Environment and Plant Protection Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
Since the implementation ofLong-termNationalScienceandTechnologyDevelopmentPlan(2006-2020), China’s financial investment in science and technology has increased rapidly, and the funding management of scientific research project has been constantly improved, to provide strong support for science and technology development. In terms of funding management for agricultural scientific research project, there are still some outstanding issues such as unreasonable project budget, chaotic expenditure and lack of effective supervision. Presently, the state has issuedNoticeonSeveralProvisionsaboutAdjustingtheSpecialFundingManagementApproachforNationalScienceandTechnologyProgramandNon-ProfitIndustryResearch,SeveralOpinionsoftheStateCouncilonImprovingandStrengtheningCentralFinancialResearchProjectandFundingManagement,andNoticeoftheStateCouncilonIssuingtheProgramforDeepeningtheReformoftheAdministrationofCentralFinanceScienceandTechnologyPlans. From project and funding management, the state makes a general plan and proposes a number of scientific and technological system reform initiatives aimed at regulating China’s scientific research projects and funding management, and creating good innovation atmosphere for scientific research. For the agricultural research institutions engaged in scientific research, there is a need to further regulate and strengthen scientific research funding management, and promote sustainable development of agricultural scientific research. Based on personal work practice, this paper studies the funding management for agricultural scientific research project in the new situation and makes personal recommendations.
2.1UnreasonablebudgetingThe agricultural scientific research project budgeting is the basic content of project implementation, and the relevant financial and scientific management departments need to participate in the formulation so as to achieve the scientific and accurate budgeting. However, in the actual budgeting, the project leaders and main participants are often responsible for the preparation work, while the financial and scientific research management departments rarely participate in the work. The budgeting personnel have strong subjective arbitrariness, affecting the rationality of the budget preparation. At the same time, due to long implementation period of agricultural research projects and climate influence, it has a great impact on the rationality of the budgeting. Due to irrational budgeting, the actual expenditure often greatly deviates from the budget during the final project acceptance.
2.2ChaoticexpenditureIn the project implementation pro-cess, the project leaders are arbitrary in applying for reimbursement and submit an expense account on some items which do not meet the requirements. In addition, many project leaders or research labs undertake different projects from many different sources at the same time, and the items are often not well distinguished and the reimbursement application is arbitrary, resulting in chaotic project expenditure.
2.3LackofeffectivesupervisiononuseoffundsMany departments develop the relevant funding management methods as well as relevant reimbursement management procedures, but in the actual operation, the use of project funds is mostly controlled by project leaders, and the approval process of relevant management departments, directors and legal person is often mere formality, never playing a real role in checking and auditing.
3.1ImprovingfundingmanagementsystemandmechanismforscientificresearchprojectThe management system characterized by "unified leadership, decentralized management and personal responsibility" should be implemented for the scientific research project funding. The legal person of unit assumes the leadership responsibility on scientific research funding management of the whole unit; the management departments of institute bear the responsibility of oversight and management; the research labs are responsible for the scrutiny and supervision on the scientific research funding use in the labs; the project leader is directly responsible for scientific research funding use, and bears legal liability on the reasonableness and authenticity of funding use; the financial management departments are responsible for financial management of research funding, accounting, assisting project leaders in project budgeting, and guiding project leaders to use scientific research funding according to the project task document or agreement, as well as relevant financial regulations; the asset management departments are responsible for the asset management stemming from scientific research funding; the commission for discipline inspection is responsible for supervision and management on the use of scientific research funding; the scientific research management departments assist with research funding management, auditing and supervision.
3.2MakingreasonablefundingbudgetforscientificresearchprojectThe financial and scientific research management departments should assist project leaders in scientifically, reasonably and truly making scientific research funding budget according to the characteristics and actual needs of research activities, the principles of policy compliance, economic rationality and objective relevance, and the requirements of project establishment unit. For the project involving government procurement, it is necessary to make government procurement budget in strict accordance with the relevant provisions of government procurement. For the key scientific research projects applying for financial support, it is necessary to organize the relevant functional departments, consultants or agencies to participate in budget review, and propose recommendations. The scientific research project funding budget includes all kinds of direct and indirect expenses in the course of project research, so it is necessary to make budget according to expenditure items and different sources of funds, and elaborate the main purposes and measuring basis of expenditure. The budget must be in accordance with the provisions of the funding authority or the fund provider. The direct funding budget is made by project applicants according to the characteristics of scientific research and the actual needs; the indirect funding budget is made according to the prescribed proportion or quota.
3.3StrictlymanagingscientificresearchprojectexpenditureResearch funding must be earmarked, and follow the principle of basing expenditure upon income. It is necessary to ensure that the scientific research funding is used for research projects and related research activities, in strict accordance with project management approach, or approved project budget, expenditure scope and standards. There is also a need to develop the relevant management system, to specify each expenditure item and determine the items that can not be listed in the content.
3.4StrengtheningsupervisionandinspectionThe unit sh-ould establish discipline inspection group responsible for supervising the use of research project funds, studying and proposing solutions to major issues in the process of supervision, and coordinating investigation on violations of discipline in the use of scientific research project funding.
[1] TAN CR. Study on the management of scientific research project funds in financial work[J]. Management Observer,2016(1):172-174.(in Chinese).
[2] REN JM. A brief discussion on the management problems and countermeasures of scientific research project funds of public service institution[J].Science-Technology Enterprise,2016(4):12,14.(in Chinese).
[3] WANG YL. Problems in the management of scientific research project funds and the control countermeasures[J]. Enterprise Reform and Management, 2016(8):146.(in Chinese).
[4] WANG M. Perfecting the internal control of scientific research project funds management, promoting the smooth implementation of research project[J]. Accounting Learning,2016(11):213-214.(in Chinese).
[5] LIU W. Discussion on the problems in the management of scientific research project funds and the solving measures[J]. Guide to Business,2016(11):29.(in Chinese).
[6] AN ZR. A brief discussion on the key management points of scientific research project funds[J]. Money China, 2016(13): 167. (in Chinese).
[7] ZHANG L. Exploration on the innovative financial management mode of research and development institution under the new situation[J]. Accounting Learning,2016(14):46、48.(in Chinese).
[8] LI YP. On the problems existing in the financial management of institution under the new situation and the countermeasures[J]. Management for Economy in Agricultural Scientific Research,2016(8):120-121,123.(in Chinese).
[9] XIE XL. Analysis on the countermeasures of fund management of research projects in institution[J].Money China,2014(17):143.(in Chinese).
Asian Agricultural Research2016年10期