engaging in ≥75 min/week in vigorousintensity PA was associated with 21%lower odds in reporting CBCs.These results concur with a previous prospective cohort study,35which found a significant association between increasing frequency of vigorous-intensity PA and decreasing prevalence of LBP in elderly people.
Despite the potential health benefits of walking,few studies have investigated its association with CBCs. Our study demonstrated that participating in any level of walking was associated with a lower odds of CBCs,compared with those who did not walk, only after adjusting for age and sex; and subjects who reported >8.9 MET h/week of walking were less likely to have CBCs than those who did not walk.A previous study has shown similar results in men, where walking for≥150 min/week was associated with lower odds of LBP only after adjusting for age and BMI.22
Medium domestic activity was associated with a decreased odds of CBCs.However,when we investigated the association of manual work and housework separately with CBCs, we found that a high level of manual work was associated with higher odds of CBCs,whereas low and medium levels of manual work and any level of housework were not associated with CBCs. The existing evidence investigating the association between domestic activity and back conditions is scant.24However,longitudinal data from the Canadian National Population Health Survey (1994-1997) demonstrated an inverse association between gardening/yard work and back pain in men.36In contrast,Huebscher et al.37found that heavy domestic activity (defined as being engaged in ≥2 h/week in vigorous gardening/yard work) was associated with an increased odds of having LBP. The results of these earlier studies may not be directly comparable with our study because we defined medium domestic activity as being engaged in >3.8 but <12.1 MET h/week of housework activities,manual work activities,gardening,and do-it-yourself activities.Therefore,a possible explanation for the inconsistencies between these studies is due to the differences in the definitions and classifications of domestic activities. Another explanation may be due to the small sample size included in the study by Huebscher et al.,37compared with our much larger sample size. Our sample size is more likely to have adequate variability in exposure and thus is more likely to detect associations when those exist.
In our study,sport/exercise included a wide range of exercises and noncompetitive sport. We found that participation in highlevel sport/exercise (≥15.4 MET h/week) was inversely associated with the presence of CBCs. Several cross-sectional studies have found an association between engaging in sport/exercise and prevalence of LBP. For example, Heneweer et al.21found that participation in sports was associated with a decreased odds of having chronic LBP. This finding was consistent with a 10-year prospective study that reported that participating in sport/exercise for ≥1 h/week was associated with a lower risk of chronic LBP.38Conversely,low levels of sport/exercise(<5 MET h/week)were associated with higher odds of CBCs. This finding is in accordance with a previous cohort study of the general population conducted in Norway, which demonstrated that people who engage in physical exercise <1 session per week(20 min/week)are more likely to develop LBP.39Therefore, based on these consistent results, sport/exercise could be recommended for the prevention or management of LBP.
Participation in football/rugby or running/jogging was associated with lower odds of CBCs in our study. High-level cycling(≥9 MET h/week)was associated with a lower odds of CBCs only after adjusting for age and sex.However,there are not many studies investigating the association of other specific types of activities,such as tennis and squash.Therefore,future studies should examine the associations between specific types of sport/exercise and back pain.They might also consider categorizing these types of activities into groups based on their loading on the back.21,40
Our results highlight the importance of determining the frequency, duration, intensity, and type of PA appropriate for the prevention or management of CBCs. However, the differing methods used in previous studies regarding the description and categorization of PA make a direct comparison between our study and previous work difficult. Moreover, our results highlight the importance of adjusting the statistical analysis for other PA types or levels that may be significantly associated with CBCs. These 2 important differences in methodology—categorizing PA and adjusting for other PA types or levels—may also explain some of the inconsistency between our findings and those of previous studies.
One strength of our study is that it included a large,pooled sample comprising a series of nationally representative samples of the populations from England and Scotland. The large population sample used in our analyses, which is more likely to have adequate variability in the exposure, made it more likely that we detected associations when those existed.Another important advantage of this very large sample size was that it allowed for stratified analyses by age,sex,and BMI in the association between total PA and CBCs. An additional strength of the study was that it adjusted for some comorbid factors (cardiovascular disease, cancer, and musculoskeletal conditions), which may have confounded the association of PA with CBCs.
There are some limitations to this study that should be considered. Only 5% of the sample reported having a CBC,which is lower than other prevalence estimates of LBP in British populations.4-6This finding may be attributed to the structure of the survey questions used to identify CBCs, in which participants were only questioned about CBCs if they first reported having a long-standing illness, disability, or infirmity. Owing to the cross-sectional design of this study,the relationships identified might be susceptible to the possibility of reverse causality (i.e., CBCs lead to reducing the activity level).41Another major limitation is the use of a selfreported PA questionnaire that might be subject to recall bias,which could result in an underestimation or overestimation of the activity level.42However, this limitation may be mitigated to some degree by the acceptable convergent validity demonstrated by the questionnaire when compared with accelerometry in assessment of moderate- and vigorousintensity PA in a representative sample. The final limitation that should be mentioned is the lack of control for occupational PA because of the limited availability of occupational PA data in the survey. However, we were able to adjust for social occupational class, which may be considered a proxy for occupational PA and may, therefore, account for the potential influence of the occupational PA on the association between PA and CBCs.
The results of this study showed that total PA was inversely associated with CBCs. Moderate- and vigorousintensity activities were associated with low odds of CBCs.In addition, medium domestic activity and participation in football/rugby or running/jogging were also inversely associated with CBCs. However, PA resulting from high-level manual work was associated with higher odds of CBCs.Sport/exercise was associated with CBCs in a less consistent manner; high-level sport/exercise was associated with low odds of CBCs, and low-level sport/exercise was associated with high odds of CBCs.Further research that includes a randomized clinical trial or that incorporates a longitudinal design with an inception cohort without LBP is required to confirm our results.
Acknowledgments
The Health Survey for England was funded by the English Department of Health/Health and Social Care Information Centre.The Scottish Health Survey was funded by the Scottish Executive.These funders had no role in the present study.The data presented here are available from the UK Data Archive(http://www.data-archive.ac.uk/findingData/hseTitles.asp).
This research did not receive any specific grant support from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. However, HA is supported by a Ph.D. scholarship from Taif University in Taif, Saudi Arabia. ES is funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council through a Senior Research Fellowship.
Author’s contributions
HA developed the study protocol, performed the statistical analyses under supervision of ES, had partial access to the data and took responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the results, drafted and revised the article, and contributed to the interpretation of the results; DS developed the study protocol, contributed to the interpretation of the results and revision of the article;SWMC performed the statistical analyses under supervision of ES, had partial access to the data and took responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the results; MM developed the study protocol, contributed to the interpretation of the results and revision of the article; ES developed the study protocol, assisted with the analysis and provided statistical expertise, had full access to the data and took responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the results,contributed to the interpretation of the results and revision of the article. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript, and agree with the order of presentation of the authors.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Supplementary materials
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2019.01.003.
Journal of Sport and Health Science2019年4期