Ron receptor-dependent gene regulation of Kupffer cells during endotoxemia

Rishikesh M Kulkarni, William D Stuart and Susan E Waltz

Cincinnati, USA

Ron receptor-dependent gene regulation of Kupffer cells during endotoxemia

Rishikesh M Kulkarni, William D Stuart and Susan E Waltz

Cincinnati, USA

BACKGROUND:Ron receptor tyrosine kinase signaling in macrophages, including Kupffer cells and alveolar macrophages, suppresses endotoxin-induced proinflammatory cytokine/ chemokine production. Further, we have also identified genes from Ron replete and Ron deplete livers that were differentially expressed during the progression of liver inflammation associated with acute liver failure in mice by microarray analyses. While important genes and signaling pathways have been identified downstream of Ron signaling during progression of inflammation by this approach, the precise role that Ron receptor plays in regulating the transcriptional landscape in macrophages, and particular in isolated Kupffer cells, has still not been investigated.

METHODS:Kupffer cells were isolated from wild-type (TK+/+) and Ron tyrosine kinase deficient (TK-/-) mice.Ex vivo, the cells were treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the presence or absence of the Ron ligand, hepatocyte growth factor-like protein (HGFL). Microarray and qRT-PCR analyses were utilized to identify alterations in gene expression between genotypes.

RESULTS:Microarray analyses identified genes expressed differentially in TK+/+ and TK-/- Kupffer cells basally as well as after HGfland LPS treatment. Interestingly, our studies identified Mefv, a gene that codes for the anti-inflammatory protein pyrin, as an HGFL-stimulated Ron-dependent gene. Moreover, lipocalin 2, a proinflammatory gene, which is induced by LPS, was significantly suppressed by HGfltreatment. Microarray results were validated by qRT-PCR studies on Kupffer cells treated with LPS and HGFL.

CONCLUSION:The studies herein suggest a novel mechanism whereby HGFL-induced Ron receptor activation promotesthe expression of anti-inflammatory genes while inhibiting genes involved in inflammation with a net effect of diminished inflammation in macrophages.

(Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2014;13:281-292)

Mst1R;

Mefv;

Lcn2;

Met receptor;

Kupffer cells;

macrophages

Introduction

Innate immune cells including macrophages play a vital role in the progression of a variety of inflammatory diseases including acute liver failure (ALF), inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, atherosclerosis and acute myocardial infarction which are a leading cause of mortality worldwide.[1,2]Under normal conditions, inflammatory cytokine and chemokine production by macrophages is minimal.[1]Studies have shown that macrophages are activated by inflammatory stimuli including bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in these disease states and that activated macrophages secrete proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines, including TNF-α, IL-1β, IL- 12p40, IL-6, Ccl-2 and Cxcl-2 in a Toll-like receptor (TLR) and NF-κB dependent manner to propagate the inflammatory response.[1,3]Attenuating innate immune system activation has been suggested as one of the potential therapies for inflammatory diseases.[1,2]However, the detailed molecular mechanisms of innate immune cell activation in these inflammatory diseases are not completely understood. In the present study, using the model of resident liver macrophages (Kupffer cells), we have elucidated mechanisms associated with macrophagemediated inflammation through microarray profiling.

The Ron receptor is a membrane spanning protein that belongs to the Met family of receptor tyrosine kinases. Ron is expressed on a variety of cell typesincluding epithelial cells and specialized macrophages such as osteoclasts, resident tissue macrophages (alveolar and peritoneal macrophages as well as Kupffer cells), but not on monocytes or circulating macrophages.[4]Ron expression in the liver starts at embryonic day 12.5 and immunohistochemical analyses have shown that Ron is expressed on embryonic as well as adult hepatocytes and Kupffer cells in both mouse and humans.[5,6]Hepatocyte growth factor-like protein (HGFL) is the only known ligand for Ron.[4]Binding of HGflto Ron receptor leads to activation of the receptor's intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity and binding of proteins containing the Src homology 2 and phosphotyrosine-binding domains. HGFL-stimulated Ron activation leads to the induction of diverse downstream signaling cascades, which play important roles in a variety of biological processes such as inflammation and cancer.[4]

HGFL-induced Ron receptor activation in peritoneal macrophages induces spreading, chemotaxis and phagocytosis.[7]Using mice that lack the tyrosine kinase (TK) signaling domain of the Ron receptor (TK-/-mice),[8]our prior studies have demonstrated that TK-/-mice have altered inflammatory responses compared to wild-type control (TK+/+) mice in various models of LPS-induced acute endotoxemia.[8-10]Specifically, we have shown Ron functions to limit the production of select proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines by attenuating LPS-induced NF-κB signaling.[11-13]

In the liver, the Ron receptor has been shown to suppress cytokine secretion from Kupffer cells and to inhibit hepatocyte survival in a murine model of liver inflammation, i.e. ALF.[13]Further, microarray analysis of total liver RNA isolated from TK+/+ and TK-/- mice in various stages of ALF identified gene expression patterns regulated by Ron.[14]While these studies were the first to note the consequences of Ron signaling during inflammatory liver disease progression, the genes that Ron regulates in specific liver cell types have not been investigated. Moreover, a major gap exists in our knowledge of the role of Ron in macrophage activation. The studies in this report utilized microarray analyses of Kupffer cells isolated from TK+/+ and TK-/-mice stimulated with LPS and/or HGFL. Our analysis identified Mefv as a downstream effector of Ron, which may serve to dampen macrophage activation. In addition, our data also pinpointed lipocalin 2 (Lcn2) as a proinflammatory gene that is induced upon Kupffer cell activation by LPS but negatively regulated by HGFL. In total, our analyses have identified several important downstream effectors of Ron signaling, which have not been previously linked. These Ron-regulated genes provide important mechanistic insights into the pathways that Ron utilizes to regulate macrophage activation and have critical implications in regulating inflammatory diseases including ALF.

Methods

Animals

Ron TK deficient mice (TK-/- mice) were generated as previously described and backcrossed into a C57BL/6 background.[8]All mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions and were treated and euthanized in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of University of Cincinnati.

Kupffer cell isolation, culture and treatment

Kupffer cells were isolated from mice between 8 to 14 weeks of age and were cultured as previously described.[15]Kupffer cells were either not treated or treated with bacterial LPS for 30 minutes or 1 hour (500 ng/mL) (E. coliserotype 0111:B4; Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Kupffer cells were also treated with HGfl(R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN) at 200 ng/mL for 1 hour or HGflovernight (16-18 hours) followed by LPS stimulation for 30 minutes.

RNA isolation and microarray analysis

Kupffer cells isolated from 2-3 separate livers were pooled together and from each pooled isolation, experiments were subsequently performed in duplicate. RNA was independently isolated from each duplicate and pooled in equal concentrations to represent one microarray (one lane of the heat map). A second microarray was performed as noted and results from two microarrays for each treatment are compared in this report. As such, each condition is representative of 4-6 Kupffer cell isolations and quadruplicate experiments. Total RNA was isolated from Kupffer cells using TriZol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) as previously described.[13,14]Isolated RNA was purified by sodium acetate precipitation and purified RNA was examined at the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Affymetrix Core. RNA quality was assessed and quantified using an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). RNA was amplified using the WT-Ovation Pico System (NuGen, San Carlos, CA) and subjected to hybridization to the Mouse Gene 1.0 ST GeneChip array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). The probe arrays were scanned using the Affymetrix GeneChip Scanner 3000 and GeneChip Operating Software 1v4 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA).

Microarray data analysis

Gene expression changes from the microarray signals were determined using GeneSpring software (Silicon Genetics, Redwood City, CA). Gene lists from the microarray data were obtained based on a 1.5-foldexpression difference using the Welchttest and twotailed Student'sttest with Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate withP≤0.01. Correlation of gene expression with numeric parameters was assessed using the Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient test withPvalue. Lists were filtered based on fold change andPvalue. Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired two-tailed Welchttest or the Mann-WhitneyUtest with Bonferroni's correction. 935 genes were obtained and they were changed globally in all the groups comparing them to the TK+/+ untreated sample. Further analysis yielded treatment-specific comparisons as needed between the groups. Clustered image maps for specific comparison groups were obtained using the CIMMiner program.[16]Gene lists generated for the specific treatment groups were uploaded on to the web-based PANTHER (Protein ANalysis THrough Evolutionary Relationships) classification system software and functional annotation analyses were performed.[17]

Quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA isolated from Kupffer cells after specified treatments was subjected to cDNA synthesis using the high capacity RNA to cDNA kit according to manufacturer's instructions (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). qRT-PCR was performed on diluted cDNA using FastStart SYBR Green Master (Roche, Nutley, NJ). The genes analyzed and their corresponding primer sets are as follows: Egr-1 (5'-TCT TGG TGC CTT TTG TGT GAC-3'; 5'-CTC TTC CTC GTT TTT GCT CTC-3'), IL-6 (5'-TAG TCC TTC CTA CCC CAA TTT CC-3'; 5'-TTG GTC CTT AGC CAC TCC TTC-3'), Tnf-α (5'-CAT CTT CTC AAA ATT CGA GTG ACA A-3'; 5'-TGG GAG TAG ACA AGG TAC AAC CC-3'), Mevf (5'-TCA TCT GCT AAA CAC CCT GGA-3'; 5'-GGG ATC TTA GAG TGG CCC TTC-3'), Lcn2 (5'-TGG CCC TGA GTG TCA TGT G-3'; 5'-CTC TTG TAG CTC ATA GAT GGT GC-3') and β-glucuronidase (GusB) (5'-TTG AGA ACT GGT ATA AGA CGC ATC AG-3'; 5'-TCT GGT ACT CCT CAC TGA ACA TGC-3'). Expression levels were normalized to GusB as an internal control and relative gene expression results were reported in graphs. qRT-PCR analyses were performed at least twice with Kupffer cells pooled from two mice per isolation.

Cytokine array

Conditioned media from Kupffer cells was collected basally (untreated) or following 30 minutes of LPS treatment or HGflovernight pretreatment followed by 30 minutes of LPS treatment. Secreted cytokines were identified utilizing the mouse cytokine array panel A (R&D Systems) as described.[13]

Western blotting analyses

Western blotting analyses were performed on isolated Kupffer cells as described previously.[13]The primary antibodies were Lcn2 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), and actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX).

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance for qRT-PCR and cytokine array was defined asP＜0.05 and determined by Student'sttest. Error bars represent SEM.

Results

Microarray analyses of Ron proficient and Ron deficient Kupffer cells

We have previously shown that the Ron receptor TK is expressed on resident tissue macrophages including alveolar macrophages and Kupffer cells and that upon activation by its ligand, HGFL, the Ron receptor diminishes the expression and secretion of select proinflammatory cytokines induced by LPS exposure.[12,13]However, a major gap exists in our knowledge of the genes that Ron modulates during macrophage activation. To elucidate the precise role that the Ron receptor plays in regulating the transcriptional landscape in macrophages, Kupffer cells were isolated from wild-type (TK+/+) and Ron TK deficient (TK-/-) mice and gene expression profiles were examinedex vivoin response to LPS, HGfland the combination of LPS and HGFL. Following the treatment, Kupffer cell RNA was isolated and subjected to microarray analysis. In an analysis of the data, 935 genes were identified to be significantly altered compared to the untreated TK+/+ Kupffer cells (Fig. 1).

Basal gene expression changes between Ron proficient and Ron deficient Kupffer cells

Further data mining identified 24 genes that were differentially regulated between TK+/+ and TK-/-Kupffer cells basally, of which 9 genes were induced in TK-/- Kupffer cells while 15 genes were suppressed in TK-/- cells (Fig. 2A). The web-based PANTHER[17]gene function-organizing tool allowed grouping of these basally regulated genes into 13 overlapping biological process categories that included cellular processes, cell cycle, immune system processes and metabolic processes(Fig. 2A). The genes that were basally upregulated in the TK-/- Kupffer cells included proinflammatory genes such as Itgax (Cd11c), Ccrl2, Ccl22 and Tnfsf9 (Cd137l). A number of anti-inflammatory genes, including IL-10, were decreased in untreated TK-/- Kupffer cells compared with TK+/+ cells. Thus, absence of a functional Ron receptor in Kupffer cells predisposes these cells to a proinflammatory phenotype by increasing the expression of select proinflammatory genes while decreasing the expression of anti-inflammatory genes.

LPS-responsive genes in Kupffer cells

In an analysis of LPS responsiveness, 43 genes in TK+/+ Kupffer cells were identified to be differentially regulated by LPS compared with unstimulated TK+/+ Kupffer cells. Thirty-six of these genes were induced after LPS treatment while 7 genes were suppressed. The PANTHER gene function-organizing tool allowed grouping of these genes into 13 overlapping biological process categories that included apoptosis, cell communication, cellular processes, cell cycle, developmental processes, immune system processes, metabolic processes and stimulus response (Fig. 2B). Similarly, LPS treatment of TK-/- Kupffer cells altered the gene expression profiles of 56 genes, of which 41 genes were induced after LPS treatment while 15 genes were suppressed, compared with unstimulated TK-/- Kupffer cells. These genes were grouped into 11 overlapping biological process categories that included apoptosis, cell communication, cell cycle, cellular processes, developmental processes, immune system processes, metabolic processes and stimulus response (Fig. 2C). Our data also supported the induction of a standard "LPS-signature" as shown by previous studies[3,18,19]and this included increases in Tnf-α, Cxcl10, Ccl4, Egr-1, Il6, Socs3, Fos, Jun in TK+/+ as well as TK-/- Kupffer cells after LPS treatment. Similarly, the zinc finger proteins Znf760 and Zbtb1 as well as the phosphodiesterase enzyme Pde3b were suppressed in both genotypes after LPS treatment.[19]

Fig. 1.Global changes in gene expression in TK+/+ Kupffer cells compared to TK-/- cells prior to and after treatment with HGfland LPS. TK+/+ and TK-/- Kupffer cells were untreated (-) or treated with LPS for 30 minutes, HGfl60 minutes, or overnight HGflfollowed by 30 minutes LPS in duplicate. RNA was isolated and subjected to microarray analysis. 935 genes were identified which changed significantly over untreated TK+/+ control RNA and are depicted in the heat map.

HGflresponsive genes in Ron expressing Kupffer cells

Fig. 2.Gene expression changes in Kupffer cells after LPS and HGfltreatments.A: Heat map of 24 genes differentially expressed between TK+/+ and TK-/- Kupffer cells in the absence of treatment (basal changes).B: Heat map of 43 genes differentially expressed in TK+/+ Kupffer cells after LPS treatment for 30 minutes.C: Heat map of 56 genes differentially expressed in TK-/- Kupffer cells after LPS treatment for 30 minutes.D: Heat map of 13 genes differentially expressed in TK+/+ Kupffer cells after HGfltreatment for 1 hour. Gene ontology function of the web-based program, PANTHER, was used to classify the genes that were upregulated or down regulated basally or after each treatment into different biological processes categories (A-D).

HGfltreatment of TK+/+ Kupffer cells altered the expression of 13 genes, of which 12 genes were induced while 1 gene was suppressed. These 13 genes were grouped into 8 overlapping biological process categories that included apoptosis, cell communication, cellular processes, immune system processes, metabolic processes and stimulus response (Fig. 2D). Genes induced by HGfltreatment included the proinflammatory genesTnf-α and IL-6 as well as anti-inflammatory genes such as Mefv and Tnfaip3 (A20). The only gene that was suppressed in TK+/+ Kupffer cells after HGfltreatment was the inflammation modulator gene Lcn2. Lcn2 has been shown to be both proinflammatory as well as anti-inflammatory in a cell and context dependent manner.[20,21]Thus, HGflstimulation may initiate an anti-inflammatory response in Kupffer cells by altering the expression of anti-inflammatory genes as well as proinflammatory genes.

Differential gene expression changes between LPS-treated Ron proficient and Ron deficient Kupffer cells

The gene sets from LPS treated TK+/+ and TK-/-Kupffer cells were further examined to identify genes that were differentially regulated between the genotypes in response to LPS exposure. Three identified gene sets included (i) LPS-induced genes in TK+/+ Kupffer cells (36 genes); (ii) LPS-induced genes in TK-/- Kupffer cells (41 genes); and (iii) genes differentially regulated by LPS in TK-/- versus TK+/+ Kupffer cells (16 genes). Of the 36 genes LPS-induced in TK+/+ and 41 in TK-/-Kupffer cells after LPS treatment (Fig. 2), 33 genes were similar in both the genotypes, while 3 genes (Fat3, JunB, 2310016C08Rik) were uniquely induced in TK+/+ Kupffer cells and 4 genes (Hist1h4c, Osm, AY078069, Prdm1) were uniquely induced in TK-/-Kupffer cells after LPS treatment (Fig. 3A). Ten genes were also identified that were suppressed in TK+/+ Kupffer cells but induced in TK-/- Kupffer cells after LPS treatment. These genes included Fryl, Lypla2, Bcl2l1, LOC100042747, Tnfsf18, Saps1, LOC626000, Adpgk, Bak1 and Stx16 (Fig. 3A).

Similar studies were conducted with genes suppressed after LPS treatment. Three identified gene sets included (i) LPS-suppressed genes in TK+/+ Kupffer cells (7 genes); (ii) LPS-suppressed genes in TK-/-Kupffer cells (15 genes); and (iii) genes differentially regulated by LPS in TK-/- versus TK+/+ Kupffer cells (16 genes). Of the 7 genes suppressed in TK+/+ Kupffer cells and 15 in TK-/- Kupffer cells (Fig. 2), 2 genes were the same in both genotypes, while 5 genes (Fryl, 5430411C19Rik, LOC100042747, Stx16 and Gas5) were uniquely suppressed in TK+/+ Kupffer cells and 10 genes (Zfp422-rs1, 2700094F01Rik, Zbtb1, Yars2, Eif2c4, Pigp, Zfp87, LOC667203, Zfp672 and Guf1) were uniquely suppressed in TK-/- Kupffer cells after LPS treatment (Fig. 3B). Ten unique genes were also identified to be induced in TK+/+ Kupffer cells but suppressed in TK-/-Kupffer cells after LPS treatment. These genes included Tmem101, Gstm5, Fat3, Med31, Hmcn1, Spaca1, Lsm8, Rpl22l1, LOC668919 and Lcn2.

Differential gene expression changes in Ron proficient Kupffer cells after LPS and HGfltreatment

The gene sets from LPS treated and HGflplus LPS treated TK+/+ Kupffer cells were further analyzed to examine genes differentially regulated between treatments (Fig. 3C). Of the genes induced by LPS, 5 genes were suppressed by the combination of HGfland LPS treatment and included the proinflammatory genes Cxcl10, IL-6 and Ccl4. The data were in agreement with our prior studies whereby Ron activation suppressed proinflammatory gene expression in macrophages, including Kupffer cells.[12,13]The other 2 genes were Fat3 and Gbp5. There were 7 genes (A530040E14Rik, Fcgr4, Spryd4, Lsm8, Rpl22l1, C4b and Lcn2) that were suppressed after HGfland LPS co-treatment. Three genes (Mefv, Itgax and Mbc2) were induced with HGflplus LPS treatment. Mefv, an anti-inflammatory protein, was also induced after HGfltreatment alone in TK+/+ Kupffer cells. Fryl was induced by combined HGfland LPS treatment but was suppressed by LPS alone. These microarray studies are consistent with prior studies, which have documented HGFL-induced Ron activation as a suppressor of LPS-mediated inflammation.[12,13]

Validation of microarray data

qRT-PCR was used to validate the microarray data (Fig. 4). EGR-1, a LPS-induced transcription factor,[13]was dramatically upregulated after LPS treatment of both TK+/+ and TK-/- Kupffer cells, 3-fold and 4-fold respectively, in the microarray. qRT-PCR analysis on TK+/+ and TK-/- Kupffer cells showed that EGR-1 mRNA was induced in both genotypes after LPS exposure (Fig. 4A). Similarly, IL-6, an LPS-induced cytokine, was induced 2.57-fold and 1.73-fold in LPS-treated TK+/+ and TK-/- Kupffer cells, respectively, in the microarray. qRT-PCR analyses showed an induction of IL-6 in TK+/+ and TK-/- Kupffer cells (Fig. 4B). HGFL-induced expression of cytokines such as IL-6 (1.66-fold) and TNF-α (2.62-fold) in the microarray. qRT-PCR analysis showed IL-6 and TNF-α induced 3.01-fold and 2.91-fold respectively after HGfltreatment (Fig. 4C). Microarray analysis also demonstrated an upregulation of LPS-induced IL-6 mRNA (2.57-fold), which was then diminished by HGfland LPS dual treatment in TK+/+ Kupffer cells. qRT-PCR analysis showed an increase in IL-6 mRNA by LPS, which was diminished after HGflplus LPS treatment (Fig. 4D). Microarray analyses found that IL-10 was suppressed in TK-/- Kupffer cells (0.64-fold) compared with TK+/+ Kupffer cells basally and that LPS induced IL-10 expression in Kupffer cells from both the genotypes (5.20-fold in TK+/+ Kupffercells and 8.41-fold in TK-/- Kupffer cells). Similarly, Cxcl10 mRNA was induced 5.03-fold in TK+/+ Kupffer cells and 6.51-fold in TK-/- Kupffer cells after LPS treatment, while Ccl4 mRNA was induced 2.86-fold in TK+/+ Kupffer cells and 2.29-fold in TK-/- Kupffer cells after LPS treatment. As further validation of the microarray data, cytokine array analyses were performed on conditioned media from cultured Kupffer cells. Asdepicted in Fig. 4E and F, no significant differences were observed in the secreted protein levels of IL-10 and Cxcl10 basally between genotypes. However, Ccl4 protein production was significantly higher in TK+/+ versus TK-/- Kupffer cells (Fig. 4E). After LPS treatment, IL-10, Cxcl10 and Ccl4 proteins were secreted by TK+/+ and TK-/- Kupffer cells and were 2.01-fold, 1.75-fold and 1.34-fold higher in the TK-/- conditioned media compared with TK+/+ conditioned media (Fig. 4F).

Fig. 3.Differential gene expression in Kupffer cells with LPS and HGfltreatment.A: Venn diagram representing genes induced after LPS treatment in TK-/- compared to TK+/+ Kupffer cells. Ten unique genes were induced in TK-/- but suppressed in TK+/+ Kupffer cells after LPS treatment.B: Venn diagram representing genes suppressed after LPS treatment in TK-/- compared to TK+/+ Kupffer cells. Analyses identified 13 unique genes that were suppressed in TK-/- Kupffer cells but were induced in TK+/+ cells after LPS treatment.C: Venn diagram representing genes changed in TK+/+ Kupffer cells after LPS and/or HGfltreatment. Three unique genes were induced in Kupffer cells after dual treatment. Five genes induced by LPS were suppressed by HGfland one gene, which was suppressed by LPS treatment, was induced after HGfland LPS treatment. Seven unique genes were suppressed by HGfland LPS treatment. The biological processes categories are noted for the differential treatment groups (AandB).

Identification of Mefv (pyrin) and Lcn2 as novel downstream effectors of HGFL-induced Ron activation

Microarray analyses also documented an HGFL-dependent regulation of Kupffer cell genes including Mefv (pyrin), which was also consistently induced in TK+/+ Kupffer cells by qRT-PCR after HGfltreatment (Fig. 5A). qRT-PCR for Lcn2 demonstrated an upregulation after LPS treatment, which was then diminished by HGfland LPS dual treatment (Fig. 5B). Similarly, protein levels of Lcn2 also showed an LPS- mediated induction, which was diminished by HGfland LPS dual treatment in TK+/+ Kupffer cells (Fig. 5C). Further, to test the effect of HGFL-mediated Ron activation on NLRP3 inflammasome activity, IL- 1β protein levels secreted by TK+/+ Kupffer cells after LPS and LPS-HGfltreatment were measured. IL-1βsecreted protein levels were significantly diminished by HGfland LPS dual treatment compared with LPS treatment alone in TK+/+ Kupffer cells (Fig. 5D). Our data showed two novel downstream effectors of Ron signaling. We found that HGFL-induced Ron activation in Kupffer cells induces Mefv (pyrin) and diminishes Lcn2 expression, which may promote the expression of anti-inflammatory genes while inhibiting genes involved in inflammation.

Fig. 4.A: Validation of microarray data. qRT-PCR analyses on TK+/+ and TK-/- Kupffer cells showed EGR-1 mRNA was induced 1.8-fold more in the TK-/- compared to TK+/+ Kupffer cells after 30 minutes of LPS treatment.B: IL-6 mRNA was induced 2.1-fold more in the TK+/+ compared to TK-/- Kupffer cells after LPS treatment.C: qRT-PCR analyses showed that HGfltreatment for 1 hour modestly increased IL-6 (3.01-fold) and TNF-α (2.91-fold) mRNA levels.D: LPS induced IL-6 (6.67-fold) mRNA levels were suppressed by overnight HGfltreatment followed by LPS treatment (3.31-fold). Cytokine array of conditioned media from TK+/+ and TK-/- Kupffer cells showing basal (E) and LPS-stimulated cytokine protein levels (F). *:P＜0.05.

Fig. 5.HGfltreatment induces Mefv (pyrin) and suppresses Lcn2 in TK+/+ Kupffer cells. RNA from Kupffer cells was obtained after HGfland LPS treatment. qRT-PCR for Mefv (pyrin) (A) and Lcn2 (B) were performed under various treatment conditions. Western blotting for Lcn2 protein expression in TK+/+ Kupffer cells after various treatment conditions (C). Secreted levels of IL-1β in conditioned media from TK+/+ Kupffer cells after various treatment conditions (D). *:P＜0.05.

Discussion

In the present study, we identified the gene expression profiles of TK+/+ and TK-/- Kupffer cells under basal conditions, after exposure to LPS and after Ron activation by its ligand HGFL. This study is the first to identify Ron receptor-induced genes in primary macrophages. We identified genes that were basally different between TK+/+ and TK-/- Kupffer cells and these genes included receptors, cytokines and inflammation modulators. LPS treatment of TK+/+ and TK-/- Kupffer cells induced the "LPS-signature" genes,[3,18,19]which included Tnf-α, Cxcl10, Ccl4, Egr-1, Il6, Socs3, Fos and Jun. Further, we identified genes differentially regulated between TK+/+ and TK-/- Kupffer cells after LPS treatment. This gene pool included genes that were uniquely regulated in a genotype-specific fashion, as well as genes that were regulated in a similar direction after LPS treatment. HGFL-induced genes were also identified in TK+/+ Kupffer cells and included cytokines, receptors and inflammatory modulators. Our analyses also identified pyrin as a novel downstream effector of the Ron receptor to diminish LPS-induced inflammation. We have shown that LPS treatment of macrophages, including Kupffer cells, induces the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines and that this secretion is diminished with HGFL.[11,13]Further, our previous data also demonstrated that this inhibition is associated with diminished activation of NF-κB signaling.[11,13]The exact molecular mechanisms by which the Ron receptor inhibits NF-κB activation in macrophages are still not well understood. In the present study, we have identified Mefv (pyrin) as a gene downstream of HGFL-induced Ron activation in Kupffer cells, both by microarray as well as by qRT-PCR. Mefv (pyrin) mRNA was induced upon HGfltreatment of Kupffer cells and remained high through overnight treatment (Fig. 5 and data not shown). Mefv gene encodes the protein called pyrin, which is an anti-inflammatory protein and inhibits NF-κB activation.[22]Mutations in the Mefv gene have been found to be associated with many auto-inflammatory diseases including familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) and Crohn's disease, which are characterized by exaggerated inflammation.[22,23]A study[24]has shown that pyrin inhibits the processing and assembly of NLRP3 inflammasome that promotes IL-1β secretion. IL-1β is a potent proinflammatory cytokine and is partly responsible for the inflammatory phenotype seen in FMF patients.[23,24]The mutant forms of pyrin observed in Crohn's disease and FMF patients do not interact properly with their binding partners, which leads to the assembly of IL-1β inflammasomes and hyper-inflammation.[23]Moreover, mice expressing a pyrin mutant associated with FMF displayed hyperinflammation upon LPS-induced endotoxemia compared with controls animals.[24]Further, IL-1β secreted protein levels were significantly diminished by HGfland LPS dual treatment compared with LPS treatment alone in TK+/+ Kupffer cells, suggesting a defect in inflammasome assembly in TK+/+ Kupffer cells upon Ron activation. Our studies suggest that pyrin is a novel downstream target of Ron receptor activation, which may play an important role in dampening the LPS-NF-κB-induced proinflammatory response of Kupffer cells.

Very little is known about the transcriptional control of Mefv gene expression. A prior study[23]has identified a minimal promoter element as well as an enhancer region in the 5' region of the Mefv gene. This region has binding sites for transcription factors that play a role in myeloid cell-specific cytokine gene expression and include c-myb, PU1, NF-κB, C/EBP and AML.[23]Although we have previously shown that Ron activation by HGflinduces NF-κB signaling in various cancers of epithelial origin,[4]we did not observe NF-κB activation (detected by phosphorylation of NF-κB) in Kupffer cells after Ron activation by HGfl(data not shown). Thus far, there have been no reports of Ron activation and initiation of c-myb, PU1, C/EBP and AML-dependent transcription and the mechanisms by which pyrin is induced downstream of Ron activation in macrophages are still not known.

Lcn2 is an iron-trafficking protein, expressed on various cell types such as epithelial cells and macrophages. Lcn2 binds iron siderophores and limits ferric iron uptake by bacteria, resulting in diminished bacterial infection.[25]Recent studies[20,21,26-28]have identified both pro- and anti-inflammatory roles for Lcn2. Lcn2 expression is induced in tissue resident macrophages including Kupffer cells and alveolar macrophages after LPS treatment in vivo in an NF-κB dependent manner.[26]Lcn2 has been shown to downregulate the inflammatory response and to protect the lung and liver from excessive damage induced byLPS. Lcn2 also binds and/or sequesters chemokines, thereby reducing their biological activity and helps to diminish inflammation.[26]Conversely, Lcn2 has been shown to be associated with various inflammatory states such as obesity and inflammatory bowel disease. A study[29]has shown increased expression of this protein in various murine models of inflammatory bowel disease, especially colitis. Further, Lcn2 expression is also increased in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, specifically ulcerative colitis patients.[29]Studies[27,28]using Lcn2 null mice shed a light on understanding the role of this protein in inflammation. Lcn2 null mice showed lower inflammation and reduced tissue regeneration in models of spinal cord injury and ischemic reperfusion injury. Lcn2 null mice had diminished tissue infiltration of immune cells as well as decreased expression of proinflammatory cytokines including MIP-1α, MCP-1, IL-1β and TNF-α in these studies.[27,28]Thus, the majority of the data suggest that Lcn2 has a predominantly proinflammatory role. Accordingly, our data show that LPS induces Lcn2 expression in TK+/+ Kupffer cells and that HGflis able to diminish the induction.

Microarray and qRT-PCR analyses demonstrated that a number of proinflammatory cytokines including IL-6 and TNF-α were moderately induced in Kupffer cells following Ron activation by HGFL. These levels were not as high as those observed in cells stimulated with LPS and were down to basal levels by 6 hours after HGfltreatment (data not shown). We have observed similar results in alveolar macrophages (data not shown). Further, it was shown that megakaryocytes express the Ron receptor and that activation of Ron on these cells by HGflinduces IL-6 production that helps in the maturation of megakaryocytes.[30]Although HGFL-induced Ron activation diminishes LPS-induced increases in inflammatory cytokine secretion by macrophages,[11,13]the significance of moderate induction of the proinflammatory cytokines immediately after Ron activation is not known. IL-6 has been shown to act as an anti-inflammatory protein as well, especially during the acute phase response to inflammation by diminishing the levels of proinflammatory cytokines and increasing expression of anti-inflammatory proteins including IL-1Ra.[31]It may be possible that IL-6 induced by HGflmay actually act as an anti-inflammatory protein.

Based on our studies, we propose a working model by which the Ron receptor is able to suppress LPS-induced inflammation in Kupffer cells (Fig. 6). We show that Ron activation in TK+/+ Kupffer cells induces pyrin (Mefv) expression by yet unknown mechanisms. Previously we found that Ron activation in macrophages diminishes LPS-induced NF-κB activation and induction of its downstream target genes.[11,13]Pyrin, as described in earlier reports,[22-24]may act as an antiinflammatory protein in Kupffer cells by diminishing NF-κB activation as well as inflammasome assembly downstream of LPS-induced Kupffer cell activation. Further, HGFL-induced Ron signaling may inhibit Lcn2 (a proinflammatory protein) induction by LPS, which may further reduce Kupffer cell associated proinflammatory cytokine production as well as decrease immune cell infiltration to the area of injury.

Fig. 6.Working model. Based on our data, we propose a role for pyrin as a downstream mediator of Ron signaling in inhibiting LPS-induced NF-κB mediated inflammation in Kupffer cells. Further, we propose that Ron signaling inhibits Lcn2 expression, which may act through multiple mechanisms to regulate inflammation.

Some inflammatory liver diseases such as chronic hepatitis C infection are characterized by increased urinary excretion of Lcn2.[32]Unfortunately, the role of Ron receptor as well as pyrin, in hepatitis or other liver inflammatory diseases in humans is not known and needs further characterization. The negative regulation of LPS-induced inflammation by the Ron receptor in macrophages has opened avenues for the development of pharmacological modulators of the pathway. The present study has gone a step further and identified the HGFL-Ron regulated genes in Kupffer cells as well as the differential gene expression profile in TK+/+ and TK-/- Kupffer cells after endotoxin exposure. The novel signaling mechanisms downstream of the Ronreceptor are active in alveolar macrophage cell line MHS (data not shown) and may be active in other macrophages as well. These novel signaling pathways may be targets for therapeutic interventions in various macrophage-associated inflammatory diseases where the proper control of innate immune responses are critical. It has been suggested that targeting drugs and peptides specifically to Kupffer cells by liposomal and nanoparticle mediated drug delivery to decrease the secretion of proinflammatory mediators is one of the ways to limit the progression of inflammation in liver diseases.[33]Based on this notion, it may be possible to develop molecular-targeted therapy to activate the Ron receptor by delivering its ligand HGFL, in its processed and active heterodimeric form, by liposomes or nanoparticles to Kupffer cells, which will help limit Kupffer cell mediated secretion of proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines and thus limit liver inflammation.

Acknowledgement:The authors thank Nancy M Benight, PhD, for critical review of the manuscript.

Contributors:WSE proposed the study. KRM and WSE performed research and wrote the first draft. KRM and SWD collected and analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the design and interpretation of the study and to further drafts. WSE is the guarantor.

Funding:This work was supported in part by grants from the Public Health Services Grants CA125379 and NIH P30 DK078392 from the National Institutes of Health, Veteran's Administration VA1001BX000803, and 12POST12040055 from the American Heart Association Great Rivers Affiliate.

Ethical approval:All mice were treated and euthanized in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of University of Cincinnati.

Competing interest:No benefits in any form have been received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

1 Dennert R, van Paassen P, Wolffs P, Bruggeman C, Velthuis S, Felix S, et al. Differences in virus prevalence and load in the hearts of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy with and without immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2012;19:1182-1187.

2 Hansson GK, Hermansson A. The immune system in atherosclerosis. Nat Immunol 2011;12:204-212.

3 Björkbacka H, Fitzgerald KA, Huet F, Li X, Gregory JA, Lee MA, et al. The induction of macrophage gene expression by LPS predominantly utilizes Myd88-independent signaling cascades. Physiol Genomics 2004;19:319-330.

4 Wagh PK, Peace BE, Waltz SE. Met-related receptor tyrosine kinase Ron in tumor growth and metastasis. Adv Cancer Res 2008;100:1-33.

5 Okino T, Egami H, Ohmachi H, Takai E, Tamori Y, Nakagawa A, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of distribution of RON receptor tyrosine kinase in human digestive organs. Dig Dis Sci 2001;46:424-429.

6 Quantin B, Schuhbaur B, Gesnel MC, Doll'e P, Breathnach R. Restricted expression of the ron gene encoding the macrophage stimulating protein receptor during mouse development. Dev Dyn 1995;204:383-390.

7 Leonard EJ, Skeel AH. Enhancement of spreading, phagocytosis and chemotaxis by macrophage stimulating protein (MSP). Adv Exp Med Biol 1979;121B:181-194.

8 Waltz SE, Eaton L, Toney-Earley K, Hess KA, Peace BE, Ihlendorf JR, et al. Ron-mediated cytoplasmic signaling is dispensable for viability but is required to limit inflammatory responses. J Clin Invest 2001;108:567-576.

9 Caldwell CC, Martignoni A, Leonis MA, Ondiveeran HK, Fox-Robichaud AE, Waltz SE. Ron receptor tyrosine kinasedependent hepatic neutrophil recruitment and survival benefit in a murine model of bacterial peritonitis. Crit Care Med 2008;36:1585-1593.

10 McDowell SA, Mallakin A, Bachurski CJ, Toney-Earley K, Prows DR, Bruno T, et al. The role of the receptor tyrosine kinase Ron in nickel-induced acute lung injury. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2002;26:99-104.

11 Nikolaidis NM, Gray JK, Gurusamy D, Fox W, Stuart WD, Huber N, et al. Ron receptor tyrosine kinase negatively regulates TNFalpha production in alveolar macrophages by inhibiting NF-kappaB activity and Adam17 production. Shock 2010;33:197-204.

12 Nikolaidis NM, Kulkarni RM, Gray JK, Collins MH, Waltz SE. Ron receptor deficient alveolar myeloid cells exacerbate LPS-induced acute lung injury in the murine lung. Innate Immun 2011;17:499-507.

13 Stuart WD, Kulkarni RM, Gray JK, Vasiliauskas J, Leonis MA, Waltz SE. Ron receptor regulates Kupffer cell-dependent cytokine production and hepatocyte survival following endotoxin exposure in mice. Hepatology 2011;53:1618-1628.

14 Kulkarni RM, Kutcher LW, Stuart WD, Carson DJ, Leonis MA, Waltz SE. Ron receptor-dependent gene regulation in a mouse model of endotoxin-induced acute liver failure. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2012;11:383-392.

15 Kuboki S, Okaya T, Schuster R, Blanchard J, Denenberg A, Wong HR, et al. Hepatocyte NF-kappaB activation is hepatoprotective during ischemia-reperfusion injury and is augmented by ischemic hypothermia. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007;292:G201-207.

16 Weinstein JN, Myers TG, O'Connor PM, Friend SH, Fornace AJ Jr, Kohn KW, et al. An information-intensive approach to the molecular pharmacology of cancer. Science 1997;275:343-349.

17 Thomas PD, Kejariwal A, Campbell MJ, Mi H, Diemer K, Guo N, et al. PANTHER: a browsable database of gene products organized by biological function, using curated protein family and subfamily classification. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:334-341.

18 Hambleton J, Weinstein SL, Lem L, DeFranco AL. Activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase in bacterial lipopolysaccharidestimulated macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93: 2774-2778.

19 Kitamura H, Ito M, Yuasa T, Kikuguchi C, Hijikata A, Takayama M, et al. Genome-wide identification and characterization of transcripts translationally regulated by bacterial lipopolysaccharide in macrophage-like J774.1 cells.Physiol Genomics 2008;33:121-132.

20 Naudé PJ, Nyakas C, Eiden LE, Ait-Ali D, van der Heide R, Engelborghs S, et al. Lipocalin 2: novel component of proinflammatory signaling in Alzheimer's disease. FASEB J 2012;26:2811-2823.

21 Zhang J, Wu Y, Zhang Y, Leroith D, Bernlohr DA, Chen X. The role of lipocalin 2 in the regulation of inflammation in adipocytes and macrophages. Mol Endocrinol 2008;22: 1416-1426.

22 Fidder H, Chowers Y, Ackerman Z, Pollak RD, Crusius JB, Livneh A, et al. The familial Mediterranean fever (MEVF) gene as a modifier of Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:338-343.

23 Grandemange S, Aksentijevich I, Jeru I, Gul A, Touitou I. The regulation of MEFV expression and its role in health and familial Mediterranean fever. Genes Immun 2011;12:497-503.

24 Chae JJ, Komarow HD, Cheng J, Wood G, Raben N, Liu PP, et al. Targeted disruption of pyrin, the FMF protein, causes heightened sensitivity to endotoxin and a defect in macrophage apoptosis. Mol Cell 2003;11:591-604.

25 Bachman MA, Miller VL, Weiser JN. Mucosal lipocalin 2 has pro-inflammatory and iron-sequestering effects in response to bacterial enterobactin. PLoS Pathog 2009;5:e1000622.

26 Sunil VR, Patel KJ, Nilsen-Hamilton M, Heck DE, Laskin JD, Laskin DL. Acute endotoxemia is associated with upregulation of lipocalin 24p3/Lcn2 in lung and liver. Exp Mol Pathol 2007;83:177-187.

27 Rathore KI, Berard JL, Redensek A, Chierzi S, Lopez-Vales R, Santos M, et al. Lipocalin 2 plays an immunomodulatory role and has detrimental effects after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 2011;31:13412-13419.

28 Aigner F, Maier HT, Schwelberger HG, Wallnöfer EA, Amberger A, Obrist P, et al. Lipocalin-2 regulates the inflammatory response during ischemia and reperfusion of the transplanted heart. Am J Transplant 2007;7:779-788.

29 Chassaing B, Srinivasan G, Delgado MA, Young AN, Gewirtz AT, Vijay-Kumar M. Fecal lipocalin 2, a sensitive and broadly dynamic non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation. PLoS One 2012;7:e44328.

30 Banu N, Price DJ, London R, Deng B, Mark M, Godowski PJ, et al. Modulation of megakaryocytopoiesis by human macrophage-stimulating protein, the ligand for the RON receptor. J Immunol 1996;156:2933-2940.

31 Gabay C. Interleukin-6 and chronic inflammation. Arthritis Res Ther 2006;8:S3.

32 Kim JW, Lee SH, Jeong SH, Kim H, Ahn KS, Cho JY, et al. Increased urinary lipocalin-2 reflects matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity in chronic hepatitis C with hepatic fibrosis. Tohoku J Exp Med 2010;222:319-327.

33 Melgert BN, Beljaars L, Meijer DKF, Poelstra K. Cell specific delivery of anti-inflammatory drugs to hepatic endothelial and Kupffer cells for the treatment of inflammatory liver diseases. In: Molema G, Meijer DKF, eds. Drug targeting: organ-specific strategies, Edtion ed. Weinheim, New York: Wiley-VCH;2001:89-120.

Received April 9, 2013

Accepted after revision October 25, 2013

Author Affiliations: Department of Cancer Biology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0521, USA (Kulkarni RM, Stuart WD and Waltz SE); Department of Research, Cincinnati Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0521, USA (Waltz SE)

Susan E Waltz, PhD, Department of Cancer Biology, Vontz Center for Molecular Studies, 3125 Eden Ave, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0521, USA (Tel: 1-513-558-8675; Fax: 1-513-558-4454; Email: susan.waltz@uc.edu)

© 2014, Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. All rights reserved.

10.1016/S1499-3872(14)60254-X